On Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 01:49:58PM -0600, D. Carlos Knowlton wrote:
That message you see is from qmail-remote. So qmail is trying to deliver
this message to host t1-mast. You must add this name in the control/locals
file for qmail to deliver to your host locally.
Also, qmail requires DNS. If
Hi,
This is something I'd be interested in too - and I suspect
others on the list, so please don't take the discussion "Offline".
I was looking at exactly this a while back, with a view to
manipulating E-mail messages to add e.g. "This E-mail
brought to you by... etc.". I didn't look in depth,
Sorry for being off-topic, but I have a small crisis on my hands. I've just
been handed the administration of a machine, and its /var/mail containing
mbox files is 100% full. qpopper is unable to make temporary drop copies
for users POPping email. I know there are many mailboxes with old messages
Anand Buddhdev writes:
Sorry for being off-topic, but I have a small crisis on my hands. I've just
been handed the administration of a machine, and its /var/mail containing
mbox files is 100% full. qpopper is unable to make temporary drop copies
for users POPping email. I know there are
At 14:00 99-03-02 +, Russell Nelson wrote:
Anand Buddhdev writes:
Sorry for being off-topic, but I have a small crisis on my
hands. I've just
been handed the administration of a machine, and its /var/mail
containing
mbox files is 100% full. qpopper is unable to make temporary
drop
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 02:37:34PM +, Martijn Koster wrote:
My questions are:
- what methods are other people using to check up on supervise?
- is it worth including this functionality in the base distribution,
using esvc or some other mechanism?
From daemontools-2.0:
man supervise
Jacek Czerwinski wrote:
qmail MUST have DNS (caching named plus LAN adresses ?), q. don't use
/etc/hosts.
Surely you mean that qmail uses the resolver, who in turn may use the
DNS ? Or does qmail make direct DNS requests ?
Because this is quite different, the resolver may be configured to
Text written by Andrew Richards at 11:36 AM 3/2/99 +0100:
I was looking at exactly this a while back, with a view to
manipulating E-mail messages to add e.g. "This E-mail
brought to you by... etc.". I didn't look in depth, but a
couple of issues I noticed were,
- What to do with multipart
unsubscribe.
Hello all,
I've got the following problem that has started occuring recently.
(To the best of my knowledge, nothing major has changed). It seems to
be happing more and more frequently.
If I have a group of messages in Maildir/new (say 10 messages) and
number 8 is large ( ~4 MB or so) when
At 10:58 AM 3/2/99 -0500, Timothy L. Mayo wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jacek Czerwinski wrote:
qmail MUST have DNS (caching named plus LAN adresses ?), q. don't use
/etc/hosts.
Surely you mean that qmail uses the resolver, who in turn may use the
DNS ? Or does
Hello All,
I am running qmail v1.03, but when I try to telnet to my SMTP port
(25) it takes upwards of 60 seconds or more to respond. Does anyone have
an idea as to what could be wrong? I am using tcpserver to control qmail's
control
-Bill
You might want to look into the -H and -R options associated with tcpserver.
Naturally you'll want to ensure they are relevant before using them.
Regards.
At 01:18 PM 3/2/99 -0800, Bill Parker wrote:
Hello All,
I am running qmail v1.03, but when I try to telnet to my SMTP port
(25)
I'm considering switching to Postfix. The reasons are long, so I
won't go into that here.
The thing is I have several hundred ezmlm maintained mailing lists at
this point.
Has anyone hacked ezmlm to be driven from and drive Postfix rather
than QMail?
--Michael
No can do until postfix directly supports VERP. This has been discussed on
the
postfix list I believe.
The particular features that ezmlm uses are discussed in the QMAIL EXTENSIONS
sections of addresses(5).
Regards.
At 15:37 2/03/99 -0800, Michael Graff wrote:
I'm considering switching to
Hi all,
A week or two ago, I posted a message asking if it was possible
to rewrite outgoing mail. The problem is that I belong to
two organisations, with exclusive sets of recipients for each
organisation. I would like to ensure that an outgoing message
always has the correct from address,
FastWeb writes:
What is the syntax for the name.cdb file to re-write a
from or return-path header?
See the ofmipname man page:
# From: "Joe Shmoe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Joe Shmoe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There's no support for wildcards. If a user's MUA isn't smart enough to
What was wrong with the following (admittedly not hightech) solution:
(it is assumed that the local host is bbconsult.co.uk, and do the
substitutions
somewhereelse.co.uk - fruitconsultants.co.uk
dom - bannas
)
Do you have more than one domain you need to use these mappings?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
haha: hehe, hihi
Messages to haha are forwarded to hehe@defaultdomain and
hihi@defaultdomain.
hehe: jijisa
hihi: jijisa, airheech
fastforward doesn't know whether your hehe and hihi wildcards cover
hehe@defaultdomain and hihi@defaultdomain. Presumably you want
On 3 Mar 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Also: is it possible to rewrite the Return-Path header
and not touch the From header?
No. Why would a user want that?
Well, for one, a user that's subscribed to an ezmlm mailing list that has
posts restricted to subscribers might want to be able to
On 3 Mar 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Also: is it possible to rewrite the Return-Path header
and not touch the From header?
No. Why would a user want that?
Well, for one, a user that's subscribed to an ezmlm mailing list that has
posts restricted to subscribers
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On 3 Mar 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Also: is it possible to rewrite the Return-Path header
and not touch the From header?
No. Why would a user want that?
Well, for one, a user that's subscribed to an ezmlm mailing
Could someone refresh my memory why the maximum value for concurrencyremote is
255? I searched the archives and found where people said this but I didn't
find out why the limit is 255. No matter what I do I can't squeeze out more
than 254 concurrent qmail-remote's. Running multiple qmail queues
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 08:42:02PM -0500, James Smallacombe wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On 3 Mar 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Also: is it possible to rewrite the Return-Path header
and not touch the From header?
No. Why would a user want
Martin Green writes:
If I mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- the message should be from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- the message should be from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What if you send a message to both of them?
What if you send a message to a
At 04:22 3/03/99 -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Glenn writes:
What's needed for Windows is a simple, but configurable program that
runs on the user's machine and listens to localhost:25.
Right. MUAs can use 127.0.0.1:25 (and 127.0.0.1:110) by default. An ISP
can supply its favorite proxy
Mark Delany writes:
At 04:22 3/03/99 -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Glenn writes:
What's needed for Windows is a simple, but configurable program that
runs on the user's machine and listens to localhost:25.
Right. MUAs can use 127.0.0.1:25 (and 127.0.0.1:110) by default. An ISP
can
27 matches
Mail list logo
