Greetings,
I would like to know a way to get the number of sectors of a harddisk
attached to a Q40.
I do not want the number of sector of the partition, but really
the number of sector of the whole harddisk.
Does anybody know a way for that ?
(assuming that the disk is directly from the shop, wi
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
The history is documented here
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/754story.html
Superb link... thanks. (How the hell did you find it?).
PS. After having a quick shot at Google to see if I could get to your
link location, I did hit this one:
http://catless.ncl.
P Witte wrote:
TonyTebby writes:
The 68xxx series is 16 bit word oriented (even on the 68008 8 bit bus
version) so a whole word exponent makes sense.
But, by using only 12 bits for the exponent (enough for astonomical
callculations) the 4 MSBs can be used as the "floating point number token"
flag
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can confirm that Ken Bain IS organising the Byfleet show for
9/11.
Christopher Cave
TonyTebby wrote:
> I have always suspected that IEEE format was defined by a committee
> whose primary object was to ensure that "standard" floating point
> numbers could not be handled efficiently in either software or
> microcoded hardware using simple integer operations. The idea being
> to for
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
> >>No good - there is a QL show in Reutlingen planned for that weekend -
> >>well that is what I have in my diary. Jochen can confirm.
> >Sorry getting totally confused here.
> >I am singing in Reutlingen that weekend.
> >By all means have it then, bu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 at 22:08:07, Tony Firshman wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>>
>>On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 at 19:02:02, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>>
>>
>>>A London QUANTA Workshop is to be planne
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gwicks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] Cancelled London Quanta Group meeting - July 2003
>
>> I was under the impression that Ken Bain was organising a Byfleet
>> workshop
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 at 19:02:02, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>
>>A London QUANTA Workshop is to be planned for Sunday 16th November 2003
>>( 3rd Sunday in month to avoid clash problem last year ! ).
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>> A London QUANTA Workshop is to be planned for Sunday 16th November
>2003
>> ( 3rd Sunday in month to avoid clash problem last year ! ).
>Although
>> this is still subject to change depending on availability of QL
>Traders
- Original Message -
From: "Dilwyn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Cancelled London Quanta Group meeting - July 2003
> I was under the impression that Ken Bain was organising a Byfleet
> workshop on 9th November 2003. Does it make sense to have two separate
> workshop
TonyTebby writes:
> The 68xxx series is 16 bit word oriented (even on the 68008 8 bit bus
> version) so a whole word exponent makes sense.
> But, by using only 12 bits for the exponent (enough for astonomical
> callculations) the 4 MSBs can be used as the "floating point number token"
> flag wit
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 at 22:08:07, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 at 19:02:02, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
A London QUANTA Workshop is to be planned for Sunday 16th November 2003
( 3rd Sunday in month to avoid clash problem last year ! ). Al
> A London QUANTA Workshop is to be planned for Sunday 16th November
2003
> ( 3rd Sunday in month to avoid clash problem last year ! ).
Although
> this is still subject to change depending on availability of QL
Traders,
> when exact arrangements are made.
>
>
> Malcolm Cadman - Organiser London QL
>
> P Witte wrote:
> > While were talking fp, can someone please explain what the purpose of
the
> > $81f bias (or whatever the technical term) is? Why not just represent
> > exponents as +/-32k ?
> >
> > Per
> >
> >
Lau replied
>
> It's a bit "historic", I suspect.
>
More than that, it is very
15 matches
Mail list logo