Please note that my email address has now changed to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please feel free to use this to send any queries or comments on any of our
software.
I am also looking into a new print run for the SBASIC/SuperBASIC Reference
Manual - if anyone on this list would be interested in
Per Witte wrote :
When Windoze is running, QPC just about stops whatever it is doing. With
QPC
in the background, my Windoze pointer behaves strangely (sluggish,
disappears intermittently,..) in some programs. Changing the fore- and
background settings in the startup menu does not produce
On 31 Jan 2001, at 16:41, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
It also crashes more easily, like "JMON 0" crashes straight out back
into Windoze.
Couldn't say so. Works just fine.
Same here : no problem!
Wolfgang
Wolfgang
On 31 Jan 2001, at 23:24, Peter Graf wrote:
Yes with QPC+PC (+ necessarily M$ Windows!) you get a PC! But when you say
"also" a PC you imply that you get a QL system when you buy such a PC.
I feel that real QL style hardware users seem to become a minority on this
list, but at this point
On Feb 1, 5:39pm, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2Q40
All this QPC v Q40 debate : isn't this rather moot?
I bought a PC before I had my Q40. There are two reasons I bought a Q40 and
not QPC:
1] I prefer pure QL platform. The Q40 gives me this. Plus buying it helps
Wolfgang wrote:
I disagree. If it runs Ql software, looks like a QL (on the monitor)
and baves like one, then it is a QL. Never mind whether it is an
elulator or a Q40 (or a "real" Ql, for that matter).
There are a lot of reasons why a M$ Windows PC is not a QL system. One of
them you have
- Original Message -
From: Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again
Hehe I kind of anticipated this email Geoff (although I don't know you
personally I do admire your work).
It wasn't directed to you directly but yours was the first name to come in
my mind.
I also want to mention another aspect of Emulation as well.
Emulators are supposed to completely "simulate" the native hardware.
However QPC doesn't do that with the latest QL hardware (which is the Q40).
In this aspect we are driven towards a complete separation. My belief is
that QPC should
At 04:52 1/2/2001, you wrote:
QPC does have all that, too. Isn't that amazing?
Well I don't really know what you meant here Marcel but if you think any of
us is "attacking" or "blaming" your work, well I don't think that this is
the case.
It is well established and I believe nobody here
