Hi again, Sorry for e-mailing this one more time, but I feel like this got
lost between the other more interesting topics. I hope there is somebody
who could take a look at this and help me out. I can not imagine that this
is such a unusual case. I am trying settings here and there, changing t
In a perfect world, QMTP would require that a qmtpd accept
VERP-formatted envelope senders. And qmail would collate remote
deliveries by hostname, and dump all copies of a piece of email to all
the recipients at once. I have customers for whom that would be an
incredibly good win.
Of course, i
Rohit Gupta writes:
> Any any out to actually fix up a disk quota for allthe virtual usrers...
> pls help
Yes. You can use this code:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Paul Gregg has a
script
which runs from a .qmail file that checks a Maildir for a quota
(clearly only effective on a userless mailhub)
Ah, yes. Hotmail is owned by Mirco$oft. The last I heard microsoft tried
porting Hotmail to Windows NT and it kept crashing and crashing... That
was before Windows 2k.
So it would make logical sense but is it technically feasible to do so..
Regards
George Patterson
Boz Crowther wrote:
> Is
"A number of large Internet sites are using qmail: Hotmail's outgoing mail
(although Microsoft thinks they're going to transition to W2K), ..." --
www.qmail.org/top.html
If they ever tried switching to w2k, many thousands of hotmail's users
wouldn't be able to send email until Microsoft restored
Igor Loncarevic wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any other solution to speed up process of scanning on qmail 1.03
> + AmaVis + Sophos, and to lower load avg on machine (it can get high as
> 12).. besices nice-ing sweep from Sophos?
Please consider to use AMaViS-Perl instead.
best regards,
Rainer
Isn't Hotmail owned by M$ (has been for a while, actually)? So, it would
make sense that they run M$ OSes.
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Laudat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Hotmail Woes.
>
Is there an existing way to use logcheck (1.11)
with qmail, or do I need to hack at the logcheck script to get it to work
correctly?
Thanks.
I see you have Linux 2.4.0-test11.
Did you BY (BIG) MISTAKE compile TCP congestion notification in it?
Hotmail is quite mad about this. Maybe their routers run M$ windows.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:36:53PM -0500, Corey Jarvis wrote:
> To whomever,
> I am having a wierd problem with hotmail.com
Quoting vasudeva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> my host name is: vasu.domain.com
> my main branch host name is: email.domain.com
> domain name is: domain.com
Last I checked (as in a few seconds ago) domain.com is registered to
a US company, in Pennsylvania, that happens to be a domain registrar.
You're i
Corey,
Is the IP brand new? If the IP has ever been used by a spammer, it could
be on a lit somewhere. I would advise looking it up at www.mail-abuse.org
and www.orbs.org just in case.
Also, what happens if you manually connect to the hotmail server to send a
message (using telnet)?
Jamin
On F
To whomever,
I am having a wierd problem with hotmail.com smtp connections,
Anyone in the world can send to me however when I send to hotmail.com it
won't accept any smtp connection.
I can send to yahoo or whomever accept to hotmail and certain other
domains. I know I am not black listed since th
Quoting Martin Langhoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It's not clear to me if (66.60.1.118) is the originator of the msg or
> the originator of the bounce. Could anyone be so kind as to give me some
> hints on how should I read this?
I'm getting so many double-bounces from this blasted worm, I co
hi,
I would like to ask more experienced mail admins around here to help me
check this bounce msg. My main concern is that I am not sure whether it
is my customer (signoplast.com.ar) who's infected.
It's not clear to me if (66.60.1.118) is the originator of the msg or
the origin
"Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Understand, but I can't seem to get past the OS wanting the first
> component to be a directory.
Right, it does - or rather, *every* component, except the last.
> I guess if people had a .qmail directory...
As I do.
> But is there a way without the r
> > That's the assumption, but which Unixen legitimately traverses based
> > on a name like .qmail-../../../etc/passwd?
>
> The dash field need not be "-". In particular, it can end in "/", so
> that ".." in ext would work, if left unaltered.
Understand, but I can't seem to get past the OS want
"Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:31:56PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> > "David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >that man page [dot-qmail] says:
> > >> WARNING: For security, qmail-local replaces any dots in ext with colons
> > >> before checking .qmail-e
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:31:56PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> "David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >that man page [dot-qmail] says:
> >
> >> WARNING: For security, qmail-local replaces any dots in ext with colons
> >> before checking .qmail-ext. For convenience, qmail-local conver
"David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>that man page [dot-qmail] says:
>
>> WARNING: For security, qmail-local replaces any dots in ext with colons
>> before checking .qmail-ext. For convenience, qmail-local converts any
>> uppercase letters in ext to lowercase.
>
>
>What exactly is
Thus spake Henning Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
> > qmail source. You can find a link to it on www.qmail.org.
> This is a smtp after pop solution, no SMTP AUTH. SMTP AUTH is an SMTP
> protocol extension allowing clients to a
Hello all,
Per Mark's suggestion I have put my maillogs up for perusal at this URL:
http://listserv.investorlinks.com/qmail/
I am using Qmail 1.03 on RedHat Linux 6.2. I have applied big-concurrency,
big-todo, fastforward and dotforward.
I also am use the tcpserver from uscpi tools. I have soft l
I do have some relevant log files, however they are quite large. I am
running RedHat Linux
6.2. Previously I was using OpenBSD 2.7. Thanks for the tip on qmail-qmqpc,
I'll look into this.
-Collin
-Original Message-
From: Mark Delany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:44:33AM -0500, Collin B. McClendon wrote:
> Hello,
> I was wondering if anyone else has had this issue. I am running listserv
> lists with about 10k in one list and 20k in the other.
> It seems that since i switched to Linux as the operating system instead of
> BSD, the
Make sure your dates are synched between your NFS server and your mail
server.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:52 AM
Subject: qmail-pop3d weired problem with NFS
>
>
>hello friends
>
>i have installed the qm
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone else has had this issue. I am running listserv
lists with about 10k in one list and 20k in the other.
It seems that since i switched to Linux as the operating system instead of
BSD, the que gets stuck on one domain and takes forever.
The only way to get mail out i
Raymund Cortez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've encountered an error during install of make setup check
> it says:
> /bin/sh: ./auto-uid: 0403-006 Execute permission denied.
> make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
Are you doing your build on a filesystem mounted with no-ex
hello friends
i have installed the qmail-1.03 with ldap patch 2000601 , every thing
is working fine except the pop3 the problems is very weired as well as
intresting , thing is that when i am defining users homedirectory on nfs
mounted file system qmail is delivering mail to users Maild
Are vpopmail owned by the group "vchkpw"?
-Original Message-
From: Jesús Arnáiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11. januar 2001 10:00
To: qmail
Subject: #4.3.0 error
Hi everyone!
I use qmail-1.03, vpopmail and qmailadmin. When I create a new virtual
domain and I try to send some
mes
> I have configured qmail server and trying to
> connect to my main branch to get mails , but this is
> happening without any problem. Only thing after
> getting mails to the qmail server I am getting error
> message while delivering to each user:
>
> deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:50:28PM -0800, Rohit Gupta wrote:
> Any any out to actually fix up a disk quota for allthe virtual usrers...
> pls help
Looking to your recent mails I'm getting the impression qmail-ldap is the
solution for you.
http://www.nrgu4.com -> the patch itself
http://www.lifewi
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:07:32AM -0800, vasudeva wrote:
> I have configured qmail server and trying to
> connect to my main branch to get mails , but this is
> happening without any problem. Only thing after
> getting mails to the qmail server I am getting error
> message while delivering to
Hi all,
I have configured qmail server and trying to
connect to my main branch to get mails , but this is
happening without any problem. Only thing after
getting mails to the qmail server I am getting error
message while delivering to each user:
deferral: CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote:
>
> > You're not going to find any ESMTP AUTH solutions for qmail that don't
> > involve patching qmail's source.
>
> This is completely false. smtp-poplock doesn't require patching the
>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:44:09AM +1300, Bjorn Nilsen wrote:
> smtp-poplock is just another implementation of "pop before smtp" which I
> already have with vpopmail. I will explain in more detail why this solution
> doesn't work for me. Many mail clients the default or only action is to send
> ma
qmail Digest 12 Jan 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1242
Topics (messages 55028 through 55078):
Re: tcpserver: fatal:, cat, svc commands not found
55028 by: Manvendra Bhangui
55029 by: pape.innominate.com
Re: qmail-smtpd-auth
55030 by: Vince Vielhaber
55055 by: Bjorn
btw, there's already a patch going around that does this, you can use that
one and configure the controlfile to accept only 20 rcptto's. It would
violate the RFC I guess...
F.
-Original Message-
From: Markus Stumpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 12 januari 2001 2:47
To: [EMAIL
Any any out to actually fix up a disk quota for
allthe virtual usrers...
pls help
37 matches
Mail list logo
