In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform
independent. The only thing which is possible is that the SMSQ
floating point functions have a bug whereas the QPC ones haven't.
Knowing
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Are the earlier versions of SMSQ/E that different ? Or is it QPC2 that
is masking the problem by not going 'fatal' ?
Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform
independent. The
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to Marcel, I had a proper look and think about what I was doing.
The moral is not to transfer SBASIC program as _sav files but as text
files. Silly me!
Christopher Cave
Christopher Cave wrote:
[fatal error in SBASIC interpreter]
The message can have many meanings, it's generally used when things
are checked which are never supposed to go wrong anyway (at least
better than just crashing or whatever). As generic functions like
convert expression to operation
On 13 Mar 2001, at 19:11, FranoisVan Emelen wrote:
No problems here with Windows 98.
Here I use QPC2 under win 98 SE. (or QXL). Both have this
problem.
Wolfgang
In-Reply-To: 3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost
Wolfgang
Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed.
The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K.
Christopher Cave
On 13 Mar 2001, at 8:44, Christopher Cave wrote:
In-Reply-To: 3AADD745.29568.3C11E@localhost
Wolfgang
Yes but, as your message implied, it was just the SBASIC job that crashed.
The rest of the system appeared to carry on O.K.
Oh yes, the rest of the system carries on OK.
Thanks for
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Can anyone repeat this?
Doesn't crash here.
Marcel
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Can anyone repeat this?
Doesn't crash here.
Marcel
Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo and it does, viz:
(1) Launch QPC2 demo
(2) type program into basic
10 DEF PROC a(b,c%)
20 END DEF a
(3) QSAVE ram1_p
(4) EXEP 'SBASIC'
(5) switch to daughter SBASIC
-Original Message-
From: Dave Westbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Sbasic
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Can anyone repeat this?
Doesn't crash here.
Marcel
Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo
Norman Dunbar wrote:
Yep here too.
On NT4 service pack 6
Running a registered copy of QPC2v2 and SMSQ version 2.98 (ver$(1))
Following Dave's instructions to the letter ends up with a daughter job
showing the no entry pointer.
:o(
Norman.
No problems here with Windows 98.
Dave Westbury wrote:
Can anyone repeat this?
Doesn't crash here.
Sorry Marcel, just tried the QPC2 demo and it does, viz:
Oh, indeed. I used qload rather than qlrun.
Marcel
In-Reply-To: 3AAE55FA.15300.AA00A@localhost
I got crashes on:
QXL both SMSQv2.76 and SMSQEv2.98
QPC2 with SMSQEv2.98
Christopher Cave
Hello all
I seemto have a curious problem is SMSQE Sbasic:
Writing out the following lines:
10 def proc a(b,c%)
20 end def a
and then:
Qsave ram1_p
followed by QLrun ram1_p
crashes the copy of the basic interpreter.
Can anyone repeat this?
Wolfgang
14 matches
Mail list logo