I have a lot of trigger-happy users who seem to enjoy double
clicking attachments. Most of the time, a few hours after a major
virus is discovered, we have an update made, but in the meanwhile we
could have had hundreds of e-mails come in with the virus.
Our environment runs Windows, and we find
Well,
I agree wholeheartedly, it's a must to have the desktop covered, but if
you don't try to catch the virii coming in, you'll never have any idea
about what comes in by mail, as most users will soon not tell you about
it anymore.
I use amavis on the internet connected systems, and inflex on
ly :)
(My favorite is Sophos with-in qmail, I LIKE IT, but this letter isn't meant
to
be a plug.)
Cheers
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Wolff III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Jérémy Cluzel
Cc: Qmail cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:23:20AM +0100,
Jérémy Cluzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and wath about scanners ? which is the best one ? and why ?
> are they really needed for such antivirus ?
> I've heard that some AV (live avp) have their own scanner (which tends to
> replace amavis or qmail sca
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]amavis or qmail-scanner ?
> >2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ?
I used avp for a while
> >(and I find it very effi
>2) as antivirus ? H+BEDV AntiVir, AVP, Sophos Sweep,or McAfee ViruScan ? I used avp
>for a while
>(and I find it very efficient), but doesn't know the other ones...
Don't know about H+BEDV AntiVir
McAfee is currently best for detecting new viruses, and has been for a while
AVP is also good at
