On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:53:15PM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote:
Maybe we should make this list moderated? I for one would volunteer to
help moderate the list.
Second idea Maybe the list maintainer should implement qmail-scanner or
some other virus scanner in the list, so that infected
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 12:04:18PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Fortunately, I'm using Linux -- but I fear it will only be a matter of
time before Linux too will be the victim of worm attacks like this.
Sorry to continue this somewhat off topic thread
I think it's really an issue of user
Doesn't EZMLM support rejecting attachments and / or rejecting emails from
off list posters ? I can see why this list might want to stay open
(although it would be nice if it weren't) but allowing attachments to a
mailing list seems like a bad idea on many fronts.
w
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:41:12PM +0300, Constantine Koulis wrote:
virtual users to my virtual DOmains.
Do i need or to take care anything special about all this?
i am at the final step of the mailman.
how do i setup an aliasses for a user in qmail cause mailman wants aliases
with a user.
we use courier-imapd with no problems on our office mailserver, and some
people here use Outlook with no problems. While courier can be a pain at
times it's probably the best solution. You could also try UW imapd with the
(unofficial) Maildir patches.
i don't think anyone has problems moving
Well if the problem is name resolutions, why not just install bind on the
machine itself (in a caching-only configuration)? Then make it listen only
on 127.0.0.1 and make this the primary resolver for the machine.
w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:32:53AM -0700, James Stevens wrote:
I had a
you should make sure that one server is configured to be a backup.
there's no way to make email go to BOTH machines; if you set them to
equal weights, they will (in theory) each get about half the mail. you
shouldn't do this unless you know what you are doing. you could also
setup one as a
SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME
COMMAND
32076 qmails20 0 396 396 308 R 0 90.5 0.0 778:11
qmail-send
19851 root 2 0 1276 1276 680 R 0 2.8 0.2 0:00 top
Jörgen Persson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:39:43AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Jörgen Persson wrote
the debian source package for 1.03) or with the library mentioned
(crt1.0). the machine is debian / potato (2.2) GNU / Linux
w
Jörgen Persson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:36:51AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
zugzug# ll
total 16
drwxr-x---2 qmailq qmail4096 Mar 30 2000
)?
aside from installing dot-forward and fastforward which I don't need
since the system already uses .qmail files and qmail style aliases it
seemed to work pretty well.
w
Will Yardley wrote:
sweet thanks for pointing this out. sorry to be so obtuse, but can
you explain how it should be?
make
I'm new to the list so feel free to flog me if these questions are
archived somewhere (i haven't been able to turn up anything on a couple
of searches).
1)
I'm running qmail on a debian box; i'm pretty sure it was built from the
qmail-src 1.03-14 debian source package. there has been some
don't see one.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Will Yardley
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 4:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail-send cpu and imapd / Maildir
Jörgen Persson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 01:25:20AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
i've heard from a couple people that the qmail-send process is
supposed to take up all the avail cpu when nothing else is using it;
is that right?
Hardly -- what does the log say?
Jörgen
well
13 matches
Mail list logo
