Either I've totally misunderstood your question or else I think you have
misunderstood what /etc/inetd.conf is for. inetd is a daemon listening
for incoming connections from a user on all the ports listed in the
file, and upon connection inetd then starts the corresponding program
which will then
I have Qmail installed on a FreeBSD 3.2 box and want to allow users to
check their mail via POP3 clients- I downloaded and installed the
checkpassed package- but I believe tat I have to add a line to my startup
files- what is it??
Thanks,
bernie
hi,all
My system: RH v6.0 qmail-1.03 tcp-server maildrop-0.70
mess8.22 ( ofmipd instead of smtpd ) serialmail
* /etc/ofmipd.cdb: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: personal name:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I send to email, find email From: and Return-Path: header
[EMAIL PROTECTED] change to
hi,all
my system: rh v6.0 qmail-1.03 maildrop-0.70 vchkpw-3.4.6
I can setup /etc/userdb.dat in term of help, but i'm using vchkpw package
for "virtual" accounts . I don't know to how to use /etc/userdb.dat.
Would you please tell me an example?
thanks
xww
Stephen,
A kill -HUP seems to always work for me.
J.P. Racine
Thot Networks
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 1:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: restarting qmail
>
>
> I just added a new virtual domain to
I just added a new virtual domain to a qmail server and am curious as
to the best/easiest way to restart qmail so it will see the changes
in the rcpthosts and virtualdomains file under /var/qmail/control.
So far a kill -ALRM does not seem to get qmail-send to reread the
virtualdomains file.
: If these are similar systems doing similar workloads, there's
: something "wrong" with the first system. The difference between the
: vmstat output formats implies that they're running different OS revs,
: which could be enough to explain the variance.
Actually, these two cases are similiar mac
Ok, this question was offered in this list thousent times certainly but I have
no sollution for the following: I need the qmail-cyprus-patch. All my attempts
to get 'http://www.periapt.com/qmail-cyrus/' end with an error 404. Does anyone
know an other URL for this patch and where can I get a good
There is a imap maildir modified source tar ball on
http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/
I don't know if it supports all the features correctly. However,
it has been tested by several isp system admin's. They reported
success.
Here is the text from the page:
vchkpw now support IMAP!
opT from efnet
Eventually I found out the source of the problem.
For some reasons, the .bashrc file was missing in the home directory.
After copying that back and
giving the appropriate rights, qmail can start now.
Thanks.
Tong
--
>Hello Everyone.
>I used Redhat Linux 5.2.
>I could not star
can qmail live without an entry in /etc/inetd.conf on solaris 7?
can it just be happy with the following in /etc/init.d/inetsvc:
csh -f '/var/qmail/rc' &
echo "qmail started..."
/basit
Does the binary support Virtual Domains? In particular, I'm interested in domains
administered by Inter7's GUI.
David Harris wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > How exactly do you patch Qmail-imap 4.5 so that i
> > handle Maildirs correctly?
>
> Why do you say patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> How exactly do you patch Qmail-imap 4.5 so that i
> handle Maildirs correctly?
Why do you say patch the "Qmail-imap 4.5"? Almost sounds like you are referring
to an RPM that someone has created. If so, you need to know that a binary RPM
can n
How exactly do you patch Qmail-imap 4.5 so that i
handle Maildirs correctly?
/Victor
Hy, my qmail crash suddenly.
The message is:
oh no! lost spawn connection! dying...
Does anybody suggest what could make it crash ?
My system is freebsd 3-2 Stable, and the only thing bad here is the
problem related to qmail, my system uptime is 48 days, this only machine
is a ftp, ssh, http, p
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Denis Voitenko wrote:
> Are there any known IMAP servers that would work with Maildir?
Check out David Harris excellent patch-fix for the UW-IMAP server.
http://www.davideous.com/imap-maildir/
--
magnus
-- MOST useless 1998 * http://x42.com/
Denis Voitenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Are there any known IMAP servers that would work with Maildir?
http://www.davideous.com/imap-maildir/
- David Harris
Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services
Matthew Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> procs memoryswapiosystem cpu
> r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
>10 0 0 1308 3888 5856 54780 0 0 17 150 427 2163 20 76 4
>
> procs memor
Okay, I lose credibility here for responding on-list when I said I
wouldn't, but I just couldn't let a whopper this size pass...
In the immortal words of Cris Daniluk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> There are no current court cases.
Oh yes there are. AOL vs Cyberpromo. Fascinating case, I suggest y
Are there any known IMAP servers that would work with Maildir?
In the immortal words of Fabrice Scemama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Is Nathan trying to explain that qmail sends mail so fast that it
> can't be natural ? ;-)
Heh, there is an element of that. Parallelizing MTAs such as qmail
and Postfix present a challenge when doing frequency analysis.
However,
I've noticed /var/qmail/queue/mess getting quite full lately, almost as if
qmail-clean has died. However, it is still running. When I stop/restart
the queue functions (qmail-clean, etc.), the queue shrinks back to normal
quickly. I'm running qmail-1.03+patches under RH Linux 6.0 (kernel
2.2.5-2
remove
I think you should read the man page for svscan and multilog. Then
you will come up with a better setup.
Mate
Okay, here goes again. One machine does this:
procs memoryswapiosystem cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
4 2 1 1308 4660 7108 53960 0 0 17 285 17 9 21 32
10 0 0 1308 4372 7124 53828 0
>There are no current court cases. There is, however, strong legal basis. I
>sell content to a customer which I deliver via email. You cut my route to my
>customer who has an email account with you. That prevents us from fulfilling
>our end of the deal between us and our customer. They paid us mon
Hi I'm new,
Is this where I complain about the mail.com stuff?
Think about it,
J.P. Racine
Thot Networks
> A better question: how can anybody NOT?
If you want to run a mail SERVICE then you need to provide the ability to
send and recieve mail to/from anyone anywhere. Sure, if you can catch a
spammer then block it. But by your OWN ADMISSION flitering the bad guy
rarely works. They just change who/
I've made a small modification to multilog in daemontools, and written a
perl script which will allow me to tail through the cycling log just as if
it were a single text file. The way it works is, multilog will write a line
to the effect of "CLOSING LOG FILE" when it is about to cycle to a new
Einar Bordewich writes:
> Actually I'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain some wisdom around qmail and
>it's solution. I think the subject "Re: Lobby mail.com" and it's legal issues is some
>kind of boring now. (Time to stop or move to another list for legal issues?)
>
> What I really wou
Cris Daniluk writes:
> There are no current court cases. There is, however, strong legal basis. I
> sell content to a customer which I deliver via email. You cut my route to my
> customer who has an email account with you. That prevents us from fulfilling
> our end of the deal between us and our
Cris Daniluk writes:
> This may sound rude, but it's not intended to be--what country do you live
> in? I think you're either under a different set of laws, or have a
> fundamental misunderstanding of them.
My understanding of laws comes from established precedents - AOL versus
Cyberpromo, and P
YES! Please move this flame war off line! Thanks.
Einar Bordewich wrote:
>
> Actually I'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain some wisdom around qmail and
> it's solution. I think the subject "Re: Lobby mail.com" and it's legal issues is some
> kind of boring now. (Time to stop or
qmail Digest 3 Sep 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 748
Topics (messages 29729 through 29806):
qmail and forwarding
29729 by: Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Any ideas?
29730 by: Matthew Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
29731 by: "Daniluk, Cris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 03 Sep 1999 at 11:22:11 +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 12:32:20AM -0500, Cesar A. Iriarte wrote:
>
> If you use tcpserver, use the rules file to deny connections from the IP
> of that host. man tcprules. If you use tcp_wrappers, use the
> /etc/hosts.deny file to bl
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 12:32:20AM -0500, Cesar A. Iriarte wrote:
If you use tcpserver, use the rules file to deny connections from the IP
of that host. man tcprules. If you use tcp_wrappers, use the
/etc/hosts.deny file to block connections from the IP address.
> Hi,
>
> I would like to block
Actually I'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to gain some wisdom around qmail and
it's solution. I think the subject "Re: Lobby mail.com" and it's legal issues is some
kind of boring now. (Time to stop or move to another list for legal issues?)
What I really would like, is someone telling me ho
37 matches
Mail list logo
