Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message

2001-05-27 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Malcolm Cadman wrote: Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform independent. The only thing which is possible is that the SMSQ floating point functions have a bug whereas the QPC ones haven't. Knowing

Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message

2001-05-26 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Malcolm Cadman wrote: Are the earlier versions of SMSQ/E that different ? Or is it QPC2 that is masking the problem by not going 'fatal' ? Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform independent. The

[ql-users] SBASIC error message

2001-05-24 Thread Christopher Cave
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks to Marcel, I had a proper look and think about what I was doing. The moral is not to transfer SBASIC program as _sav files but as text files. Silly me! Christopher Cave

Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message

2001-05-23 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Christopher Cave wrote: [fatal error in SBASIC interpreter] The message can have many meanings, it's generally used when things are checked which are never supposed to go wrong anyway (at least better than just crashing or whatever). As generic functions like convert expression to operation

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 13 Mar 2001, at 19:11, FranoisVan Emelen wrote: No problems here with Windows 98. Here I use QPC2 under win 98 SE. (or QXL). Both have this problem. Wolfgang

[ql-users] Sbasic crash

2001-03-13 Thread Christopher Cave
In-Reply-To: 3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost Wolfgang Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed. The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K. Christopher Cave

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic crash

2001-03-13 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 13 Mar 2001, at 8:44, Christopher Cave wrote: In-Reply-To: 3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost Wolfgang Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed. The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K. Oh yes, the rest of the system carries on OK. Thanks for

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Can anyone repeat this? Doesn't crash here. Marcel

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-13 Thread Dave Westbury
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Can anyone repeat this? Doesn't crash here. Marcel Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo and it does, viz: (1) Launch QPC2 demo (2) type program into basic 10 DEF PROC a(b,c%) 20 END DEF a (3) QSAVE ram1_p (4) EXEP 'SBASIC' (5) switch to daughter SBASIC

RE: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-13 Thread Norman Dunbar
-Original Message- From: Dave Westbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Sbasic Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Can anyone repeat this? Doesn't crash here. Marcel Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-13 Thread FrançoisVan Emelen
Norman Dunbar wrote: Yep here too. On NT4 service pack 6 Running a registered copy of QPC2v2 and SMSQ version 2.98 (ver$(1)) Following Dave's instructions to the letter ends up with a daughter job showing the no entry pointer. :o( Norman. No problems here with Windows 98.

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-13 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dave Westbury wrote: Can anyone repeat this? Doesn't crash here. Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo and it does, viz: Oh, indeed. I used qload rather than qlrun. Marcel

[ql-users] Sbasic crash

2001-03-13 Thread Christopher Cave
In-Reply-To: 3AAE55FA.15300.AA00A@localhost I got crashes on: QXL both SMSQv2.76 and SMSQEv2.98 QPC2 with SMSQEv2.98 Christopher Cave

Re: [ql-users] Sbasic

2001-03-12 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hello all I seemto have a curious problem is SMSQE Sbasic: Writing out the following lines: 10 def proc a(b,c%) 20 end def a and then: Qsave ram1_p followed by QLrun ram1_p crashes the copy of the basic interpreter. Can anyone repeat this? Wolfgang