Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread ZN
On 6/28/01 at 11:14 AM Thierry Godefroy wrote: [lots snipped] OK, this is supposed to be a discussion, not an argument, so let me make some things clear right here. Thierry, I am not arguing 'my' approach over yours. We are really on the same side here and arguing serves no purpose. If nothing e

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 11:36 ìì 29/6/2001 -0500, you wrote: >At 03:40 ðì 29/6/2001 +0200, you wrote: >>Phoebus Dokos wrote: >> >>New, necer seen bug: when starting Cueshell v2.13 (with two >> >>default windows open to RAM1_ and DRV1_), I get a crash >> >>(only the Cueshell borders get drawn) and after a few seconds >

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 03:40 ðì 29/6/2001 +0200, you wrote: >Phoebus Dokos wrote: > >>New, necer seen bug: when starting Cueshell v2.13 (with two > >>default windows open to RAM1_ and DRV1_), I get a crash > >>(only the Cueshell borders get drawn) and after a few seconds > >>the screen fills (upward down) with a pret

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Phoebus Dokos wrote: >>New, necer seen bug: when starting Cueshell v2.13 (with two >>default windows open to RAM1_ and DRV1_), I get a crash >>(only the Cueshell borders get drawn) and after a few seconds >>the screen fills (upward down) with a pretty mauve pattern >>of pixels (screen mode is ful

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Thierry Godefroy wrote: > Reverted to v2.01 (no such problem encountered with this one)... Problem confirmed. But it's sufficient to revert to SMSQ/E v2a98 (the one from v2.01). Tony did some changes to the CON routines, I'll have a look. Marcel

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 12:33 ðì 29/6/2001 +0200, you wrote: >On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 15:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > > > For those who didn't subscribe to Jochens QLNews: > > > > the long overdue update to QPC2 v2.02 has been released: > >New, necer seen bug: when starting Cueshell v2.13 (with two >default windows open t

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 03:33 ìì 28/6/2001 +0200, you wrote: >For those who didn't subscribe to Jochens QLNews: > >the long overdue update to QPC2 v2.02 has been released: > >2.02 Fixed bug which limited the range of SMSQ/E's floating point functions. > DOS-Device: > Open routine (bug introduced in 2.01

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 12:37 ðì 29/6/2001 +0200, you wrote: >On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 23:42, Tony Firshman wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 at 21:16:18, you wrote: > > > > >"C'est l'exception qui confirme la règle" > > > > > > > > >(which I will risk to try to translate into: "This is the exception > > >which confirms

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 23:42, Tony Firshman wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 at 21:16:18, you wrote: > > >"C'est l'exception qui confirme la règle" > > > > > >(which I will risk to try to translate into: "This is the exception > >which confirms the rule") > > "The exception proves the rule" I knew i

Re: [ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 15:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > For those who didn't subscribe to Jochens QLNews: > > the long overdue update to QPC2 v2.02 has been released: New, necer seen bug: when starting Cueshell v2.13 (with two default windows open to RAM1_ and DRV1_), I get a crash (only the Cueshel

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 at 21:16:18, you wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) >Well, we should ask Tony then... But my guess is that FORMAT was >"accidentally" put in TRAP #2 calls. As we say in France: > >"C'est l'exception qui confirme la règle" > >(which I will risk to try to translate into: "This

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Thierry Godefroy wrote: > JOCHEN PLEASE READ THIS ! * As far as I know he doesn't read the list at the moment. Marcel

[ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 19:12, ZN wrote: > On 6/28/01 at 11:14 AM Thierry Godefroy wrote: > > [long filenames support via "special" device driver and thing] > > >> Well, I am glad to have been proven wrong on this. Briliant idea! > >> I wonder if a more complete spec could be made for such 'registr

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread ZN
On 6/28/01 at 11:14 AM Thierry Godefroy wrote: [long filenames support via "special" device driver and thing] >> Well, I am glad to have been proven wrong on this. Briliant idea! >> I wonder if a more complete spec could be made for such 'registration' >> mechanisms as they could be useful for o

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:13:41PM -0400, ZN wrote: > >> Well, I hate to be a party breaker, but guess what: all standard CD file > >> systems have a deeper directory structure and/or longer names than the > QL > >> is capable of handling with it's 36 character path+name limit. > > > Wrong! ISO96

[ql-users] New QPC2 release

2001-06-28 Thread Marcel Kilgus
For those who didn't subscribe to Jochens QLNews: the long overdue update to QPC2 v2.02 has been released: 2.02 Fixed bug which limited the range of SMSQ/E's floating point functions. DOS-Device: Open routine (bug introduced in 2.01) fixed. Date conversion routine fixed fo

[ql-users] Re: Digital Precision Collection

2001-06-28 Thread DARREN BRANAGH 6798433
Hi All, As per the queries regarding the DP collection copyrights, Simon Goodwin got back to me last night with the following. Seems all you really need to do is ask the authors very politely :-)) Cheers, Darren. A thought just occured to me - a DP collection on CD-R would be nice... Might

Re: [ql-users] Re: Q40/Q60 device drivers

2001-06-28 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Jeudi 28 Juin 2001 04:13, ZN wrote: [long filenames support via "special" device driver and thing] > Well, I am glad to have been proven wrong on this. Briliant idea! > I wonder if a more complete spec could be made for such 'registration' > mechanisms as they could be useful for other parts o