Re: [ql-users] Software pirates in our midst?

2002-11-10 Thread Lafe McCorkle
Tony Firshman wrote: On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 at 14:45:21, dndsystems1 wrote: (ref: <00a501c287fe$d1851d00$4f6887d9@asusone>) I know from what you have said that you have used [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a redundant address that I use for reading this list, nothing else. If anythi

Re: [ql-users] Di-ren kbd i/f

2002-10-22 Thread Lafe McCorkle
Phoebus: You are correct. The interface plugs into the coprocessor socket rather than the rom socket. Lafe Phoebus Dokos wrote: At 09:40 ðì 22/10/2002, you wrote: Phoebus: I just took a look at my Di-ren kbd if. It is plugged into the rom socket (I think). It has a Hermes chip plugged

Re: [ql-users] QL Keyboard Membranes - moving on

2002-10-17 Thread Lafe McCorkle
Now do you see this?--- | V ÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÓÔÕÖ×ØÙ (This shouldn't appear right once you open the email... should look like question marks but should read right in the Preview of Eudora) Phoebus It looks like the Greek al

Re: [ql-users] Parcelfarce

2002-09-27 Thread Lafe McCorkle
There seems to be a lot of discussion on how e-mailers are formatting the messages. Have you considered that your e-mail readers may be presenting the e-mail as you have instructed them. If you are sending and receiving plain text the receiver should receive plain text, unless the email rea

Re: [ql-users] A IE 6.0 patch

2002-08-30 Thread Lafe McCorkle
John G Hitchcock wrote: >Re Peter's : > > >John, this is how it went > >1. I received an original message frm 'tony'. It had two files attached >purporting to be an IE6 patch for windoze. > >2. This looked suspicious, I downloaded the files without opening them. They >h

Re: [ql-users] A IE 6.0 patch

2002-08-27 Thread Lafe McCorkle
tony wrote: > RAV AntiVirus has deleted this file because it contained dangerous code!

Re: [ql-users] HTML emails - what a pain !

2002-08-20 Thread Lafe McCorkle
I did not receive the message you commented on because it may be worse than you think. The message that I received was: 'RAV Antiviris deleted this email because it contained a virus. Lafe Norman Dunbar wrote: >The message 'to class' allegedly from Ron, is in HTML format and carries a >pay

Re: [ql-users] Camera

2002-06-05 Thread Lafe McCorkle
but I think it is the same as >you have, the DC215. We have already used the CFD (Compact Flash >Device as we call it) sucessfully with the Q60. > >Any more suggestions on cameras, anyone? > I have a Canon S10 that I like a lot. Canons, S10 and other models, also use the CFDs. On my PCs I have USB readers that make the transfer of pictures a lot easier. The SanDisk readers that I have are hot swapable. Note that not all CFD camera formats are the same. One should always format the CFD in the camera, rather than the computer, and be careful if switching between cameras. Lafe McCorkle > >Dennis - D&D Systems > > > > >

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals

2002-06-05 Thread Lafe McCorkle
P Witte wrote: >wlenerz writes: > > > >>On 29 May 2002, at 20:50, Lafe McCorkle wrote: >> >> >> >>>>What about 2.99, 2.A0, 2.A1 ,2.A2 all the way to 2.FF? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>

Re: [ql-users] Source Code

2002-05-30 Thread Lafe McCorkle
Claude Mourier 00 wrote: >At last someone positive ! > >Claude > >-Message d'origine- >De : P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Envoyé : vendredi 24 mai 2002 00:35 >À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Objet : Re: [ql-users] Source Code > > > >This license debacle goes over my head in part as I find

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E proposals

2002-05-29 Thread Lafe McCorkle
o 2.FF? > Nothing wrong with putting a little Hex on it to stay in space. Lafe McCorkle > >