Re: [ql-users] Jochen Merz - Forwarded email

2002-03-21 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 20 Mar 2002, at 18:44, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > Why should it? In opposite to the other platforms QPC is still > actively developed by me. This doesn't mean that you necessarily won't > be able to build SMSQ/E for QPC. I could provide anybody who wants to > do something with the necessary bits,

Re: [ql-users] Jochen Merz - Forwarded email

2002-03-20 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Eindhoven] > Not sure. I'm having a dinner planned for that evening. I'll see > what I can do... I had much better things to do this weekend, too... but I've just acquired the train tickets to come to Eindhoven. >> The status of QPC, for example, won't change at all. >

Re: [ql-users] Jochen Merz - Forwarded email

2002-03-18 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
> It all went off quite fast, faster than Tony actually thought. > The idea was that the people involved would meet at Eindhoven > next weekend and discuss matters, to see what can be done. I personally can not make it. I have a race on saturday. However, I have already made my point clear I think

Re: [ql-users] Jochen Merz - Forwarded email

2002-03-18 Thread wlenerz
Jochen Merz wrote > The idea was that the people involved would meet at Eindhoven > next weekend and discuss matters, to see what can be done. > I guess as you, Wolfgang, got everything going, we will meet > you there too, won't we? ;-) Not sure. I'm having a dinner planned for that evening. I'

[ql-users] Jochen Merz - Forwarded email

2002-03-18 Thread Bruce N
From: Jochen Merz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: QL Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: A bit of clarification? Date: Mon18 Mar 2002 12:31:15 +0100 Hi Everybody, after having spoken to Marcel, Wolfgang, Roy and Tony Tebby, I think it is time to say a few words. It all went off quite fast, faster than