At 03:54 ìì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>uk>, Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Bit quiet today, are we all QL'ing ?
> >I didn't get any mail last night either - must be busy out there.
> >
> >Anyway, here's a laugh - not !
> >
> >I use a ZIP disc to run QPC on
At 12:54 ðì 11/5/2002, you wrote:
>On 10/05/02 at 13:02 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> >Actually when the GF will be hopefully available, its onboard DSP will be
> >able to deal with tasks like that IIRC the specs Nasta released.
>
>Eh, information is only as good as it is acc
At 12:58 ìì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>Hi Phoebus.
>
>Well, the plan at the moment is to complete Manchester's DVD in time for
>Washington, and produce a second DVD with material shot in Washington.
>
>I'll discuss the possibilities with him re. using your material and we'll
>see how it goes, so th
At 12:46 ìì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>Hi Norman.
>
>I'm using a Mac PowerBook G4 and while it's pretty nippy, I've still had
>to wait 25 minutes for a 2-minute piece to render broadcast-safe colour
>correction. Still at least now the MPEG encoder won't spit at it when I
>encode it for authoring.
At 11:42 ðì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>Phoebus - DB tells me you've been to these things before, so any idea what
>time the crab fest will start on Sunday 2nd June?
>
>Just wanted to say you're not the only ones around today.
>
>Thanks for listening.
Actually I have no clue. Last time I was around
At 10:50 ðì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>Hi Phoebus,
>
>thanks for that info.
>
>The Zip disc is fairly new, but has only ever been used for QPC purposes.
>There are no noises from the drive - apart from the normal ones.
There is also a possibility of the zip disk being locked in the drive while
a sh
At 10:20 ðì 10/5/2002, you wrote:
>Bit quiet today, are we all QL'ing ?
>I didn't get any mail last night either - must be busy out there.
>
>Anyway, here's a laugh - not !
>
>I use a ZIP disc to run QPC on so I can travel between home and work and
>still do stuff QL wise.
>Today, I decide to upg
At 03:00 ðì 3/5/2002, Rich Mellor wrote:
>Is there any reason why all your emails to the ql-user mailing list are
>sent twice??
Yes, I am stupid :-) (Stupid enough to poke in Eudora's settings that is :-)
Anyway, tis fixed now :-)
Phoebus
Hi all,
Just a quick tip for Europeans traveling to the US show in June...
If you want to bring your mobile phone with you, I would like to remind you
that only Tri-band or 1,9 GHz enabled dual band phones can work in the US.
These include the Motorola P7xxx series and the T250, Siemens S20 and
Hi all,
Just a quick tip for Europeans traveling to the US show in June...
If you want to bring your mobile phone with you, I would like to remind you
that only Tri-band or 1,9 GHz enabled dual band phones can work in the US.
These include the Motorola P7xxx series and the T250, Siemens S20 and
At 06:28 ìì 2/5/2002, Roy Wood wrote:
>In message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Norman
>Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Don't forget who invented it in the first place though :o)
>>(I suspect, as with all smugness, I shal regret that sentence !)
>I seem to recall the invention of copper wire - two
ame to Pheobus
instead of Phoebus ;-)
Of course I guess I shouldn't complain as you only changed my nationality
while in a recent case you renamed Phil Borman (of Rebel/QubID/QTPI fame)
to Phil Boreman :-)
Hehehe :-) It was funny I must admit :-)
PhOEbus DokOs
At 06:40 ðì 1/5/2002, Al Feng wrote:
>Essentially, when you swap QL ROMs, the video output for "TV" mode
>changes from NTSC to PAL and vice-versa for JSU & JS, respectively.
>
>Al
I would imagine that it is "patch"-able though no?
Phoebus
At 04:44 ìì 1/5/2002, you wrote:
>On 01/05/02 at 15:02 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> >>I have also constructed (ah, the good old days!) a 68020 add-on board...
> >>I did a lot of guesswork when doing that circuit and more logic would
> >>have been needed to get it
At 03:40 ìì 1/5/2002, you wrote:
>On Wed, 1 May 2002, ZN wrote:
>
> > The EU and US specs are actually remarkably similar, and only really differ
> > in the number of lines drawn on the screen. 312 EU, 262 US. However, both
>
>However, the English PAL system is BETTER! ;P
I do agree... being e
At 03:15 ìì 1/5/2002, you wrote:
>John Hall bought a Di-Ren interface from jjohn gilpin at the Manchester
>Show. He also got the manual (I know, as I was on John Gilpin's house when
>he found it!!)
>
>Maybe John Hall would be able to photocopy it for you - its only a single
>A4 page (front and
At 02:46 ìì 1/5/2002, ZN wrote:
>
>It may be possible to use a bit of external logic to slow the 68008 down on
>certain cycles and make it compatible again. I know Stuart H had to solve
>that for the GC.
>In fact, running the 68008 at double rate would probably make the logic
>simpler, I suspect
At 12:39 ìì 28/4/2002, you wrote:
>Hi all
>
>As I have plenty of "holidays" left (our human resources manager is
>pushing me to take them this year) and I also have plenty of
>Qualiflyer-miles (ex Swissair, now Swiss). I consider to do a
>"few days trip" to the US and with the right timing it cou
Hi all,
the new address of the website is www.dokos-gr.net
From there you'll be able to access most of my pages (Proforma fonts
etc..., Web & Graphic design, music & photography all of which I am sure
are of no importance :-)) as well as Thierry's QDOS-SMSQ/E software
repository (With a new lo
At 07:51 ìì 24/4/2002, John Impellizzeri wrote:
> > It was actually more expensive to call Michigan (It is Michigan isn't it?)
>Yes, Detroit area.
>
> > Indeed the files were very old and you
> > could tell they weren't maintained as a message I left never got
> > answered... That's not by any me
At 03:00 ìì 24/4/2002, Duncan Neithercut wrote:
>Hello,
>What are you running it on?
>Phoebus Dokos had this problem can arise on SMSQ/E with version less than
>2.98.
>I produced a version with a work around for Phoebos Dokos while I am working
>on an upgrade.
>
>Duncan
At 11:03 ðì 24/4/2002, Ian wrote:
> >Yeah and that's why:
> >http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=139.149.1.38%3E
> >
> >Phoebus
>Well, if that was an explanation of why I was blocked (and I suppose it
>would be for network gurus) it goes way over my head. How come it just
>picked one m
At 10:09 ðì 24/4/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I tried sending a message to the list earlier, and got this back:
>
>Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
>
> Subject: RE: [ql-users] QXLWIN v1.06 and partitions
> Sent: 24/04/02 13:45
>
>The following
At 02:58 ðì 24/4/2002, you wrote:
>Thanks.
>
>But I cant get it to work.. It stops with QCDEZE Line 19330 BGET , or
>a similar message on a different line. cdrom_explorer_bas works.
>
>/Michael
Michael,
you have probably the same problem I had with it... I will send you my copy
privately which
At 04:08 ìì 23/4/2002, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
>Claus , dont forgot to mention that qxlwin works very
>well also with Compact Flash card .
>Ciao
>Fabrizio
Yep it works and the interesting part is that unfortunately he cannot test
it himself as his CF adapter has some problems which I hope he'l
At 12:40 ìì 23/4/2002, you wrote:
> > By having a plugin filter rule system, we can also direct emails that
>contain
> > "this is not spam", "!!" and "" can be
>directed
> > straight to hell...
>
>A few things not often found, but very useful to have in order to block
>spam:
>1) Delete messag
At 10:47 ðì 23/4/2002, you wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > How about support for both POP3 and IMAP?
>
>POP3 support is trivial, and I have all the RFCs here. I don't have
>documentation for, and have never personally used, IMAP, so it will come
>second, but it will c
At 03:12 ìì 22/4/2002, you wrote:
> > There is a working stack. However several facilities are missing. Among
> them:
> >
> > PPP support and Name resolution.
>Implementing name resolution cant that hard. I volunter.
>
> >
> > uQLx has full TCPIP support for some years now and there are a coupl
At 01:39 ìì 22/4/2002, you wrote:
> >
> > Thierry has been a point to me for many years now.
> > QBOX USA are also, but I have not had anything from them for a long
> > while now - is it still going?
> >
>
>QBox-USA has been down for a few weeks now. The power supply died and while
>I got that
At 02:13 ìì 22/4/2002, you wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
>
>Hi
>
> >
> > I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
> > program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
> > ex
I found a little adaptor that enables the upgrade from a 68040 to an 68060...
Does anyone think that this could work on a QXL or Q40???
Phoebus
At 12:45 ìì 20/4/2002, you wrote:
>At 09:00 AM 4/20/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>I was wondering if any one has "The Shell"'s accompanying utilities
>>available. The zip file i had them in is (once more) corrupt and i would
>>appreciate it if someone mailed them to me :-)
>
>If you don't
Hi all,
I was wondering if any one has "The Shell"'s accompanying utilities
available. The zip file i had them in is (once more) corrupt and i would
appreciate it if someone mailed them to me :-)
Thanks,
Phoebus
At 12:14 ðì 20/4/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Timothy Swenson wrote:
>
> > With all that said, I'm still a big fan of TURBO as it is FREEWARE. I'd
> > like to see some more elegant work-arounds to some of the issues, but I'll
> > take what I get. The combination of TURBO and TurboPTR
At 11:56 ìì 19/4/2002, Tim Swenson wrote:
>
>>Actually equivalent Sbasic code generated by Turbo is faster by a factor
>>of almost 15% or so (in tests I run) over QLiberator.
>>Turbo has other problems though like parameter passing...
>
>TURBO does have more constraints than does Qlib. Qlib all
At 09:20 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> > > > I have a 20 Giger drive here and it seems pretty stupid to have to
> > > > partition the drive in order to get Win2_
> > >
> > >Well, it just is that stupid.
>
At 08:43 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>At 08:26 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>
>>Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>> > Yes I know that (and I did), but I was asking if you can assign a .win
>> file
>> > (any QXL.WIN file, regardless of filename or disk - a la QPC :-).
>>
&g
At 08:26 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> > Yes I know that (and I did), but I was asking if you can assign a .win file
> > (any QXL.WIN file, regardless of filename or disk - a la QPC :-).
>
>Well, you can try the ASSIGN command under DOS. Don't know
At 08:25 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> > Is that possible?
>
>Hard to say, my database is not based in GCC compiled binaries, but
>once can take a rough factor of 1.3 to 1.33 between C68/GCC and
>according to that it should be 25000-25500 i/s for an Ath
At 07:58 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone knows (Marcel probably :-) how you can attach
> > other QXL.WIN files apart from the one you can make.
>
>Put WIN1 in C:\QXL.WIN, WIN2 in D:\QXL.WIN etc.
Yes I know that (and I did), bu
At 07:56 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> > So there's no hotkey transparent switching? VERY annoying :-(
>
>Why don't you just define one?
>
>Marcel
>
Because I assume it will have to switch from whatever you're doing to
S*Basic, load the
At 06:44 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>For SBASIC programming, best start is TURBO, which is now freeware. It's not
>quite as powerfull as Qliberator, but you can get it online (check Dilwyn's
>web site) with manuals and a number of extra tools including TurboPTR, a tool
>for creating Pointer Enviro
Hi all,
being that I just received my QXL I went ahead and used a Thierry's
Dhrystone (gcc compiled) 2.1 to compare my 25MHz QXL w/8 Mb. with QPC
v.2.03 running on an Athlon 750 / 512 Meg. Ram
The results are kind of stunning:
I set it for 500 runs
Here goes:
QPC
OS: SMSQ/E 2.99
ìsec p
At 03:15 ìì 19/4/2002, I wrote:
>Hey all,
>I was wondering if anyone knows (Marcel probably :-) how you can attach
>other QXL.WIN files apart from the one you can make.
>I have SMSQ/E 2.91 with the QXL btw :-) (So does Dave ;-) Many thanks to
>Wolfgang
Make that 2.85 :-) It just said 2.91
Hey all,
I was wondering if anyone knows (Marcel probably :-) how you can attach
other QXL.WIN files apart from the one you can make.
I have SMSQ/E 2.91 with the QXL btw :-) (So does Dave ;-) Many thanks to
Wolfgang
Phoebus
At 01:34 ìì 19/4/2002, you wrote:
>Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
> > As far as I know there are only three keyboard layouts which you can
> choose by typing
> > "kbd_table countrycode"
> > for example: kbd_table 49 is German, 44 English and 33 French
>
>There's a separate table for the US. One can btw a
Hi all,
since I don't have the SMSQ/E manual, I would like someone (non
British/American) to tell me how keyboard layout switching is performed (if
it can be performed) on SMSQ/E. For example if you are typing in English
and want to switch say in German or Norwegian what do you do? Is there any
At 02:13 ìì 18/4/2002, The DaveMAN wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> > http://www.pc-extras.com/prods/adcgav.html
>
>The connector shown does not convert the signal from CGA to VGA - it only
>converts the conenctor from a CGA-style 9-pin socket to a VGA+
I was wondering if something like the inverse of what was to be the QXLGold
could be constructed in order to connect a QXL to a regular QL bus
Just a wild question!
Phoebus
At 01:44 ìì 18/4/2002, you wrote:
>On 18/04/02 at 11:46 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> >>Where can you get the CGA-VGA adapter?
>
> >Here
> >http://www.pc-extras.com/prods/adcgav.html
>
>Ah, don't bother. It only adapts signal levels - will not work unless t
Hi all,
where can I find a QXL manual and SMSQ (/e) for it? Is it still on sale etc?
Phoebus
At 09:51 ðì 18/4/2002, Al Feng wrote:
>Yes, the US QL can be used with a CGA monitor; BUT, one line's signal
>needs to be inverted -- others who are more technically inclined can
>hopefully elaborate.
>
>An older, NEC EGA-multisync monitor _can_ be hooked up to a QL, but my
>recollection is th
At 11:29 ìì 17/4/2002, you wrote:
>On 18/04/02 at 00:04 Dexter wrote:
>
> >> It is all explained in Keith Mitchell's hardware docs. Every other line
> >> in the ribbon is an earth. By twisting lines 10 through 13 you are
> >> swapping the drive 0 with the drive one signal with the earth line as a
At 08:31 ìì 17/4/2002, you wrote:
> > Not the Qemulator though ;-) HINT HINT HINT (The site is down)
>
>Yahoo deleted the site, I have no idea why.
>Daniele
In any case does the registration.exe's info still stand?
Phoebus
Hello again,
here's stupid question no. 2.
Since I don't remember its specs but I do remember that most multisync
monitors cannot go low enough for the QL to output on them...
Is the QL compatible with CGA monitors (or was that only TTL and not Analog?)
If it is I just found a nice adapter from
At 08:16 ìì 17/4/2002, you wrote:
> > But I don't know whether there is still a copyright or not?
>
>I remember there was a web site with images of the PC (DOS) version of Psion
>Chess. The site claimed that Psion gave permission to use them for non
>commercial purposes (while still retaining the
Hi all,
thanks to extreme promptness by Duncan Neithercourt, QCDEZE now works with
the Aurora/SMSQ/E 2.91. (BTW: Great Icons :-)
A quick test result.
Copy of a713 Mb QXL.WIN from CD to the HDD in under 16 minutes (15,29 to be
exact) :-) That's a really great result with QubIDE and (only) an SG
At 07:05 ìì 17/4/2002, Hohn Impellizzeri wrote:
>
>It's been awhile and I'd have to haul out an old QL and a 'scope to verify
>it but I think the composite signal had all the components it was just
>output at the wrong levels and most monitors can't tolerate the signal being
>that far out of spec
At 06:22 ìì 17/4/2002,I wrote:
>>Mind you someone reported at Manchester that Xchange does not work
>>loaded from RomDisq in his system (SGC) but does with GC.
>>He gets a crash with creeping screen drawing from bottom.
>>Most odd, as mine does work from RD with all hardware.
>>Anyone else seen s
At 06:01 ìì 17/4/2002, you wrote:
>Mind you someone reported at Manchester that Xchange does not work
>loaded from RomDisq in his system (SGC) but does with GC.
>He gets a crash with creeping screen drawing from bottom.
>Most odd, as mine does work from RD with all hardware.
>Anyone else seen si
Hmmm can someone tell me why the twist on the floppy cable for Miracle fdd
cables consists of 3 signals only unlike the one used on the PC?
Believe it or not, I just noticed! Well better late than never :-)
Is it like that with every FDD controller used on the QL or there are some
with the PC
At 04:03 ìì 17/4/2002, Claus wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 02:41:28 -0400
>Phoebus Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > has anyone tried yet to use Thierry's ATAPI/CD ROM extensions under QDOS?
> > Does it require the THING_rext extension?
>
At 12:20 ìì 17/4/2002, Malcolm wrote:
>It also works fine in hi-colour mode at any resolution using the
>QPC_QLSCREMU command.
IF you have QPC 2 v.3.x :-) hehe
Phoebus
(Does work right in "QL Colours" with v.2.x too tho )
Hi all,
has anyone tried yet to use Thierry's ATAPI/CD ROM extensions under QDOS?
Does it require the THING_rext extension?
Phoebus
At 03:22 ðì 17/4/2002, you wrote:
>Ok , Its what I do , today.
>
>Can PROG_USE contain more places than one ? or is there any other $PATH
>like variable ?
There are two extensions that create devices called PTH (path) and DEV
(device) which will do the trick... albeit not as good of elegant as
Hi All,
now that my QL is up and running (even without the cover!) I am trying to
recover some of my programs that are dead (microcartridges DO go bad and so
do DD 5 1/4" disks formatted as Quad Density -I know I should have used the
Quad Disks that I was selling but they were expensive! :-
Am I right to assume that the US QLs do not generate a "proper" (US spec
that is) Composite video signal?
I tried GND and where in the manual says PAL (which I assumed would be NTSC
for the US but since I don't have a US manual I don't know!) but the only
place I can get the QL to output compos
At 02:58 ðì 17/4/2002, Michael Grunditz wrote:
>Is it best to keep "all" utils in the same place ,directory ?
>
>/Michael
I personally believe it's a good idea to try to keep them separate
according to type... Less clutter...
The filing facilities of SMSQ/E - QDOS are really limited and direct
At 07:23 ìì 16/4/2002, you wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Phoebus
>Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Hi all,
>>I asked a little while back for info on which is the latest SMSQ/E for
>>the SGC Does anyone know?
>Difficult question. 2.99 was r
At 05:50 ìì 16/4/2002, Rich Mellor wrote:
>OOh, Phoebus, this is now approaching seriously dodgy ground. I have
>various updates of the old software I can provide which enable them to
>work from disk. See my web-site for details -
>http://hometown.aol.co.uk/rwapsoftware/updates.html
>
>Howeve
At 06:00 ìì 16/4/2002, you wrote:
> >BTW, what is : Josiah Oobadiah - some game I've never heard of??
> >
> >Rich Mellor
An Arkanoid clone (and pretty good too) to be precise :-)
Phoebus
Hi all,
I asked a little while back for info on which is the latest SMSQ/E for the
SGC Does anyone know?
Phoebus
Hi All,
I intend to put on the repository additional software like for example
Microdrive based games (eg. Steve Davies Snooker, Bounder, BJ, Quboids etc...)
in order to preserve as much QL software as possible.
If anyone has any information on games / software (apart from the ones we
know like
At 02:15 ìì 16/4/2002, Timothy Swenson wrote:
>
>Tim Swenson
IIRC all these are explained in the QDOS/SMS Reference Manual... I'll look
into it and tell you
Phoebus
At 12:33 ìì 16/4/2002, Tony Firshman (manually edited,,, THERE) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 at 15:41:01, Norman Dunbar wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> >So did Douglas :o)
>Whoops - who was 'Richard' I wonder (8-)#
The one that couldn't apparently :-
Phoebus
At 10:26 ðì 16/4/2002, you wrote:
>yes me, it is ok, it is a pity not having back also
>q60linux.free.fr !
I think that Richard has something along these lines?
Claus also can definitely point you to it
Phoebus
Hi all,
Did anyone try to access the SMS repository yet? (Oh I know I am too lazy
to read my stats ;-)
Phoebus
At 09:07 ðì 16/4/2002, you wrote:
>I thought I'd share this one with you all - seeing as how there is no
>Assembler Tutorial in the latest QL Taody.
>
>There are 10 kinds of people in this world -
>Those who understand binary, and those who don't !!
Good One! :-) Although given my recent experie
At 09:38 ìì 15/4/2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>At 08:30 ìì 15/4/2002, Me, myself and I wrote:
>>At 04:44 ìì 15/4/2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>>
>>>Yes please! I'd even take a copy on CD of the whole lot if my cheek
>>>doesn't offend you! I have received QCDEZE from Duncan this weekend so
>>>can (privat
At 08:30 ìì 15/4/2002, Me, myself and I wrote:
>At 04:44 ìì 15/4/2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>
>>Yes please! I'd even take a copy on CD of the whole lot if my cheek
>>doesn't offend you! I have received QCDEZE from Duncan this weekend so
>>can (privately) email this to you if you wish.
>
>I will upl
At 04:44 ìì 15/4/2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>Yes please! I'd even take a copy on CD of the whole lot if my cheek
>doesn't offend you! I have received QCDEZE from Duncan this weekend so
>can (privately) email this to you if you wish.
I will upload it (doing it now) on: www.dokos-gr.net/dj/ This is
Hi All,
I remind anyone interested that I do have a saved copy of Thierry's
smsq.free.fr website before free.fr destroyed it all...
Unfortunately it doesn't include QCDEZE and a couple updates Thierry did to
it after I "snatched" it.
Anyone interested, please send me an email so I can send you
At 10:44 ìì 14/4/2002, Dave wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> > Yep but I said readers didn't I The specs of the readers I am selling
> > say up to 33 Mbps :-)
>
>Well, yes and no.
>
>The readers are passive, and some CF media support
At 07:53 ìì 14/4/2002, Dave wrote with Dexter(ity):
>On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
> > The CF readers can go up to 33 Mbps guaranteed and the HDDs well
> depends on
> > the machine :-) Some up to 133Mbps (like the 80gig Maxtor that I have on
> > the A
At 06:27 ìì 14/4/2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
>Of course, there is fixed QL processing time here as well.
>This means that the actual physical read from RomDisq is, in percentage
>terms, even better.
>In my measurements, I found RomDisq read at 2mbyte per second.
>What is the physical read speed of
At 04:17 ìì 14/4/2002, Bill Waugh wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 8:26 PM
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] CF Hot Removable adapters
>
>
>On Sat, 13 Ap
I found this:
http://www.caseoutlet.com/NWPc/default.htm
It's name (really appropriate) is Q-Box... unfortunately it only comes with
a Mainboard :-(
Phoebus
At 01:44 ðì 13/4/2002, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I don't have a QL manual. Could some kind sole with 30 minutes to spare
>please either scan the keymap or type it out, and email it to me?
>
>I am trying to check my Qeyboard design manually from the membrane I have
>here, and my eyes have given out!
>
>On 13 Apr 2002 at 7:22, Dexter wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Dexter wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have a QL manual. Could some kind sole with 30
>minutes to spare
> > > please either scan the keymap or type it out, and email
>it to me?
>
>Scanned and sent
>
>Anthony Gordon
in ANY case I am se
At 02:22 ðì 13/4/2002, Tony "The Wizard" Firshman wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 at 21:19:52, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>..., think again Even with
> >the fastest card, due to QubIDE restrictions (yep 8 bit bus and all the
> >magic Nasta performs in order to make thi
>On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Dexter wrote:
>
> > I don't have a QL manual. Could some kind sole with 30 minutes to spare
> > please either scan the keymap or type it out, and email it to me?
>
>Gnnn! I'm such a heel. If the shoe was on the other foot, I'd kick myself!
>
>Dave
>
>(sole, geddit?)
Almost
Hi all,
I now can guarantee that the CF hot removable adapters DO work with both
SMSQ/E and QDOS with a modified QubIDE... both versions 1.56 and 2.01 were
tested.
Furthermore, if you only use one type of card if you store the drive
parameters using the storesh_obj or storei2c_obj you are able
At 03:46 ìì 12/4/2002, Al Feng wrote:
>BTW. You may want to elaborate as to any OTHER (?) hassles that
>*Europeans* apparently encounter when accepting funds through PayPal
>since it sounds as though you have already made transfers between the US
>& individuals in Europe.
>
>Al
>
Hi Al,
first
At 01:38 ìì 12/4/2002, you wrote:
>Hello Wolfgang,
>
>Despite some of the hassles of PayPal, it IS a viable method for
>transferring funds ... there are some limitations [they presume you have
>a bank account and credit card somewhere and ...] AND hassles.
>
>But, the "money" is real ... AND, the
At 11:54 ðì 12/4/2002, you wrote:
>Hi there,
>I was at the post office and the packed QXLs will go to England for ? 4,75
>and to
>America for ? 9,50.
>
>I must admit, however, that I have no idea how you could manage to give me
>the
>money - I have absolutely no experience with abroad money tra
At 09:35 ðì 12/4/2002, you wrote:
>I have a copy I can add to our web-site if you like.
>
>Just a warning, DO NOT TRY TO USE the recycle bin on Aurora - I trashed a
>few files using this.
Sure put it in the commercial dir :-)
As for the trashcan.obj I had some brushes with it of my own...
Hi all,
does anyone have a copy of the QubIDE 2.0 utilities disk and have enough
bandwidth to send it to me
I by mistake (that's how I call stupidity these days :-) erased it before I
kept a copy :-)
Thanks,
Phoebus
At 11:22 ìì 11/4/2002, you wrote:
>At 02:18 AM 4/11/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Definitely a must-read :-) Tim is extremely talented in making even the
>>most complex subjects easy to understand...
>
>Ok, was that $5 or $10 for the glowing remarks. :-)
>
>Tim
Ahhh don't mention it... just send t
002 at 14:17:54, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
> >At 12:15 ìì 8/4/2002, you wrote:
>Who?^
>This is something I got pulled up (rightly) on quite a while back.
>This attribute is fine for personal email, but is not good in a public
&g
I found some great black peripherals (including a great case which would be
ideal for the Q60 here:
http://www.directron.com/blaccom.html
Phoebus
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
