Re: daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Greg Hudson wrote: the daemontools binaries are included, they are, like all DJB software other than Qmail itself, under PD (not GPL). Public domain would mean you can do anything you want with it. You can't; in particular, you are not allowed to distribute

qmail Digest 21 Aug 1999 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 735

1999-08-21 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 21 Aug 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 735 Topics (messages 29261 through 29302): Mail Filter of my own 29261 by: Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29269 by: Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qmail and IMAP 29262 by: "Bongo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Viewing cyclog logs

Re: daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: Other products are in the public domain (e.g. cdb or checkpassword). And other products are simply copyrighted with NO permission to redistribute granted at all (e.g. mess822, or libtai). umm, isn't libtai part of the cyclog package as it is? and

RE: I've been doing some relay testing.

1999-08-21 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ben Kosse wrote: Actually, ORBS hasn't listed us. That e-mail touched precicely 3 systems: the client, the one I'm building, and our internal Exchange box. It ended up in our *INTERNAL* e-mail server as an undeliverable message. qmail tried to send it to someone inside

auth/identd?

1999-08-21 Thread John Conover
Qmail does not use auth/identd, right? Thanks, John -- John Conover, 631 Lamont Ct., Campbell, CA., 95008, USA. VOX 408.370.2688, FAX 408.379.9602, whois '!JC154' [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www2.inow.com/~conover/john.html

Patched source for pine 4.1 w/ Maildir support WAS Re: pine patches

1999-08-21 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: What you wrote about patches and nonprogrammers was exactly my point; for nonprogrammers (and I assume many mail administrators may not be), it is hard to figure out which patches they need to get for what they want. www.qmail.org is a great help, but

Re: auth/identd?

1999-08-21 Thread Magnus Bodin
On 21 Aug 1999, John Conover wrote: Qmail does not use auth/identd, right? Not qmail-smtpd, but tcpserver does. See TCPREMOTEINFO in both tcpserver(1), -r and -R and furher in tcp-environ(5). /magnus -- "MOST USELESS site of the year 1998" -- http://x42.com/urlcalc/

Re: auth/identd?

1999-08-21 Thread Jedi/Sector One
John Conover wrote: Qmail does not use auth/identd, right? Qmail itself does not need identd. But tcpserver and tcp-env can ask that info if needed. -- Frank DENIS aka Jedi/Sector One aka DJ Chrysalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Software : http://www.jedi.claranet.fr -

RE: recommended pltform?

1999-08-21 Thread Lyndon Griffin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Have you got some vmstat/iostat figures? Here's iostat and vmstat from a box currently cranking out: I'm not ashamed to say I have no clue what these mean... /home/lgriffin/$ iostat 5 tty dad0 fd0 sd2

Re: qmail-Linux-distribution

1999-08-21 Thread Keith Burdis
On Fri 1999-08-20 (15:55), Kevin Waterson wrote: Ira Abramov wrote: BeroLinux already did that, then Qmail disappeared when it was merged into Mandrake Linux. I sugest you switch to Mandrake as a platform (I love it. it's also recompiled for Pentium entirely) and ask them to add a