Την Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:34:51 -0500,ο(η) Malcolm Cadman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
>
> Have you tried a gentle tap on the hard drive ?
>
> Sometimes the head has not settled properly, particularly if it was
> moved around.
>
Not the case on 2.5" (or smaller drives). If its gone, well it's gon
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>> AFAIAA, 'C' was a development of the [typeless] language 'B' which was a
>> development of the language 'BCPL' (available at one time for the BBC
>> micro).
>
>Intersetingly enough, and if my memory serves me correctly, wasn't BCPL
>ava
Την Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:56:05 -0500,ο(η) Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
>>> No. But you can try latest Wine or, even better, Cedega to make it
>>> work. No guarantees though.
>> I had trouble making QPC work with Wine but with the commercially
>> available Wi
Την Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:38:49 -0500,ο(η) Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ.
Ντόκος) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
>
> I had trouble making QPC work with Wine but with the commercially
> available WineX it did work fine.
And of course WineX *IS* now Cedega :-)
___
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
>> No. But you can try latest Wine or, even better, Cedega to make it
>> work. No guarantees though.
> I had trouble making QPC work with Wine but with the commercially
> available WineX it did work fine.
Yes, but I have heard that the latest Wine0.9 release (after 12 years
Την Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:12:04 -0500,ο(η) Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Luckily, I have my QPC 'on a stick' so that still works, well, it
>> will when I get the disc replaced and everything restored. I don't
>> suppose there's ever going to be a QPC-Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Luckily, I have my QPC 'on a stick' so that still works, well, it
> will when I get the disc replaced and everything restored. I don't
> suppose there's ever going to be a QPC-Linux by any chance ?
No. But you can try latest Wine or, even better, Cedega to make it
work.
> AFAIAA, 'C' was a development of the [typeless] language 'B' which was a
> development of the language 'BCPL' (available at one time for the BBC
> micro).
Intersetingly enough, and if my memory serves me correctly, wasn't BCPL
available from MetaComCo (hope I got the capitalisation correct !)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Newson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
>...
>> I seem recall that the "C" language, for example, emerged as a new
>> variant computer language, as it was not "A" or "B" - which already
>> existed. So it became "C".
>
>AFAIAA, 'C' was a d
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
...
> I seem recall that the "C" language, for example, emerged as a new
> variant computer language, as it was not "A" or "B" - which already
> existed. So it became "C".
AFAIAA, 'C' was a development of the [typeless] language 'B' which was a
development of the languag
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Newson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>...
>
>> dos is perfectly legal, as in dos and don'ts. According to the Oxford
>> Talking Dictionary Unix is a proprietary name, yet they spell it as I have
>> done. Although I suppose whoever owns the name can spell it howe
...
> dos is perfectly legal, as in dos and don'ts. According to the Oxford
> Talking Dictionary Unix is a proprietary name, yet they spell it as I have
> done. Although I suppose whoever owns the name can spell it however they
> like, its not afaik an acronym, so by writing UNIX all youre doing i
At 18:11 07/11/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> I had spelled "Vegitarian" this way and the spell checker for
I think if you use the UK dic' not US, at least in Office 2000 it picks it up.
Default installation is US.
I am no great speller and I thought "spelled" looked a bit magical -
seemingly both ac
Την Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:45:47 -0500,ο(η) John Gilpin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> On a more serious note, I noticed that whilst preparing a list for the
> QL is
> 21 Dinner, I had spelled "Vegitarian" this way and the spell checker for
> Word 2003 did not pick it up as wrong. Having had the e
quot;Ignore" it to
show you the problem.
John Gilpin.
- Original Message -
From: "David Tubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spell Checking [OT]
> At 19:36 07/11/2005 +, you w
At 19:36 07/11/2005 +, you wrote:
>Eunuchs - sounds the same but more descriptive, eh ;)
Ouch, seems a touch unkind !
In any event , what is wrong with adding words to a custom dic'
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 2
Malcolm Cadman writes:
> >>> Malcom
> >>>
> >> I am on a Unix based machine.
> >> I was spell checking the word not the code and I just wondered why
> >> Unix wasn't in he dictionary.
> >
> > Umm ... I see ... :-)
> >
> > I guess it could be conspiracy ... :-)
> >
>
> Impossible :-)
> ispell & asp
17 matches
Mail list logo
