Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision Collection

2001-06-27 Thread Tony Firshman
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 at 21:15:15, you wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) At 12:02 AM 6/28/2001 -0500, you wrote: Maybe Simon (N) Goodwin or Chas Dillon can shed some light into this? They should know the status. I believe that most of the programs had a time clause to them and are now owned by

[ql-users] Digital Precision collection

2001-06-27 Thread DARREN BRANAGH 6798433
Hi All, I would concur with Tony - Freddy would certainly sue, all depends on if he still actually owns the copyright or not, or they were indeed time limited and have reverted to Simon et al as the authors. Simon doesn't subscribe to this list, but I have forwarded this email to him for

Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision collection

2001-06-27 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 10:16 ðì 27/6/2001 +, you wrote: Hi All, I would concur with Tony - Freddy would certainly sue, all depends on if he still actually owns the copyright or not, or they were indeed time limited and have reverted to Simon et al as the authors. Simon doesn't subscribe to this list, but I

Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision Collection

2001-06-26 Thread Timothy Swenson
At 12:02 AM 6/28/2001 -0500, you wrote: Maybe Simon (N) Goodwin or Chas Dillon can shed some light into this? They should know the status. I believe that most of the programs had a time clause to them and are now owned by the original authors. Now the problem might be tracking down the