On 8 Mar 2007, at 19:10, Daniele Terdina wrote:
>> The easiest way to distinguish between 68020+ and the others is:
>>
>> MOVEM.L A7,-(A7)
>> CMPA.L (A7),A7
>> ADDQ.L #4,A7 ;Reset A7 and leave condition codes
>> unaltered
>> BEQ LOW ;Not 680
> The easiest way to distinguish between 68020+ and the others is:
>
> MOVEM.L A7,-(A7)
> CMPA.L (A7),A7
> ADDQ.L #4,A7 ;Reset A7 and leave condition codes
> unaltered
> BEQ LOW ;Not 68020+
Interesting... this seems to be the opposite of
On 2 Mar 2007, at 14:14, Rich Mellor wrote:
>
>> I thought it safer
>> to try a real 68020+ instruction, such as BFTST, to check the type of
>> machine. This is much more likely to be a proper test for an
>> emulator.
>
> Problem with this is the need to go through TRAPV - something I
> have
On 2 Mar 2007, at 14:14, Rich Mellor wrote:
>>
>> The easiest way to distinguish between 68020+ and the others is:
>>
>> MOVEM.L A7,-(A7)
>> CMPA.L (A7),A7
>> ADDQ.L #4,A7 ;Reset A7 and leave condition codes unaltered
>> BEQ LOW ;Not 68020+
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:04:30 -, George Gwilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 28 Feb 2007, at 16:56, Rich Mellor wrote:
>
>>
Is there an easy way under QDOS to check which chip is in use -
if it
is a
68000 or 68008 I would use 2 (or 4) MOVE.B commands instead?
SMSQ do
On 28 Feb 2007, at 16:56, Rich Mellor wrote:
>
>>> Is there an easy way under QDOS to check which chip is in use -
>>> if it
>>> is a
>>> 68000 or 68008 I would use 2 (or 4) MOVE.B commands instead?
>>> SMSQ does
>>> implement the processor in the system variables, but it is not
>>> presen
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
>>> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich Mellor wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:14 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Rich Mellor wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:14 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Rich Mellor wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich Mellor wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
>>> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
>> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>
>>> Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code would also work
>> on a Gold Card for possible future projects - not just QWord. Still
>>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich
Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code would also work
>on a Gold Card for possible future projects - not just QWord. Still
>no-one has still reported whether it works on a Gold Card+aurora or not
>yet !!
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:58:15 -, Daniele Terdina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there an easy way under QDOS to check which chip is in use - if it
>> is a
>> 68000 or 68008 I would use 2 (or 4) MOVE.B commands instead? SMSQ does
>> implement the processor in the system variables, but it
On 27 Feb 2007, at 21:58, Rich Mellor wrote:
>
> Now this crashes on a 68008 chip but I am not concerned as QWord
> needs a
> Super Gold Card ideally to run. However, I wonder whether it works
> on a
> Gold Card (not tested) - has anyone experience running QWord on a Gold
> Card, as the 6800
> Is there an easy way under QDOS to check which chip is in use - if it is a
> 68000 or 68008 I would use 2 (or 4) MOVE.B commands instead? SMSQ does
> implement the processor in the system variables, but it is not present on
> QDOS alas.
Here is what smsqe does:
move#$3700,sr !!
I need to make some amendments to my QWord program to get the code working
on Q-emulator.
The problem is because I use both MOVE.W (a1)+,(a3)+ and MOVE.L
(a1)+,(a3)+ on both odd and even addresses.
Now this crashes on a 68008 chip but I am not concerned as QWord needs a
Super Gold Card ideally to
17 matches
Mail list logo
