[ql-users] Re: Source code sent

2002-06-19 Thread wlenerz
Hi all, I just would like to let everybody know that the source code was sent to all those who requested it - under the current licence. You should have received an individual email telling you that the source code was sent to you. IF YOU HAVE NOT received that email but still requested the

Re: [ql-users] QTYP

2002-06-19 Thread wlenerz
On 14 Jun 2002, at 21:50, Geoff Wicks wrote: > I am surprised you have time for anything given the battering you have had > in the last couple of weeks. :-) (snip of the problem description) > I needed to do a lot of testing to explore the problem further, but did not > have the time. There

RE: [ql-users] Camera

2002-06-19 Thread Norman Dunbar
Morning Peter, I was wondering what a 'pit cures' was when I first read this - then I twigged :o) My Dominican Republic Chrismas Holiday pictures range from 140KB to 622 KB all at 2160 by 1440 pixels, 24bit true colour. It is a nice camera - well worth the Duty Free :o) And it's all true what yo

RE: [ql-users] EasyPtr

2002-06-19 Thread Norman Dunbar
Per, I personally haven't heard anything - but then again, I beleieve we need someone who *understands* all the PE stuff - which I certainly don't. Maybe we need a PE programming guide for assembly freaks in QL Toady (And I won't be writing it, I don't have a clue about assembly, I mean PE

RE: [ql-users] Plight of a Software House

2002-06-19 Thread Norman Dunbar
I wonder how many copies of that damned mini-calculator and the job-watch thingies are hiding on people's (hard) discs then ? H . Regards, the 'Mighty' Dunbar. - Norman Dunbar Database/Unix administrator Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. mailto:[EMAIL PROTE