"Brian Longwe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harald
I'm not running an open relay. I am using tcpserver and allowing relaying
only for IP addresses that belong to my network (RELAYCLIENT). The problem
here is that it's one of my customers who has an application that is sending
out all this
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:54:04AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:26:21AM +, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
But I still prefer having smtp and qmtp separately (keeping the good
tradition of the multiple qmail conf files)
But what about precedence as Johan
Hi again!
I'm running qmail with big concurrency and big todo patch under Solaris
7 on a mirrored Disk.
It's horrible slow and sometimes there is a Message while sending Mail:
"451 qq trouble creating files in queue(#4.3.0)"
Possible Bottlenecks could be the semaphore Mechanism or the Solaris
qmail Digest 8 Jan 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1238
Topics (messages 54824 through 54862):
Newbie question
54824 by: Roger Arnold
54843 by: Jeff Lacy
Re: qmail-1.03-qmtpc-mailroutes.patch
54825 by: Johan Almqvist
54827 by: Johan Almqvist
Re: control/mailroutes
On 8 Jan 2001, Jenny Holmberg wrote:
"Brian Longwe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harald
I'm not running an open relay. I am using tcpserver and allowing relaying
only for IP addresses that belong to my network (RELAYCLIENT). The problem
here is that it's one of my customers who has an
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This won't work. The envelope sender for hahaha is empty. The address
you see in the From line is part of the data.
You are correct - my apologies. I claim lack of caffeine.
--
"I live in the heart of the machine. We are one."
OK Vince, what will work?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Jenny Holmberg
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: spam filter
On 8 Jan 2001, Jenny Holmberg wrote:
"Brian Longwe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phil Barnett writes:
Is it outlined somewhere how to block a single mail address to a
single mail address.
I have a user who is being harrassed and I need to intervene.
If someone is harrassing one of your users, then it would be reasonable to
presume that in doing so, they
Hi all
See, i have a big matter here.
One client have the qmail installed in his server, and the time is set
ok.
But all the messages come whit 1 hour later in time (timestamp i
belive)
Some one knows how to configure it
Did i use the qmail-inject command
Someone have this
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Brian Longwe wrote:
OK Vince, what will work?
I've been letting them come in then contacting the user and pointing
them to the fix. I've heard that qmail-scanner will detect this tho.
There's a link to it on www.qmail.org.
Vince.
Brian
-Original Message-
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:26:21AM +, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:00:49AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:40:39AM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
Hi!
There patch I released earlier wasn't quite as careful about memory
allocation
If people prefer two files, then this is what I find best...
I still prefer a single file, called smtproutes, though.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:36:25AM +, James Raftery wrote:
My preference is for seperate files to specify artificial routes for
smtp and qmtp, and for the instructions in
Hello all,
I am new to this list and qmail itself. I am using Bruce Guetner's qmail
RPMs on a RH6.2+updates system. I support IMAP via Courier-IMAP and POP3
via qmail-pop3d. Most of my clients are Internet cafes. I am planning to
give them unlimited number of e-mail addresses subject to
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:21:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If people prefer two files, then this is what I find best...
I still prefer a single file, called smtproutes, though.
My preference is for seperate files to specify artificial routes for
smtp and qmtp, and for the
Hi
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
backward compatibility is a must, so smtproutes must be read.
Best regards.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:42:07PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:40:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
backward compatibility is a must, so smtproutes must be read.
That I can
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:40:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
backward
+ "Alessander Salgueirosa" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Hi all
|
| See, i have a big matter here.
| One client have the qmail installed in his server, and the time is set ok.
| But all the messages come whit 1 hour later in time (timestamp i belive)
| Some one knows how to configure it
Hmm. I
there is a list archive for BIND/DNS at:
http://www.isc.org/ml-archives/bind-users/
ALso on there you can join the list, which is a crossover to the newsgroup:
comp.protocols.dns.bind (i think that is what it's called).
As for the MX record. The MX record is what tells the world to send mail
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:15:25AM +, Andrew Alford wrote:
Is it necessary, even if you can ping on the internet your "mail.xyz.com
or smtp.xyz.com", to have your mx server listed with your registrar?
That depends. If your mail addresses are of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED], you will
need
OK, I'm looking at the qmail-scanner option and installing all the
prerequisite applications. From what I see in the documentation, it looks
like there might be significant increase in my memory/cpu overhead. I'm a
bit worried about this does anyone have experience with qmail-scanner in a
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:14:58AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
Hi again!
I'm running qmail with big concurrency and big todo patch under Solaris
7 on a mirrored Disk.
It's horrible slow and sometimes there is a Message while sending Mail:
"451 qq trouble creating files in queue(#4.3.0)"
Mark Delany wrote:
Sigh. What do you mean by slow? 1000 deliveries a second? One delivery
a day? You haven't defined what you mean by slow and haven't shown how
what happens is different.
How about some log files showing what you think are slow deliveries?
Remember, we know nothing about
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2001 11:15 schrieb one:
Hi :
How I config qmail and ldap ?
Why I cannot patch qmail-ldap and How ? Is error.
Where I can find more info about qmail-ldap ?
Can you help me ?
We have our own mailing list for qmail-ldap, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Documentation lives on
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:39:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
backward compatibility is a must, so smtproutes must be read.
Why?
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2001 13:33 schrieb M. Yu:
Hello all,
I am new to this list and qmail itself. I am using Bruce Guetner's qmail
RPMs on a RH6.2+updates system. I support IMAP via Courier-IMAP and POP3
via qmail-pop3d. Most of my clients are Internet cafes. I am planning to
give them
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:59:49AM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:39:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if smtproutes don't exist and there is a mailroutes use that instead.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:08:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:59:49AM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:39:42PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
My favourit still is: single file called smtproutes. Maybe add an option
that if
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:33:58PM +0800, M. Yu wrote:
Hello all,
I am new to this list and qmail itself. I am using Bruce Guetner's qmail
RPMs on a RH6.2+updates system. I support IMAP via Courier-IMAP and POP3
via qmail-pop3d. Most of my clients are Internet cafes. I am planning to
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:33:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:16:22AM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
I don't see what the problem is. If you really want smtproutes handled
like it is now, make a symlink from mailroutes to smtproutes.
A symlink get's the job
Hi...
is there a possibility with qmail to do a pop-before-smtp for authenticating
a user
to qmail so that all users can send mail to my qmail ?
Regards,
Alexander Meis
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:36:36AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
Why? When upgrading from 1.03 to 1.04 the instructions will tell you
to rename the file.
Is Dan putting out a 1.04? I thought he was working on qmail2. Did
I miss something?
I
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:45:32PM +0100, Alexander Meis (simmail] wrote:
Hi...
is there a possibility with qmail to do a pop-before-smtp for authenticating
a user
to qmail so that all users can send mail to my qmail ?
Of course. Go to www.qmail.org, search auth. You'll find something.
take a look at vchkpw from www.inter7.com
they keep a rules list based on the tcpserver rules list that gets an ip added
to it when a user pops their mail off, then removes it after a configurable
amount of time.
MHP
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Alexander Meis (simmail] wrote:
Hi...
is there a
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:48:26AM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
Or imagine:
- I have a stock qmail server with smtproutes,
- I decide that I want to use QMTP,
- I setup an appropriate mailroutes file,
- It doesn't work, because I forgot to patch qmail.
That's not a problem with the patch
Hi...
i hope this is the support list for smtp-poplock v2.0
How does the pop line in the inetd.conf should look like when i want
to ust the poplick with qpopper?
This is the original.
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root /usr/local/lib/popper qpopper -s
Thanks for helping
Alex
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:27:45PM +0300, Brian Longwe wrote:
OK, I'm looking at the qmail-scanner option and installing all the
prerequisite applications. From what I see in the documentation, it looks
like there might be significant increase in my memory/cpu overhead. I'm a
bit worried
Please,
I'm using a e-mail server running qmail-1.03. How can I implement relay
control.
The problem is that I need to allow any mail for or from my domain and
relay from some IP addresses only.
Thanks
Vidal Melo
[smtproutes vs mailroutes]
my point of view:
if smtrproutes exists, they should be read and used. so far nothing changes
against stock qmail.
if mailrotes exists, the user has abviously read the INSTALL or README.
There's a good place to mention that mailroutes have precedence over
check out cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, you
wrote: Please,
I'm using a e-mail server running qmail-1.03. How can I implement relay
control.
The problem is that I need to allow any mail for or from my domain and
relay from some IP addresses only.
Thanks
Vidal Melo
--
This isn't *strictly* a qmail problem, but we are running qmail and seeing
some weird behavior.
I just upgraded our firewall to Redhat 7.0 w/ 2.2.16-22 kernel running
ipchains. We *were* at 2.0.38 w/ ipfwadm. Ever since, Outlook Express
(5.50.4522.1200) hangs in sending e-mail, but only in odd
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Henning Brauer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2001 19:00 schrieb Alexander Meis (simmail]:
Hi...
i hope this is the support list
There are no support lists, there are just mailing lists with users.
for smtp-poplock v2.0
How does the pop line in the inetd.conf
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:21:28PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
[smtproutes vs mailroutes]
if smtrproutes exists, they should be read and used. so far nothing changes
against stock qmail.
if mailrotes exists, the user has abviously read the INSTALL or README.
There's a good place to
Fine by me... as long as installing thew patch does not affect current config :)
Best regards :)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:24:14PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:21:28PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
[smtproutes vs mailroutes]
if smtrproutes exists, they should be
Hi!
is there any patch, which add some text at the bottom of each sending
message?
__
WS
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:00:24PM +0100, BOFH wrote:
is there any patch, which add some text at the bottom of each sending
message?
It can be done using the QMAILQUEUE patch by Bruce G - but it's dangerous
as it may break MIME. Or complicated, as you'll have to parse the MIME
message, add the
Hi All,
I was wondering, would it be possible to add the following to
my init script for qmail so that I can process tcprules changes on
a easier basis:
tcprules)
cp /etc/tcp.smtp /etc/tcp.smtp.bak
echo -n "tcprules file backed up..."
tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
Matt Harrington wrote:
Great! that does it. Any idea how to include a newline in the error
though?
along the lines of...
| bouncesaying '\nMy new address is:\n\[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
---Matt
how about
| bouncesaying [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo My new address is
More than that, opening up
Johan Almqvist wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:00:24PM +0100, BOFH wrote:
is there any patch, which add some text at the bottom of each sending
message?
It can be done using the QMAILQUEUE patch by Bruce G - but it's dangerous
as it may break MIME. Or complicated, as you'll have to
no,
i dont mean the badmailfrom file, i use that successfully already.
i want to block all mails with a particular pattern inside them. i see there
is a "badmailpattern" control file on the qmail webpage but no one can
verify if it works or not. (it doesnt work for me, ive already tried. i was
I am getting the following all of a sudden. My control files all have that
domain in them.
Here is what I'm getting. This is a normal user account.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
x.x.x.x does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address
rejected: Relay access denied
You probably need to setup your machine to relay properly, it sounds like
you are using the rcpthosts as a substitute for this. If i'm wrong, did
you kill -HUP the qmail-send process after you added this to rcpthosts?
If im right, see:
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#relaying
On Mon, 8
On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:50:29 EST, wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
x.x.x.x does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address
rejected: Relay access denied
Giving up on x.x.x.x.
Hmm, this is not a qmail error message. In fact, if I do the following
it looks
I've set up a qmail server on an RH 6.2 box. I have a startup script for
qmail, what I'm looking for now is the most effective manner for starting up
qmail-pop3d and qmail-smtpd using tcpserver.
I've gone through tons and tons of docs, but what I'm curious about is-
Is it most effective to
Attached is the qmail script I use for qmail on my rh system. You'll have
to edit the line in the pop3 startup for your server. This one runs qmail's
maildir format, uses accustamp and cyclog for its logging, and smtp has
included the things for smtp-after-pop relaying. So depending on your
I have a program that is available under the GPL at
http://www.groovy.org/open.shtml
called BlackHole. It can be used in a .qmail file, and uses the major
RBL/ORBS type sites plus has recipient good/bad lists using regular
expressions. It is in Perl and can log and keep the email it blocks,
hi
I am having problems using tcpserver, I am trying to run sshd under it.
There doesnt seem to a list related to ucspi-tcp stuff so I am asking here.
Please reply off list. Is there a mailing list I can join about tcpserver?
anyone run sshd from tcpserver?
My problem is that sshd is setup and
Hi All
I want to setup qmail for ldap. I
patch src of qmail by command
# patch -p1
qmail-ldap-1.03-20001201.patch
But this command is alert error
:
Hunk #1 failed at line 0.Hunk #2
failed at line 431.Hunk #3 failed at line 1.Hunk #4 failed at line
20.Hunk #5 failed at line 136.Hunk #6
58 matches
Mail list logo
