Hi,
actually, this was a small bug in this early version of SPAMCONTROL.
Please upgrade to a new one.
You find the current releases at: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail
Thanks for using SPAMCONTROL.
cheers.
eh.
At 02:46 1.12.2000 +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:41:13PM
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Cyril Bitterich wrote:
Hi andi ?,
i want to make my machine k3.umm.ac.id be an mx for domain umm.ac.id
i put all of my machine name in rcpthost in /var/qmail/control/
all of my machine name like flamboyan.umm.ac.id , unix.umm.ac.id and
mail.umm.ac.id I put in to
hi andi,
tatsuya kansaki wrote:
i put all of my machine name in rcpthost in /var/qmail/control/
when someone send e-mail for example [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is going be normal..
but when hari@flamboyan send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..the message or
e-mail can't be send..
Hi LDAP fans
The new official qmail-ldap release 20001201 is out and available as
usual on
http://www.nrg4u.com
The following things have been added/changed relative to 2701:
- ~control/maxrcptcount to limit the maximum number of rcpt to's (new)
- ~control/relaymailfrom for
Just noticed the upgrade to ucspi-tcp-0.88, which is dated back in
March. The upgrade info makes it *look* safe for my installation. I
presume the fact that I haven't noticed people discussing it all year
is because it hasn't caused anybody any problems, rather than because
nobody has used it?
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 01:56:54PM -, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Just noticed the upgrade to ucspi-tcp-0.88, which is dated back in
March. The upgrade info makes it *look* safe for my installation. I
presume the fact that I haven't noticed people discussing it all year
is because it
Forgive me for opening this can of worms again, but I have something that
proves that the MAPS RSS *is* listing servers that it suspects are open
relays, even when they aren't.
My home ISP's outbound server was listed on Friday: texas.kingwoodcable.com,
or 208.223.8.79. According to the web
Peter Cavender wrote:
I'm taking a vacation from this list until the level of newbie
Even though some of the newbie questions make me cringe, the level of
rudeness and abuse others inject is totally unacceptable.
Having been a newbie and still class myself as one after some
years, I can
hello all, can anybody help me with my problem please ?
(on the begining, sorry for my very bad english...)
i have one machine 'ikarus.visimpex.cz' on my local network (without
dns), where qmail-pop3d and qmail-smtpd is running (all via tcpserver).
i tried to connect to account 'user' from
Am Sonntag, 26. November 2000 23:56 schrieb megadesign:
connecting to ikarus for new mails is ok,
but before new messages are received (or sended) there is too long
timeout. outl_express display message like "connected, but server has no
reaction after 60sec. wait or cancel ?". after click on
From: megadesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the end. ping between this machines is ok (10s). why there is so big
timeout ?
Try the -R and -H flags for tcpserver. You'll find more details in
http://binarios.com/miscnotes/ucspi-tcp.html#ucspi_tcp
Armando
Hi,
Is it possible to run qmail in a Reiser File System? If so, can you tell
me about how it is running?
Thanks,
Ari
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2000 02:51 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Is it possible to run qmail in a Reiser File System? If so, can you
tell me about how it is running?
What has qmail to do with the underlaying file system? This is hidden by the
OS of course.
Thanks,
Ari
--
Henning
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:51:02PM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run qmail in a Reiser File System? If so, can you tell
me about how it is running?
qmail will run on almost all Unix file systems, including
reiserfs. Note that a patch is necessary to qmail to
What has qmail to do with the underlaying file system? This
is hidden by the OS of course.
qmail relies heavily on proper operation of the underlying
filesystem to be truly reliable. Not much except BSD meets qmail's
definition of "proper." Ext2 and reiserfs are discussed thoroughly
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2000 03:11 schrieb Greg Owen:
What has qmail to do with the underlaying file system? This
is hidden by the OS of course.
qmail relies heavily on proper operation of the underlying
filesystem to be truly reliable. Not much except BSD meets qmail's
definition
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 11:56:32PM +0100, megadesign wrote:
hello all, can anybody help me with my problem please ?
(on the begining, sorry for my very bad english...)
No problem! You've explained your problem better than many native
English speakers on this list.
i have one machine
i try to make my problem be simple
1. i want to make my machine k3.umm.ac.id be domain for umm.ac.id
2. i put all of my machine name to /var/qmail/control/rcphost on
k3.umm.ac.id
like : mail.umm.ac.id ; unix.umm.ac.id ; k3.umm.ac.id
3. when i send e-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
Matt Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: If running a virus scanner would be free (i.e. does not reduce security,
: does not eat up CPU time on the email server, does not use memory, does
: not cost time and money to maintain) then I would not be
Hi,
I have smtp-auth patches applied (http://nimh.org/hacks/qmail-smtpd.c)
220 ..xxx.xx ESMTP
EHLO testx
250-..xxx.xx
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
xxx
334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
421 out of memory (#4.3.0)
535 auth failure
can you help
Kris Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forgive me for opening this can of worms again, but I have something
that proves that the MAPS RSS *is* listing servers that it suspects are
open relays, even when they aren't.
Have you reported this to RSS?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
is there any *real* documentation for ucspi-tcp? i'm sorry, but dan's is
really not very descriptive
- jeremy
23 matches
Mail list logo
