RE: Getting rid of headers

> >> Received: from unknown (HELO mail02.cavtel.net) (64.83.0.22) > >> by www.graycastle.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2000 03:50:59 - > > > > Does it belong to you? If it does, change the reverse lookup for its IP > > address to say something else. If it doesn't, then too bad. If you're > > removing

FW: Getting rid of headers

> Received: from unknown (HELO mail02.cavtel.net) (64.83.0.22) > by www.graycastle.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2000 03:50:59 - Does it belong to you? If it does, change the reverse lookup for its IP address to say something else. If it doesn't, then too bad. If you're removing the headers, what d

Getting rid of headers

Hi, I am running Qmail + Vpopmail + Qmailadmin + Autorespond on a machine running RH 6.1. When replying, the autoresponder includes the following headers in the reply: Received: (qmail 28678 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2000 03:50:59 - Received: from unknown (HELO mail02.cavtel.net) (64.83

Slow Server

Hi there, My qmail server is extremely slow after I changed the ip address on my server, what is going on? My ISP had to make changed in the DNS. I'am using qmail 1.03 with Redhat 6.0. Thanks in advance, Miguel Omar Carvajal

Re: strange problem with t-online

Check the permissions on your user t's Maildir - Original Message - From: "wolfgang zeikat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "qmailist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 6:02 PM Subject: strange problem with t-online > in the course of some mailing list activity i keep getti

RE: Urgent

missing the closing double quote before /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd -- Michael Boyiazis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail Architect, NetZero, Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Sean Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:57 PM > To: Qmail Mail List > Subject: Urgen

Routing undeliverable mail - .qmail-default, without header rewrite

Hi all I am currently using ~alias/.qmail-default to route all locally undeliverable mail to another host which will know how to deliver it, via the following line: | forward "$LOCAL"@mail.hillsong.com However, I would prefer to route the mail through mail.hillsong.com instead of forward it to th

strange problem with t-online

in the course of some mailing list activity i keep getting this error: Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 970188821.500534 starting delivery 142187: msg 582933 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 970188821.500693 status: local 1/10 remote 1/20 Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 9701

qmail-popup's implementation of LAST

Dug around in the archives, but searching on the keyword "LAST" doesn't seem to work well. A user is trying to POP his mail. He's got quite a huge amount of messages, and would like to leave them on the server. As i understand it, the POP client should send the LAST command to see what messages

Re: Urgent

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:40:11PM -0700, Sean peterson wrote: > Point taken, but the question still remains, for what reason would the > smtp.cdb file not be able to be read by tcpserver? I have even recompiled > ucspi-tcp and rebuilt the cdb. It's already been explained on the list - perhaps yo

Re: Urgent

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:10:35PM -0700, Sean peterson wrote: > Here is the output from you advice; > mail# ls -ld /etc /etc/tcpcontrol /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb > drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 5632 Sep 28 15:48 /etc > drwxr-x--- 3 root wheel 512 Sep 28 15:49 /etc/tcpcontrol > -rw-r--r-- 1 ro

Re: Urgent

Point taken, but the question still remains, for what reason would the smtp.cdb file not be able to be read by tcpserver? I have even recompiled ucspi-tcp and rebuilt the cdb. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sean peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Urgent

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:10:35PM -0700, Sean peterson wrote: > The missing double quote was a typo in the email only, I have since removed Well, the email is all we have - how do we know that in advance? > the rblsmtpd from the line and I still get the access denied error. > > The problem is

Re: Urgent

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:10:35PM -0700, Sean peterson wrote: [snip] > The problem is the access denied error and not the rblsmtpd. > > Here is the output from you advice; > mail# ls -ld /etc /etc/tcpcontrol /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb > drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 5632 Sep 28 15:48 /etc > drwxr-x-

Re: Urgent

The missing double quote was a typo in the email only, I have since removed the rblsmtpd from the line and I still get the access denied error. The problem is the access denied error and not the rblsmtpd. Here is the output from you advice; mail# ls -ld /etc /etc/tcpcontrol /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.

Re: Urgent

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:56:45PM -0700, Sean Peterson wrote: > I am currently running qmail-1.03 with tcpserver. > > I attempted to update the rblsmtpd to utilize RSS when all hell broke > loose. > > Now when I start tcpserver with the following command (All on one line); > > /usr/local/bin/t

Urgent

I am currently running qmail-1.03 with tcpserver. I attempted to update the rblsmtpd to utilize RSS when all hell broke loose. Now when I start tcpserver with the following command (All on one line); /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -u $QMAILDUSER -g $QMAILDGROUP -p -x /etc/tcpcontrol/tcp/smtp.cdb -c 6

Re: TLS

* Daniel Crow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm very new to the Qmail package and I was just wondering if it > supported TSL (trusted link security). http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~vermeule/qmail/tls.patch -- Robin S. Socha

test

ping

defaulthost

I am having a brain cramp :> i have set my /var/qmail/control/defaulthost as blah.net and chmodded etc as per the FAQ.  I have done this right in the past, just know i am forgetting one thing.      qmail: 970123416.298036 info msg 49219: bytes 446 from user@blah.blah.net qp 449 ui

TLS

I'm very new to the Qmail package and I was just wondering if it supported TSL (trusted link security). Thanks! Dan

RE: Problems with relaying !

hi, > BUT any hosts can use my server for relayng !!! is your ~/qmail/control/rcpthosts set up properly? if that does not exist, qmail will relay happily ... ;) a == Alexander Jernejcic email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] begin LOVE-LETTER-UN

Re: su to alias on RH

Quoted from Mate Wierdl: > We are talking about setting up ezmlm mailinglists under ~alias. On the system I run, alias has shell /bin/false. I get into the alias account using a setuid program called listmanage, a program I wrote specifically for the purpose of managing lists under the alias u

Re: problems with qmailanalog utils

Jens, You need to find "tai64nfrac" and run it on the logs produced by multilog in order to convert the tai64 time stamps to the fractional ones expected by zoverall. Henry > hi brett, > > thanks for your hint with multilog. now it works ! and, yes, i know lwq > and it's great ! > > ps: zoveral

Re: Opening a Port

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 02:26:40PM -0300, Mark Walsh wrote: > I need to open port 443 on my Linux Firewall. How do I do that? Ask a Linux list. This is the qmail list. Ben -- Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAILER-DAEMON

Opening a Port

I need to open port 443 on my Linux Firewall. How do I do that? Mark

Re: Web management for 5000+ mailboxes

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:45:09AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: > 9.28.2000 > > Hey folks, > > OK, we are sold on Qmail (we're running it for our virtual hosting > customers), and would like to use it to phase out a Post.Office installation > with about 5000 active mailboxes. > > Its important

Re: Web management for 5000+ mailboxes

Drew Linsalata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For virtual domain customers (under 50 mailboxes per domain), using > vpopmail/qmailadmin works great for web management, but for a single domain > with this many mailboxes, what is everyone doing? > > Its important for us to provide our help desk fo

Re: comparison vmailmgr - inter7

On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:11:53PM -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrote: > vmailmgr DOES work with RPMs. However, the CGI web interface that comes with > it is incomplete to the point of not functioning. Add undocumented... I don't suppose you read the "vmailmgr-cgi.html" file, located both in the d

Re: Unable to read controls

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:25:06PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:41:03AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > > Just to be pedantic, The 'r' bit is for listing the directory, but the > > 'x' bit controls access to the files in the directory. So, qmail would > > have been able t

Re: Unable to read controls

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:49:52AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Mea culpa. Thanks for the correction. I suppose I should have realized > that, as qmail shouldn't need to list files -- the filenames are hardcoded, > correct? Yes. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> htt

Web management for 5000+ mailboxes

9.28.2000 Hey folks, OK, we are sold on Qmail (we're running it for our virtual hosting customers), and would like to use it to phase out a Post.Office installation with about 5000 active mailboxes. For virtual domain customers (under 50 mailboxes per domain), using vpopmail/qmailadmin works gr

Re: procmail error

Ramzi Abdallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sep 28 11:16:54 intranet qmail: 970100214.227272 delivery 2: success: >procmail:_Lock_failure_on_"/var/spool/mail/rsa.lock"/did_0+0+2/ > >any idea what might be causing this?? 1) That's really a procmail question, but... 2) Permissions? Stale lock? Alre

RE: dash addresses failing

> A test to [EMAIL PROTECTED] completes properly. > > A test to [EMAIL PROTECTED], ... > fails, and I don't understand what I'm missing. Does the file ~lists/.qmail-jobs exist? If not, how about ~alias/.qmail-lists-jobs? If not, that's probably the problem. Read the

Re: qmail with vpopmail

Philip Priest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First of all, you seem to have posted a message with a new subject as a response to an unrelated message. This makes it difficult for people who thread mailing lists to see your message is a new question, rather than a reply to a previous one. Please cor

Re: Problems with relaying !

Kornyakov Yevgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have problems whith relaying: > I use tcpserver and my file tcp.smtp > contain next lines [...] > and I started qmail: > > #!/bin/bash > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -c100 -x/etc/smtp.cdb -R -H -u 7770 -g 2108 0 smtp [...] Did you remember to rerun t

Re: relaying

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Petr Novotny wrote: > On 28 Sep 2000, at 19:20, Alan Chung wrote: > > > I am trying to setup some relaying for tcp.smtp server. > > > > Can I put domain name instead of IP address in /etc/tcp.smtp-rules? > > No, unless you do some serious patching. mee@host:/local/src/uc

Re: Stack Smashing

Doug Preston writes: > Is (has) anyone looked into using something like immunix.org's compiler to > protect qmail/vpopmail etc. from > stack smashing attacks? > > Is anyone familiar with the exposure of these programs to this type of attack? Haven't looked at vpopmail's internals. qmail i

qmail with vpopmail

I've got qmail and vpopmail working. and i can send out and recieve mails with the local machine. but whenever i try to send to the outside world. ms outlook give me this bounced email: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at vbrg-ns.iecommerce.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your mess

Re: Install DB library

Thus spake Allama Hicham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I'd like to Install DB library, but when I want to configure it, I have > a message like > "missing strip, No strip utility found" > Where can I found these "strip utility"? Who cares? qmail does not come with and does not need a "DB library" that

Re: dash addresses failing

ignore that reply...I'm still wiping sleep from my eyes... =G=

Re: dash addresses failing

Aaron Goldblatt wrote: > > Qmail 1.03, Linux 2.2.17, Slackware 7.1. Incoming mail to a given account > works okay. > > A test to [EMAIL PROTECTED] completes properly. > Compare this to... > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) This would seem to be true. Ther

Re: Fw: How set ONLY Mailbox work mode in qmail?

"Michail A.Baikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Better use link to /var/spool/mail and ONE software >(?standalone). ;-) Better than what? Why? >But might be qmail-pop3d make it mbox support in future? No, that won't happen. Maildir is superior and there are lots of mbox-compatible POP servers o

relaying

Hi, >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58.J >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 19:20:38 +0900 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Alan C

Re: Problems with relaying !

hi, try changing your rules to read: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Jon. Kornyakov Yevgeny wrote: > > Hi ! > I have problems whith relaying: > I use tcpserver and my file tcp.smtp > contain next lines > > 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIE

Problems with relaying !

Hi ! I have problems whith relaying: I use tcpserver and my file tcp.smtp contain next lines 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 192.168.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" and I started qmail: #!/bin/bash /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -c100 -x/etc/smtp.cdb -R -H -u 7770 -g 2108 0 smtp \

Re: relaying

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28 Sep 2000, at 19:20, Alan Chung wrote: > I am trying to setup some relaying for tcp.smtp server. > > Can I put domain name instead of IP address in /etc/tcp.smtp-rules? No, unless you do some serious patching. > And do I need to add an entry

relaying

Everyone, I am trying to setup some relaying for tcp.smtp server. Can I put domain name instead of IP address in /etc/tcp.smtp-rules? such as somedomain.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" According to documentation, it looks like only IP can be used. And do I need to add an entry in /var/qmail/control

qmail Digest 28 Sep 2000 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1137

qmail Digest 28 Sep 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1137 Topics (messages 49499 through 49606): Re: tcpserver 49499 by: Oliver Koch 49513 by: Charles Cazabon qmail logging 49500 by: reach_prashant.zeenext.com 49542 by: Dave Sill Re: Problem receiving 49501 by

Stack Smashing

Is (has) anyone looked into using something like immunix.org's compiler to protect qmail/vpopmail etc. from stack smashing attacks? Is anyone familiar with the exposure of these programs to this type of attack? Is it a non-issue due to the exceptional coding techniques / raw talent of qmail&vpo

solved : limiting max connection from same IP

hello friens thanks very much list specially to dave , anand ,Charles Cazabon , frank , at last i suceeded to limit max SMTP sessions from single ip thanks a lot once again Prashant Desai