are
"especially prevalent with qmail"?
I know of many other such prevalent problems. How'd qmail get to be so
responsible for everybody else's problems?
Again, just curious.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
that just 3-10%
what should I do??
some that my work:
- increase control/concurrencyremote (max number depends especially on
amount of RAM)
- check your internet link
- decrease control/queuelifetime
-waskita-
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
. Sorry
if I am missing something really silly! Where did I go wrong?
Did you send a HUP to qmail-send?
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
|| maildirmake ./Maildir
./Maildir/
" splogger qmail
Or some such, depending on which shell environment. The above is bash.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
, the time on your workstation looks pretty wrong, almost 19 hours
behind.
More like 13 hours.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
action.
Perhaps in qmail 1.2. {:~)
For those using the shell, there are some MUAs that allow changing the
From/Reply-to. Mutt comes to mind. There are probably others that can be
configured to do so.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
?.
o_206.250.5.2_but_sender_was_rejected./Remote_host_said:_451_[EMAIL PROTECTED]..._Sender_domain_must_resolve/
How about letting us see the other relevant log entries to that failure so we
have a chance to see what might be wrong that you're overlooking?
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
: unable to bind: address already used
What is this?
When you removed qmail-smtpd from inetd.conf, did you restart inetd?
'kill -HUP [pid of qmail-smtpd]'
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 06:12:29PM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
From: Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you removed qmail-smtpd from inetd.conf, did you restart inetd?
'kill -HUP [pid of qmail-smtpd]'
Ooops.
That should have been 'kill -HUP [pid of inetd]'.
But, you figured it out
.*;*.!=warn -/var/log/mail
and kill -HUP PID of syslogd
If that helps, then certainly logging is part of the speed issue.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://online-isp.com
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 12:21:58PM -0400, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
Ah, the truth comes out...
Now does anyone know how to insert carriage returns under FreeBSD 3.0?
What shell?
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://ole.net
who have a problem.
Seconded with enthusiasm.
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://ole.net
that option in the make
file?
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://ole.net
Did the list die, or am I just fallen and can't get up?
`*8
--
Brad Shelton On Line Exchange http://ole.net
/projects/qmail/mailquotacheck/mailquotacheck.sh
It needs to be in system path, or specified with full path/filename, but I
had to quit using it when I upgraded to qmail 1.03 (unfortutnate. Worked
great).
I have no real idea why. It just wouldn't work anymore after installing
1.03.
--
Brad Shelton
On Mon, Mar 22, 1999 at 07:37:45AM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Is it possible to run both sendmail and qmail on the one machine
I need to install innd adnd it requires sendmail apparently
I'm running innd with qmail. Seems to work just fine.
--
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED
be running on the mail server, where users cannot
normally log in, and where you only want to let them
run certain commands.
So script the .qmail creation for each user to be locked down by root
permissions.
What's the big deal?
--
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Line Exchange
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Joel Eriksson wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Brad Shelton wrote:
But it might be running on the mail server, where users cannot
normally log in, and where you only want to let them
run certain commands.
So script the .qmail creation
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 06:12:05PM -0500, Scott Schwartz wrote:
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:59:24PM -0500, Scott Schwartz wrote:
| Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | What mean things can happen if a user pipes the message to a command
process.
The problems I had with it seemed only two, filling up my syslog and hogging
the smtp port, slowing down legitimate smtp activity.
I ended up blocking them at the router.
I wonder if this was in any way related to this rcpt to attack?
--
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Line
ld change From: line
differently AND(!) serialmail should send this mail thru different
SMTP server.
You could try mutt, if you're not resistant to terminal mode mail clients.
`*8
--
Brad Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Line Exchange http://ole.net
Detroit News http://detnews.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
