Re: High Volume....

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:37:03AM +0200, Xavier Pegenaute wrote: Hi all.. i can try any prime number for hashing ..? ( is limited?) You can try any number, but anything over 1/1000th of your queuesize is overkill. The default of 23 is therefore suitable for about 23.000 messages. and, is

Re: High Volume....

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote: http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000 If you have nothing to say, don't say it. And if you insist on saying it, at least learn how to quote correctly. Greetz, Peter -- Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html

Re: child crashed

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:44:23PM -0700, newbieportal wrote: Hi everyone for some reason I'm getting this error on my qmail-send log file @40003b40ca153456a8a4 delivery 1594225: deferral: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/ Showing us all lines pertaining to 'delivery 1594225' and then

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: Jörgen Persson wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:25:20AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: i've heard from a couple people that the qmail-send process is supposed to take up all the avail cpu when nothing else is using it; is

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Will Yardley
yeah but there is barely anything there. we don't send out very much mail at all (the machine is only for internal use). in fact the entire /var/qmail/queue directory tree is pretty much empty, as is /var/spool/qmail this is why it's perplexing... i think it must be a problem with the install

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:36:51AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: zugzug# ll total 16 drwxr-x---2 qmailq qmail4096 Mar 30 2000 ./ drwxr-x--- 11 qmailq qmail4096 Mar 30 2000 ../ -rw---1 qmails qmail 0 Mar 30 2000 sendmutex -rw-r--r--1 qmailr

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Will Yardley
sweet thanks for pointing this out. sorry to be so obtuse, but can you explain how it should be? make check didn't fix it (although it did notice that there was a problem). i also tried: make trigger zugzug# make trigger cc trigger.o -o trigger /usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote: [snip] Any ideas? Could this be DNS problems? Shouldn't be, as everything else in that regard seems to be working in the server. It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably unable to resolve the reverse

Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Petter Sundlöf
Hi. I just moved my QMail-based box (QMail for SMTP, UW-imapd for IMAP) to a new place, with a new IP and connection and all. Strangely though, at first it wouldn't work at all... couldn't log in to IMAP. I had set up all the network stuff correctly -- it at least worked. After a reboot or two

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Petter Sundlöf
It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs. Greetz, Peter But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not, that's just insane. How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do have

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:02:31AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: sweet thanks for pointing this out. sorry to be so obtuse, but can you explain how it should be? The server I'm currently on looks like this: total 12 drwxr-x---2 qmailq qmail4096 Jul 1 2000 . drwxr-x--- 11

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote: It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs. Greetz, Peter But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not, that's just

Aliases with -

2001-07-03 Thread Peter Klingeberg
Hi ! Is there any special capital like : for dots to use - in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name) Thanks

conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread D Rajesh
Hi All, Sorry, to bother all eventhough the subject says SUCCESS. Just to Thank all I have gone through the qmail - mailing archives and finally succeeded in applying big-concurrency patch. The archives were simply great with all the help. I have found the solution for the FD_SET error

Re: Aliases with -

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote: Hi ! Is there any special capital like : for dots to use - in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name) No, - works just fine. Only dot is special. Greetz, Peter -- Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: [snip] My qmail parameters are as follows on a redhat Linux 6.2 kernel 2.2.14 :- Upgrade to the most recent. Now. qmail + DNS patch + big - todo patch + big - concurrency patch silent concurrency --- 1000 conf-split --- 15

Re: Aliases with -

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:50:36AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote: Is there any special capital like : for dots to use - in aliasnames ? (.qmail-user-name-name) Use ''-'' for aliases with ''-'', ie: if .qmail-user-name-name is located under ~alias it recieves mail for

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Will Yardley
i installed the .deb binary packages (very nervously) and i think that has fixed the problem *knocks wood* thanks to everyone who responded. one other little question. is there anywhere else i should check permissions of besides /var/qmail/ ? i had to change the uids and gids of some system

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: conf-split --- 15 Congratulations. Nobody knew that 15 was a prime until today. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a

dot-qmail problem

2001-07-03 Thread usenet_only
Hello, I am using the .qmail-file to forward messages to another email-address. But I want to keep the mails in original Maildir also. My .qmail-file: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./Maildir/ Postmaster receives following error: Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mydomain.com I'm afraid I wasn't able

Re: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:22:43AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: i installed the .deb binary packages (very nervously) and i think that has fixed the problem *knocks wood* thanks to everyone who responded. one other little question. is there anywhere else i should check permissions of

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread D Rajesh
Hi Henning / Peter, Thanks a lot for your responses.. I'm really very sorry..about the typo mistake conf-split is 17 conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with the default 23? I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:27:21PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: [snip] conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with the default 23? I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000 messages *in the queue* . I guess this does not happen even if I

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread D Rajesh
Hi Peter, Thanks again for your reply I am actually trying to send 200,000 mails and not 1 mail to 200,000 people... !!! PL suggest me on what parameters should I use ... Cheers, rajesh. - Original Message - From: Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:55:59PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote: Hi Peter, Thanks again for your reply I am actually trying to send 200,000 mails and not 1 mail to 200,000 people... !!! PL suggest me on what parameters should I use ... Then set your conf-split to somewhere near 200. A nice

Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS

2001-07-03 Thread D Rajesh
Hi Peter, Thanks again for your patience. I will do that. I will send the mails after the config and Hope that atleast my Linux Kernel will not crash ;) I will let you and the list know on the performance I get. Thanks a lot to all... Finally with all your help I am ready for it and waiting

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread adi
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:46:12AM +0200, J?rgen Persson wrote: But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not, that's just insane. How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do have 192.168.1.15 in /etc/hosts, with a name... Are you using tcpserver??

looking for files

2001-07-03 Thread GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI
Hi all. In lifewithqmail, the script for start/stop qmail-pop3d use files: /usr/local/bin/softlimit , /usr/local/bin/multilog Wher can I find those files? I have qmail-1.03, checkpassword-0.90 ucspi-tcp-0.88 but I haven't got softlimit and multilog. thanks --yapedu

(No subject)

2001-07-03 Thread reach_prashant
Hello friends i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is getting an error connection timeout/reset etc errors while

Re: looking for files

2001-07-03 Thread Jason Kawaja
ftp cr.yp.to/daemontools On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote: use files: /usr/local/bin/softlimit , /usr/local/bin/multilog Wher can I find those files? I have qmail-1.03, checkpassword-0.90 /* Regards, Jason Kawaja, UF-ECE Sys Admin */

Re: High Volume....

2001-07-03 Thread Jost Krieger
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:11:33AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:37:03AM +0200, Xavier Pegenaute wrote: Hi all.. i can try any prime number for hashing ..? ( is limited?) You can try any number, but anything over 1/1000th of your queuesize is overkill. I

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Jörgen Persson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:59:00PM +0700, adi wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:46:12AM +0200, Jörgen Persson wrote: How do I go around qmail trying to resolve 192.168's? I do have 192.168.1.15 in /etc/hosts, with a name... Are you using tcpserver?? Does it ask for reverse lookups?

Re: High Volume....

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:45:09PM +, Jost Krieger wrote: [snip] I thought it would be better to take a number about the square root of the top queue size, which minimizes search length on a classical file system. For 23000 your on the order of 151, which happens to look prime. Search

RFC complience

2001-07-03 Thread reach_prashant
Hello friends i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is getting an error connection timeout/reset etc errors

getting more verbose error messages from qmail

2001-07-03 Thread Michael Geier, CDM Systems Admin
preface: qmail 1.03 with big-concurrency multilog need: link to information (or information) on producing more verbose, or detailed information in qmail logs for error messages like #4.4.1 or #5.1.1 would like to see the email address the error is talking

Re: RFC complience

2001-07-03 Thread Vincent Schonau
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:47:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] i myself has tested this tool(mail client for tv for broadband network) with other ISP's , other mail servers on internet but its working with all those accept out mail server , so please suggest how to

Re: RFC complience

2001-07-03 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:47:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello friends i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my

Re: Extremely slow after move/IP change

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Petter Sundlöf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's DNS problems. The resolver listed in /etc/resolv.conf is probably unable to resolve the reverse for your 192.168. IPs. But shouldn't I be able to use it within the local network? If not, that's just insane. Sure, it works fine within the local

Re: (No subject)

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days i have received a complain from one of my customer that he is not able to send (relay or mail destined to localdomain) from my qmail-smtpd , he is getting an error connection

Re: dot-qmail problem

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) What is wrong? You're using vpopmail, which seems to have its own interpretation of .qmail files. Switch to vmailmgr (where you can override the default behaviour using

Autoresponder problem.

2001-07-03 Thread Zak Thompson
Guys/Gals, I'm having a small problem with qmail. When ever someone uses a form to submit an email to a email address it works fine. but if they submit it to a auto-responder it doesn't work. It doesn't put the correct field in the FROM address so the responder doesn't know who to

Re: Autoresponder problem.

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Zak Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When ever someone uses a form to submit an email to a email address it works fine. but if they submit it to a auto-responder it doesn't work. It doesn't put the correct field in the FROM address so the responder doesn't know who to respond to.

Home directory is sticky ??

2001-07-03 Thread Arno Slatius
Hello, I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong: Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal: Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file. This is quite strange

Re: Home directory is sticky ??

2001-07-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote: [snip] Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal: Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file. I think it spells 'deferral'. Next time, be sure to copy verbatim. Sometimes these small

Re: Home directory is sticky ??

2001-07-03 Thread Chris Johnson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote: I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong: Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:

Re: Autoresponder problem.

2001-07-03 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:39:15AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: How on earth is FrontPage relevant? Why is a pseudo-HTML-editor trying to send mail? And unless I'm mistaken, FrontPage doesn't run on Unix, so it can hardly be calling qmail-inject. I totally second your frontpage opinion,

Re: Home directory is sticky ??

2001-07-03 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Arno Slatius wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get an email server up using qmail (using ./Maildir/) and it seems to work quite well so far but now what is going wrong: Whenever I send an email to an unknown user the log states: defferal:

majordomo

2001-07-03 Thread balaji adhimoolam
hi all, i have a problem with majordomo..i have succesfuly installed majordomo and iam able to send mails to it frm qmail..the problem is that when i create lists..i have to have corresponding .qmail files in the aliases..here for list test .qmail-test i have

Re: dot-qmail problem

2001-07-03 Thread Lou Hevly
At 12:00 03/07/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am using the .qmail-file to forward messages to another email-address. But I want to keep the mails in original Maildir also. Which original Maildir? You have to specify a username. My .qmail-file: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./Maildir/ Assuming

LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread Constantine Koulis
Hi all. i am instaling for the 20th time the LINUX 7.0 +qmail+courier-imap+vmailmgr but dont want to make mistakes again so i followed the maildirmake HOWTO that is in the /doc/ directory but i have a question. In the LWQ is says the following : Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir

Re: majordomo

2001-07-03 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
switch to ezmlm ;-) installation on qmail systems is quite straightforward http://www.ezmlm.org/ /k balaji adhimoolam([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.03 08:10:21 +: hi all, i have a problem with majordomo..i have succesfuly installed majordomo and iam able to send mails to it frm

Re: RFC complience

2001-07-03 Thread Lukas Beeler
i think it's the mail tool on the tv box which breaks the RFC's and not qmail get a computer and everything is fine At 12:47 03.07.2001 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello friends i have been using qmail-1.03 from almost a year now , and before 2 days i have received a complain from

Re: LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Constantine Koulis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the LWQ is says the following : Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't create them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that comes with qmail. E.g., maildirmake ~/Maildir. Be

Re: LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread John Groseclose
At 6:24 PM +0300 7/3/01, Constantine Koulis wrote: THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE and what is SKELETON? Not at all. It means you have to create a Maildir in /etc/skel, which is the reference directory for useradd to create new user directories. Then, every

Re: LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread Vincent Schonau
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 06:24:42PM +0300, Constantine Koulis wrote: [...] Note: qmail-local can deliver mail to maildir mailboxes, but it can't create them. Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that comes with qmail. E.g., maildirmake ~/Maildir. Be sure to run

Re: LWQ question..cjk

2001-07-03 Thread Ruprecht Helms
Hi Constantine, ... Maildir mailboxes should be created with the maildirmake program that comes with qmail. E.g., maildirmake ~/Maildir. ... THAT MEANS THAT FOR EVERY VIRTUAL USER I HAVE TO DO MAILDIRMAKE and what is SKELETON? no why. I have installed qmail with real life users using

RE: Autoresponder problem.

2001-07-03 Thread Brad Dameron
Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do it now. Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers. Also there seems to be a lot of autoresponders out there. I took one of the original ones and revised it with a few fixes and some additions. I have attached

qmail install

2001-07-03 Thread Jared Hoskinson
I have installed qmail from source on a RH 7 box. I followed lwq which was very helpful. Here is my problem, qmail starts ok add allows connections on port 25 and accepts mail, however the mail just sits in the queue and is never delivered, the defaultdelivery is ./Maildir/ and I have the .qmail

Re: majordomo

2001-07-03 Thread John Hogan
switch to ezmlm ;-) ditto... installation on qmail systems is quite straightforward http://www.ezmlm.org/ the mysql support is awesome - very powerful :-) - hogan /k balaji adhimoolam([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.03 08:10:21 +: hi all, i have a problem with majordomo.. snip

Re: qmail install

2001-07-03 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:34:18PM -0500, Jared Hoskinson wrote: /service/qmail-send: up (pid 27094) 0 seconds That's the problem, qmail-send isn't even running. qmial-start ./Maildir/ alert: cannot start: unable to open mutex Go back to your source dir and type make setup check again,

a wee rant (was: 'RE: Autoresponder problem.')

2001-07-03 Thread John Hogan
Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do it now. Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers. not to be rude, but don't even go there... for our customers who want frontpage as their primary web-authoring interface (especially in an enterprise

Re: a wee rant

2001-07-03 Thread Robin S. Socha
* John Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010703 13:51]: also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache environments - all such security issues can be resolved in an m$ iis environment (with application of the current corrections, patches, fixes and updates Ahhh... you're

Re: a wee rant (was: 'RE: Autoresponder problem.')

2001-07-03 Thread Henning Brauer
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0500, John Hogan wrote: Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do it now. Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers. also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache environments - all such

Re: qmail install

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Jared Hoskinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have installed qmail from source on a RH 7 box. I followed lwq which was very helpful. Unfortunately, you appear to not have followed it very well. Here is my problem, qmail starts ok add allows connections on port 25 and accepts mail, however

qfilter to add disclaimer (examples?)

2001-07-03 Thread Jeff Newton
The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add an email disclaimer. Does anyone have sample scripts they are willing to share with me? Cheers, -- Jeff Newton

Re: qfilter to add disclaimer (examples?)

2001-07-03 Thread peter green
* Jeff Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010703 15:46]: The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add an email disclaimer. I don't think so. The archive indicates many people ask the list how to add an email disclaimer to outgoing mail. They are generally, as is proper, shunned or

Re: qfilter to add disclaimer (examples?)

2001-07-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Jeff Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The list archive indicates many people are using qfilter to add an email disclaimer. As Peter noted, this is not necessarily the case -- instead, people are always asking how to accomplish various things like this, such as adding standard headers or

Re: qfilter to add disclaimer (examples?)

2001-07-03 Thread MarkD
Note that in this day of MIME and multipart messages, attachments, digitally signed email, encrypted email, and everything else, it is generally a very bad idea to try to append an arbitrary block of text to any message -- even an innocuous footer. For this reason, we ask that you consider

TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA
ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA TÉLÉPHONE: 873 762 357 297 (TÉLÉPHONE DE SATELITE) EFAX: 775 796 0118 CHER MONSIEUR, Je dois d'abord de tout implorer votre indulgence que cette proposition est sérieusement considérée comme pressante et strictement confidentiel. Je suis M. Abdulkareem Kasereka,

Re: TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread Robin S. Socha
* ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010703 16:24]: CHER MONSIEUR, Eh. Sexual harrassment. USD 6m waiting for me. C007!!!1 Anyway, darling, your request for steamed frog avec Cous-Cous has been taken. You'll be served a couple of PDF files shortly. You don't mind them coming in 1k

Re: TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread Stephen Bosch
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Robin S. Socha wrote: * ABDULKAREEM KASEREKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010703 16:24]: CHER MONSIEUR, Eh. Sexual harrassment. USD 6m waiting for me. C007!!!1 Anyway, darling, your request for steamed frog avec Cous-Cous has been taken. You'll be served a couple of PDF

Re: TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread Jamyn
The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for 'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*) There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the web as well. Only the names, places, and dollar amounts are different in that

Re: TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread MarkD
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 05:28:49PM -0500, Jamyn allegedly wrote: The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for 'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*) There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the web as

Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD

2001-07-03 Thread Felix von Leitner
Thus spake Henning Brauer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): What's is the best OS for run Qmail (and/or Ezmlm)? What advantage and disadvantage has each one? I'll need send two millions mails per day and I don't know what hard can I buy? :) Kindly ignoring that this is dicussed a thousand times in the

Re: TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

2001-07-03 Thread Stephen Bosch
Jamyn wrote: The email is basically a scam I've seen before, translated to French (for 'confidentiality reasons' they say.. *cough*Avoiding US Feds*cough*) There is another similar email written in english, circulating around the web as well. Only the names, places, and dollar amounts

HELP: 4.4.2 error

2001-07-03 Thread Eduardo Gargiulo
Hi all. I'm running qmail and ezmlm-idx. Yesterday, the log start to say deferral: Connected_to_200.0.218.99_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ for each address with doamin siderar.com. The problem is that 74% of the subscribers have this kind of addresses. How can I solve this problem ??? thanks

mail sorting

2001-07-03 Thread Kman
I remember that I once read something about sorting bulk mail (different mesg in each mail) by domain before sending them out is a bad idea. Can't find it in the archive. Anyone can tell me why? Are we going to saturate the qmail-remote (concurrencyremote) when the a particular remote is busy

Re: Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD

2001-07-03 Thread mgeier
Thank god we have you around Fenix to drag up a troll's thread that hasn't been discussed in two days and is completely OT. Whatever would this list do without you to jab at the ignorant to make yourself feel so much bigger. Now get the f*ck back on topic. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus spake

qmail pop3d startup

2001-07-03 Thread David Dahl
-- Hello all: I followed LWQ's directions for setting up qmail-pop3d: it wont start up and i get this in my messages log: Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: Starting qmail: done Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: qmail-pop3d service not running Jul 3 10:37:44 mckenna qmail: /etc/rc3.d/S80qmail:

Re: HELP: 4.4.2 error

2001-07-03 Thread Greg White
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:45:32PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: Hi all. I'm running qmail and ezmlm-idx. Yesterday, the log start to say deferral: Connected_to_200.0.218.99_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ for each address with doamin siderar.com. The problem is that 74% of the

Re: qmail pop3d startup

2001-07-03 Thread David Dahl
i think my problem is that i did not install daemontools... whoops... so when i try to make daemontools: [root@mckenna daemontools-0.70]# make ./compile tai64nlocal.c tai64nlocal.c: In function `main': tai64nlocal.c:54: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast

Re: qmail pop3d startup

2001-07-03 Thread Paul Farber
I got the same thing... it *probibly* a header problem (not sure... looked good to me). just comment out the lines and recompile... its not a critical program. Just edit the tai64nlocal.c and put a double hash '//' (no quotes) on the lines listed and it will compile install. -- Paul Farber

Re: qmail pop3d startup

2001-07-03 Thread David Dahl
Title: Re: qmail pop3d startup i am a moron! i am talking to myself... from the qmail list archives== Mike Jackson wrote: Hi, Box is Mandrake 8.0 final, kernel 2.4.3-20mdk. I get the following error when trying to compile daemontools. It also happened to me on a Redhat 7.1 box. I

Blank lines in .qmail files

2001-07-03 Thread John R. Levine
I've been reading through the source code of qmail-local to be sure I'm telling the truth about what it does in the qmail book. I see that if the first line of a .qmail file is blank, qmail-local dies with a temporary failure code. Other blank lines are ignored, but there's a specific test and

weird qmail-popup behaviour?

2001-07-03 Thread Arjen van Drie
Uhmm, something I don't get. When I run as root by hand: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.pop3.cdb -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup my.hostname.ext /bin/checkpassword \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 I get: [arjen@bami arjen]$ telnet my.hostname.ext 110