On 28-May-2001 David T. Ashley wrote:
> This is a very subjective matter, but the tone of the
> automatically-generated messages seems too freindly. For example, there was
> a bounce message today which ended with "Sorry it didn't work out!". It
> seems too casual, too friendly, too persona
On 28-May-2001 george wrote:
> what is this ? How to solve the problem ,if I want to use g++?
Why do you want to use a C++ compiler to compile what is a
pure 'C' program (apart from one // comment)?
Stefaan
--
How's it supposed to get the respect of management if you've got just
one guy work
On 15-May-2001 Uwe Ohse wrote:
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Please stop flaming lusers until you get your MUA to stop sending
> superfluous default information. Thanks.
How dare you criticize Gnus :-)
>
> > | People who are as stupid as you h
On 06-Mar-2001 Rod... Whitworth wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 11:40:29 +0100 (MET), Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
>
> On 04-Mar-2001 Rod... Whitworth wrote:
> > Does this have any bearing on his problem? I don't know as I have not
> > been following it in detail.
On 04-Mar-2001 Rod... Whitworth wrote:
> Does this have any bearing on his problem? I don't know as I have not
> been following it in detail. The - just hit my eye.
The - is in the MTA generated Received: lines. AFAIK, it's
the standard way to indicate "no offset from UTC".
Stefaan
--
>From Kari's header:
> Received: (qmail 1259 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 05:15:11 -
> Received: from kb2.ksbase.com (HELO k4.ksbase.com) (216.126.66.211) by
> kb3.ksbase.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 05:15:11 -
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:28:30 -0500
> I am not talking about c
On 28-Feb-2001 dennis wrote:
> My qmail project, only 1 week away from implementation, was canned, we are
> now moving to Lotus Notes.
Condolences. A company I used to work with also replaced the qmail
I installed (and which had worked flawlessly for 18 months) with
Notes (they wanted shared c
On 17-Feb-2001 Jankok, Lucio wrote:
> the sendmail installation we want to replace has a mailertable of +/- 24 entries
> which tells the mta where to relay mails for a specific domain.
> the syntax goes like this;
> domain.org mta1.otherdomain.org
> sub.domain.org mta2.differentdomain.
On 14-Feb-2001 Peter Green wrote:
> * Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010213 16:29]:
> > Jeremy Suo-Anttila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > anyone know how i can import 350 email addy's from a text file into ezmlm ?
> >
> > `man ezmlm-sub`.
>
> Dear Sirs:
>
> I just tried the comman
On 07-Feb-2001 Michael Maier wrote:
> Someone knows why I get fatal: data 451 qq write error or disk full
> (#4.3.0) ?
> It comes after different Message Counts when sending via SMTP.
> I think there is an Error in that qmail-smtpd. Any Solutions ?
> Never seen that on Linux btw.
Are you us
On 04-Feb-2001 Sumith Ail wrote:
> There is hardly anybody using this server...please let me know how can I find out
>which
> process is using so much of memory.
This is perfectly normal. Linux stashes as much files as possible into
its disk cache. When a process needs more memory, the cache
On 04-Feb-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I love their claims of scalibility with their mail server. "UNIX-like
> > scalability at a fraction of the cost". Hurrumph. How much does it cost
> > to put Linux and Qmail on an old Pentium or Pentium II?
>
> I would guess at around $10,000 for t
On 27-Nov-2000 Paul Jarc wrote:
> Programs - or rather, algorithms - *are* patentable in the US. You
> may think this is a ridiculous idea, and I may agree with you, but
> it's true nonetheless.
That's not true. Algorithms are specifically _not_ patentable
in the US. What _is_ patentable is a
On 22-Aug-2000 Rick Glunt wrote:
> 1) Open to suggestion to replace fetchmail
It's not too bad, and not the cause of your problem.
I suppose you use fetchmail to inject the mail into
qmail, and you then read it using a mailer of sorts.
Knowing which mailer would be a help.
> 2) Error messag
On 25-Jun-2000 Mark Thomas wrote:
> ** How cool! I didn't know you could su username without a password.
> ** Novell/NT protects the user login. You have to change thier password to
> login as the ** user..
You can if you're logged in as root, the rationale being that
if you can change their p
Hi,
It's not a qmail question, but because many of you are in the
high-volume mail business, I hope to get a few answers :-)
A colleague of mine works for a place where they're going to
change from an X400 system to MS Exchange. I don't have details
on the hardware, but they're planning on using
On 16-May-2000 Adam McKenna wrote:
> I was browsing amazon today and noticed it:
>
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0672319454/qid%3D958501880/104-5030846-4577265
>
> Who the hell is Rich Blum? I never hoid of him.
And why does he say Qmail when anyone knowledgable enough
to wri
On 10-Apr-2000 Eric Poubeau wrote:
> My problem:
>
> I have a small server, and I dont want sent too big mail,
> so I want to sort e-mail BEFORE sending, catch too big mail,
> grep and convert attachements, re-sent mail with just a pointer to
> attachement and text/plain.
>
> Ho
Hi list,
I've got a colleague who claims that many ISPs (he lives in
Canada, so probably Canadian ISPs) refuse mail based on the
MAIL FROM: command. To me, that seems inane and futile, but
as I'm not an ISP, and don't work for one either, I'm
solliciting the views of people in the know.
The qm
On 30-Sep-99 Fred Backman wrote:
> 2761: open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) Err#13 EACCES
> 2761: open("/dev/zero", O_RDONLY) Err#13 EACCES
> ...
Check the privileges on /devices/pseudo/mm@0:zero, they should be
something like:
crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys
Kent,
Any chance you could let me have the addresses of some of these Exchange +
Virus wall setups?
On 30-Jun-99 Kent Nilsen wrote:
> Hello, I'm a happy qmail user, except that we are beginning to have more and
> more trouble connecting to people as they install new Exchange servers and
>
On 30-Apr-99 Chris Green wrote:
> No! "Most companies" do *not* "have someone dedicated to the task of
> looking after email". This is what I have been trying to get across
> to this list, nothing more. There are an increasing number of
> (potential) qmail users who can't possibly afford
On 01-Feb-99 Dave Sill wrote:
> I disagree. Yes, I could configure my server to pass everything off to
> the ISP's mail hub, but, frankly, I can do a better job of it than
> they can. And switching to a more competant ISP is not an
> option. Where I live, there's only one ISP that's reachabl
On 04-Jan-99 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > IIRC, qmail-queue should not be called by someone wanting to submit mail
> > (see doc/PIC*). A better test would be to use qmail-inject:
>
> Doesn't qmail-inject call qmail-queue eventually anyway? So this is just
> a timing issue.
Maybe (I haven't looke
> And how to fix kill -9?
There's little one can do about that (having signals that
can't be caught is a UNIX design decision). I could imagine
UNIX with kill -9 disabled for all but the super-user (a bit
like the effect of quotas on chown in SunOS). It all depends
on how paranoid you are :-)
St
On 04-Jan-99 Mate Wierdl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 1999 at 01:03:14PM +, Sam wrote:
> >
> > > : :% /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
> > > : :^Z
> > > : :Suspended
> > > : :% kill -9 %1
> > > : :[1]Killed /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
> > > : :%
> > > : :
> >
26 matches
Mail list logo
