Im not familiar with C++ overloading, but S*BASIC allows some "parametric
polymorphism", viz:
dim x%(2): for i% = 0 to 2: x%(i%) = 9 - i%
Test 'abc', 2.99, x%
:
def proc Test(a, b%, c)
print a\ b% \ c, \
enddef Test
:
Result:
abc
2.99
9 8 7
The SBASIC compiler performs a number of additional pa
On 21 June 2018 at 15:21, Dave Park via Ql-Users
wrote:
> > SuperBASIC is quite unique in that it stores the *difference* in length
> of
> > a line compared to the previous line, along with its line number. This
> way,
> > because the current line length is also stored in a system variable, it
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
> SuperBASIC is quite unique in that it stores the *difference* in length of
> a line compared to the previous line, along with its line number. This way,
> because the current line length is also store
On 21 June 2018 at 00:43, Dave Park via Ql-Users
wrote:
> My reason for asking was, I was wondering if an analysis of how frequently
> functions were called, and from where, could affect how quickly they would
> be stepped to. I have seen this behavior in SuperBASIC on JM/JS and
> achieved often
