Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-05 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 at 22:24:17, P Witte wrote: (ref: <000e01c19637$d1395e10$0100a8c0@gamma>) >If were thinking about a future for the QL in line with its promising >beginnings something entirely different is called for than trying to "catch >up" with mainstream. The QL isnt a PC; its a comput

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-05 Thread P Witte
Dave Dexter goes out on a limb and writes: > If I were to go out on a limb, I would specify: > > Capacity: > 68060 - at 50MHz or better > 4MB flash ROM - for QDOS, SMSQ/E etc, plus room to grow. > 32MB RAM - expandable by daughter card[1] > > Interfaces: > Monitor - SVGA, XGA capable > IDE - ATA

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-05 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:55:11PM +, Dexter wrote: > OS: > This is much more vague, because it isn't "my area", but I'd be looking > for modularisation of the OS. I'd like it to be much easier to write > device drivers and modules. I would be looking for SuperBASIC, compilable. > The filing

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-04 Thread Tony Firshman
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 at 16:22:58, Dexter wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > >Hi all, > >I've had at least half a dozen offers for machines by private email. Thank >you! I'll reply individually tonight... > >I'm still looking for a schematic of the QL PCB. See my homepage - Overseas price list. >

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-04 Thread ZN
On 1/4/02 at 9:55 PM Dexter wrote: >On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, ZN wrote: >> A quick question: what do you use for USB? [Microchip] ...I thought so. I've looked at the USB97C100 (not directly in connection with QL hardware, though) and like most implementations, getting one's hands on a non-PC speciffi

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-04 Thread Dexter
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, ZN wrote: > A quick question: what do you use for USB? http://www.microchip.com/1010/pline/picmicro/families/16c7xx/devices/16c745/index.htm It's not the easiest or cheapest way to do it, but it gives a lot of flexibility in design. If I was even remotely considering boards

Re: [ql-users] QL Schematic

2002-01-04 Thread ZN
On 1/4/02 at 4:22 PM Dexter wrote: >I'm still looking for a schematic of the QL PCB. Also, the 8049 details. Actually, you do not need the 8049. All it does can be done using a different device and handling the difference on the software side (translation: modified OS code). >I'm thinking of pr