RE: Log Entry question

2001-06-13 Thread David U.
a) They are the timestamp in tai64 format b) you are probably running another MTA or another instance of Qmail on por 25. c) 25 Megs of logs isn't very bad...don't sweat it. Just kill whatever's on port 25. maybe a reboot will fix it if you don't know how to do that. -davidu -Original Mes

URGENT: Qmail-remote gone nuts

2001-06-14 Thread David U.
Hi, this morning I awoke to find some 6000 emails in my inbox from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- they were the same exact 6000 emails. The inbox is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also in my ps list, I have about 80 qmail-remote spawns that look like this: 998 ?S 0:00 | | \_ qmail-remote

RE: URGENT: Qmail-remote gone nuts

2001-06-14 Thread David U.
3 GMT #562573 810632 <> remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14 Jun 2001 11:31:23 GMT #562772 830666 <> remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, davidu -Original Message- From: David U. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:33 AM To: Qmail@List. Cr. Yp

RE: URGENT: Qmail-remote gone nuts

2001-06-14 Thread David U.
-Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Yeah, he probably won't lose any important messages... heh, yeah, I *would* want to do that. >No, queue-fix fixes corrupt queues. To delete and rebuild, you should >"rm -rf /var/qmail/queue" and "make setup check" from the q

RE: URGENT: Qmail-remote gone nuts

2001-06-15 Thread David U.
top. Qmail will balk at this, but vpopmail freaks out. I would double check the .qmail files for that virtual user. -K "Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup." > From: "David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Th

RE: Secondary MX - worth it?

2001-06-21 Thread David U.
John, Secondary MX is a DNS procedure that mail servers simply need to be "aware" of. In a real situation your backup MX will just spool the mail until you come back up and then automatically pass it back to you over SMTP. No need for pop or imap or anything. Unless you're doing UUCP or someth

qmail-send FROM address

2001-07-06 Thread David U.
Hi, when email bounces from my server it sends a header like this: ---START--- Hi. This is the qmail-send program at scooby.gangstabitches.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAI

Monitoring MX spools -- is it possible?

2001-07-10 Thread David U.
Hi, I provide secondary mail service to a small group (<10) of users so I don't need to really watch how much mail I spool when (if) they go down. In the future I would like to be able to provide MX service to all my clients (1000+) -- Granted most have little to no downtime, I would like to

Re: Monitoring MX spools -- is it possible?

2001-07-11 Thread David U.
At 11:38 AM 7/11/2001 -0400, Dave Sill wrote: >"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I would like the ability to give all clients backup mail service for 7 days > >and no more then say 10 megs -- whichever comes first. > > > >Since I am just acc

Re: Monitoring MX spools -- is it possible?

2001-07-11 Thread David U.
At 11:10 AM 7/11/2001, Dave Sill wrote: >"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Could you explain what you mean by a "maildir spool" and maildirsmtp? I am > >going to try to look up info right now, but I haven't heard of maildirsmtp. > &

RE: Prejudice and control

2001-08-07 Thread David U.
Do we know how DJB filtered this client MUA? I think it'd be interesting to see how he choose to do it since I think there is more then one way. Thanks, davidu > -Original Message- > From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:30 AM > To: [EMAIL