In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ZN
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>OK, I was persuaded. But the results are very dissapointing. It works at
>25MHz, as it should since the CPU is rated for that frequency. But anything
>over that is a no-go. At 28MHz it kept crashing, at 29.44 it wouldn't even
>reset.
On 30/08/02 at 22:22 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>>> 1. Have anybody successfully overclocked the SGC? If yes to which
freq.?
>> Yes, I have, but only to 25MHz - because I only had oscillators for less
>> or equal to that, which could fit the space.
> Define "MAY be persuaded" :=
OK, I was
On 01/09/02 at 11:02 Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
>I believe Nasta wanted the lrespred v. 2.01 which was not included on my
>disks... maybe Ron has a copy of it?
>
>Phoebus
Actually, either will help as the GAL code has to work on both. 2.01 is
preferred, I will need it to do a final test on SuperID
??? 1/9/2002 10:37:31 ??, ?/? Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
I believe Nasta wanted the lrespred v. 2.01 which was not included on my disks...
maybe Ron has a copy of it?
Phoebus
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 12:15:21, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 00:05:43, ZN wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>
>>A long time ago, when the lrespr version of the driver came out, Phil
>>Borman also mentioned locations that needed to be patched if Qubi
Davide Santachiara wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Phil sent me the lrespred version. It was v1.54 or
> similar. The only problem is where to find it. I'll try to give a
> look at my old floppy disks ... if nobody will answer in the
> meanwhile ;-)
1.56 is freely available on the web: http://www.pborm
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 00:05:43, ZN wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>A long time ago, when the lrespr version of the driver came out, Phil
>Borman also mentioned locations that needed to be patched if Qubide was set
>to an address different than the ROM port. If you have the lrespr version
>so
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 at 12:29:08, Davide Santachiara wrote:
(ref: <004c01c251a2$88332440$0200a8c0@ergonnotebook>)
>Hello Nasta,
>
>> A long time ago, when the lrespr version of the driver came out, Phil
>> Borman also mentioned locations that needed to be patched if Qubide was set
>> to an addres
Hello Nasta,
> A long time ago, when the lrespr version of the driver came out, Phil
> Borman also mentioned locations that needed to be patched if Qubide was set
> to an address different than the ROM port. If you have the lrespr version
> somewhere, I would apreciate an email with it attac
>>On 30/08/02 at 22:22 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>>>1. Have anybody successfully overclocked the SGC? If yes to which freq.?
>> Yes, I have, but only to 25MHz - because I only had oscillators for less
>> or equal to that, which could fit the space... I may be persuaded to try
it
>> again
> Define "
??? 31/8/2002 2:30:18 ??, ?/? "ZN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>On 30/08/02 at 22:22 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>
>>Hello all,
>>Since I have finally returned its about time, I ask one of my famous crazy
>
>>set of questions ;-)
>>
>>Here goes:
>>
>>1. Have anybody successfully overclocked the SGC?
On 30/08/02 at 22:22 Phoebus Dokos wrote:
>Hello all,
>Since I have finally returned its about time, I ask one of my famous crazy
>set of questions ;-)
>
>Here goes:
>
>1. Have anybody successfully overclocked the SGC? If yes to which freq.?
Yes, I have, but only to 25MHz - because I only had
12 matches
Mail list logo
