Re: [Ql-Users] QaLendar 2012

2011-12-07 Thread Dilwyn Jones
This proved to be a harder nut to crack than I thought. All my efforts so far have yielded similar results. I don't have Open Office installed, but whatever I do with M$ Works causes the same "scrambled layout". I'm wondering if it is the docx extension/format that is causing you grief. Does y

Re: [Ql-Users] QaLendar 2012

2011-12-07 Thread David Tubbs
At 23:23 07/12/2011 +, you wrote: I'm wondering if it is the docx extension/format that is causing you grief. Does your version of Office allow you to save files as old-style doc? MSworks is a pain whith it's esxtra suffices, and a clumsy into the real progs. Back in days of DOS it was

Re: [Ql-Users] QaLendar 2012

2011-12-07 Thread nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk
Evening Dilwyn, Dilwyn Jones wrote: >This proved to be a harder nut to crack than I thought. All my efforts >so >far have yielded similar results. I don't have Open Office installed, >but >whatever I do with M$ Works causes the same "scrambled layout". I'm wondering if it is the docx extensio

Re: [Ql-Users] QaLendar 2012

2011-12-07 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I've just downloaded the calendar blank, Dilwyn, and I only have Open Office 3 to display it. It is haywire. Jan, Feb ok. March & April titles together and no calendar. May no calendar. June title below calendar. July to Sept no calendar. Nov and Dec ok. I was just about to send it to

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: A runtime version of QPC2?

2011-12-07 Thread Daniele Terdina
> Something similar would happen with a free unlimited version of Q-emuLator > (and the QLPAK format is perfect for that), but SBASIC could not be used, > because of SMSQ/E. You can use SMSQ/E with Q-emuLator, but even in a hypothetical world where a free Q-emuLator runtime existed, there would

Re: [Ql-Users] ignore - test

2011-12-07 Thread WILLIAM WAUGH
From: Tony Firshman To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2011, 17:36 Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] ignore - test On Dec 7, at 17:10 | Dec7, Billy wrote: > > >     TOny ing still BIlly

Re: [Ql-Users] ignore - test

2011-12-07 Thread Tony Firshman
On Dec 7, at 17:10 | Dec7, Billy wrote: > > > TOny -- QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255 t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman TF Services, 29 Longfie

[Ql-Users] ignore - test

2011-12-07 Thread Billy
___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: A runtime version of QPC2?

2011-12-07 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Geoff Wicks wrote: > I would guess that not many copies, if any, of QPC2 will be sold in > the future. That being so, it might be worth while offering Marcel a > sum of money in place of these. This could be attractive to Marcel > if he reckoned that it was worth more than he would get from the > f

Re: [Ql-Users] A runtime version of QPC2?

2011-12-07 Thread Marcos Cruz
En/Je/On 2011-12-03 09:59, j...@supanet.com escribió / skribis / wrote : > It would be possible to set up QPC2 so that clicking an icon it would > > It would also be possible to create an environment which mimicked windows > > It also possible to create a live CD which would you boot you up into

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: A runtime version of QPC2?

2011-12-07 Thread Marcos Cruz
En/Je/On 2011-12-05 17:53, George Gwilt escribió / skribis / wrote : > >If QPC2 were freely available at no cost the difficulties of the > >demo version would, of > >course, disappear. A complete freely available QPC2 (even if it will remain propietary software) would (partly) solve the problem