Re: [ql-users] Source Code

2002-05-27 Thread wlenerz
Dave Walker wrote: " >Wolfgang and others >One point that occurs to me is that the current restriction on >electronic distribution of the original source applies to Wolfgang >acting as the registrar? yes. ythink - the sources are several megabytes long. I routinely get about a 2KB/sec

Re: [ql-users] Source Code

2002-05-27 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:34:57AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I for one am a potential new user for SMSQ/E, but only if/when it is running under uQLx. Wee, yousee, what prevents you, from my pont of view, to get SMSQ/E under UQLX, apparently, is not the licence, but the fact

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals

2002-05-27 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:51:22PM +0100, Roy Wood wrote: This is obviously a split we can ill afford, and I feel that although it should not be necessary, it is in our interest to add a clause to the licence that specifically allays the Grafs fears. I believe these to be that either they

RE: [ql-users] QL downloads page

2002-05-27 Thread henk verbeek
Works fine for me. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Dilwyn Jones Verzonden: zondag 26 mei 2002 18:29 Aan: QL Users List (new) Onderwerp: [ql-users] QL downloads page I have been trying to access Giorgio Garabello's software downloads

Re: [ql-users] Source Code

2002-05-27 Thread Roy Wood
In message 004c01c205cc$b4284340$47200150@taff2, Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Consider scenario 1. You accept my proposed changes.  Richard develops UQLX  for SMSQ/E, touts it with  Redhat/SuSe/Mandrake/Slackware/Debian (at least one is already interested) , and as soon as one