Darren Branagh wrote:
> Ok folks, I've gone and done it.
>
> The 2nd Irish QL show will take place this Summer - over the August
> Bank Holiday weekend, 24th to 26th August, 2002.
> So, Who's Coming?
Hmm... rather short notice for the magazines (especially as the next
issue of QUANTA is a co
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> > Since all the source files I've looked at so far use absolute
> > filenames for all INCLUDEd files, I had resigned myself to
> > creating a dedicated WIN1 :-(
>
> The project is, for include files etc, to refer to files on "dev3_",
> so that later on you can use dev_us
> Although I bought a copy of QMake many years ago (and have kept it
> up-to-date), I have never had sufficient incentive to get to grips
> with it until now.
>
> Having set up a dedicated WIN1 for the SMSQ/E sources and installed
> QMac, QLink and QMake, I tried to build SMSQ_GOLD. However,
> wh
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I have created a test case exactly the same as Per's - and had
> exactly the same results - ram1_abc_asm not found.
Me too!
Please see my reply to Per for my theory on what is going on...
John
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Per Witte wrote:
> Loading the link file into Qmake V4.21 I get:
>
> Error: ram1_abc_asm not found.
>
> Now, you can bet your bottom euro that that file DOES exist! There
> is no explanation as to whats going on, no log file and no other
> error message.
Like Norman, I have duplicated your
> It seems to me that the root of the problem is the command string
> that QMake is sending to QMac, which in turn implies that Jochen,
> Bernt and Marcel have a version of QMac that understands "-XERROR"
> while you, me and Norman do not!
I have now adapted my SB interceptor program (see thread
Jochen Merz wrote:
> well, this could be the solution. The version of QMAC we all have
> (at least Bernd and myself) is 1.06.
>
> Sorry, but it is not quite our fault if the version which Quanta
> delivers is so very much out of date. Our version 1.06 dates back
> to March 1998 ("only" over 4 ye
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> > The problem with this theory is that I have QMac 1.01 which,
> > according to John Gilpin, is still the version that Quanta
> > supply...
>
> Well, I have V1.06 here... (with QLINK 1.03), so this might really
> be the reason.
Yes. Thanks, Marcel.
As I say, I have now f
Duncan Neithercut wrote:
> Can you tell me which version you are using. I released 1.03 then
> 1.04 and finally 1.05 all very rapidly this month as a result of
> feed back from Claus Graf.
> Can you also tell me a bit more about what QCDEZE was doing when the
> error was reported.
> A little bit
Phoebus wrote:
> >> Also, does anybody have info on how the QXL talks to the
> >> ISA bus? It would be interesting (to say the least) to put the
> >> QXL there and use it together with the Q40 ;-
> >
> >Well, the sources are all there...
> >
> >Marcel
>
> ? don't have them... YET :-) Just get
Tony Tebby wrote:
> Dennis Smith states that "We have been producing the Q60 for over a
> year" and "Licence money has been paid" - who was this licence money
> paid to? I certainly did not get it.
As one of the punters who paid D&D Systems an extra 30ukp to supply
SMSQ/E with my Q60, I am disma
Phoebus Dokos wrote:
> Does anyone have a newer version of MKPART than the one that
> shipped with SMSQ/E 2.91? (Or at least some instructions for it?)
D&D Systems supplied MKPART 1.02 with my Q60.
> Mine acts up big time, the numbers it shows make no sense and I
> suspect it cannot read my H
> Which reminds me - I plan on having another Irish Piss-up (its never
> really a show, as we spend more time at the pub that the show venue)
> at the end of August. I will annouce dates soon, but can anybody
> attend this one? It was really a traders only event last year except
>
> Well guys, which is it?
>
> The bank Hol will be busy here - there is always an invasion from
> the UK then. The following weekend the kids are back to school...
>
> weekend of the 23rd or the 30th??
I vote for the 30th :-)
John
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich Mellor wrote:
> The problem with writing these programs is if you want to change the
> screen colour depth and resolution to fit your application (why
> should QWord use the standard QL colours on QPC2 when it can switch
> into high colour mode).
IMHO, a program should *never* change the co
15 matches
Mail list logo
