best way to handle postmaster

1999-11-06 Thread David Harris
Hi, I'm kind of tired of having double bounces end up in the root mailbox, so I'd like to setup some way to have the postmaster account handle these automatically. Right now I don't even look at them, so I could just /dev/null them, but I'd like to do something slightly better. I know that the

Usage of /var/qmail/users/assign

1999-11-06 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
I'm not 100% sure I understand the difference in intended usage between setting up a ~/alias/.qmail-whatever file and setting up a virtual user in /var/qmail/users/assign. As far as I can tell, the former uses forwarding, whereas the latter is acting like a true alias. Am I understanding this

Qmail and Webmail

1999-11-06 Thread Nik Gibson
I can't seem to get qmail to work with webmail. Does anyone have any experience with Webmail? When I start webmail up it runs on port 6789. I can hit the port but when I try to log in I get "document contains no data". It works fine on another machine I have running sendmail so I think it has

Re: best way to handle postmaster

1999-11-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 04:05:15PM -0500, David Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [He doesn't want to see double bounces.] How about a autoresponder at the postmaster account which simply replies saying "to speak to a live human operator, please e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and /dev/null's the

RE: best way to handle postmaster

1999-11-06 Thread David Harris
Bruno Wolff III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: There isn't any point in doing this for double bounces. Double bounces are caused when both the recipient and sender addresses are munged. No automated response to a double bounce is going to be useful. At our site I estimate 80-90% of the

RE: mailquotacheck and quota.patch

1999-11-06 Thread Andres Mendez
It's true, sorry. I checked it using the same e-mail for RCPT and FROM. Mailquotacheck works OK. - Original Message - From: Benjamin de los Angeles Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: QMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 1999 4:41 PM Subject: RE:

Re: ezmlm problems

1999-11-06 Thread Frederik Lindberg
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 09:47:52AM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: When I create a list with: ezmlm-make -rdugm -5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ /var/qmail/ezmlm/test \ /var/qmail/ezmlm/.qmail-test \ ronald-test \ wiplinger.org I assume 'wplinger.org' is a virtual domain owned

Re: X-Face headers

1999-11-06 Thread Russell Nelson
David L. Nicol writes: Is there any way to see these if you don't have XFmail? Would a preprocessor that converts them into attached inline MIME gifs be too too too tricky? Probably not. Pestering Mozilla.org wish list to replace the Customizable N-Thing with the X-Face would result

A different kind of problem

1999-11-06 Thread Wal Haidar
Helo All, I have a problem and not too sure how to go about solving it. We have an ezmlm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] which has been running fine for a long time. We would like to outsource xyz.com and run a free email package on it. Now due to this free email (which we dont have much control