On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Filip Salomonsson wrote:
> Me:
> > Sure. But while it's there, why not make it as useful as possible? I'm not
> > saying that there's anything wrong with the way Delivered-To lines are
> > written today. I'm only suggesting something that I think would
> >
Me:
> Sure. But while it's there, why not make it as useful as possible? I'm not
> saying that there's anything wrong with the way Delivered-To lines are
> written today. I'm only suggesting something that I think would
> be a better solution.
Let me withdraw that comment. Delivered-To is obvious
Filip Salomonsson:
> > Also, any message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will have "Delivered-To:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the header, which is confusing.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be "correct". As would
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the "me" control file says
> > kepler.netdesign.se).
Peter van Dijk:
> De
Filip Salomonsson:
> >The -owner files render themselves completely useless.
Dave Sill:
> So create ~salo/.qmail-salo-filip-owner or ~salo/.qmail-salo-default.
Well, that's what I've done. Works like a charm. But what if there was a
salo@ address(and/or salo-filip@ with a corresponding -owner fi
"Filip Salomonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A message is recieved for [EMAIL PROTECTED], delivered locally to
>salo-filip, which puts the message in my maildir and forwards a copy to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] The envelope sender for the forwarded message is set to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], just as the doc
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 05:03:59PM +0200, Filip Salomonsson wrote:
[snip]
> Oh, great. here's a line from my virtualdomains file:
> netdesign.se:salo
>
> in ~salo/.qmail-filip:
> ./Maildir/
> &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> in ~salo/.qmail-filip-owner:
> &[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> A message is re
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Filip Salomonsson wrote:
> [snip]
> > Qmail isn't handling virtual domains correctly, as far as I can tell.
Peter van Dijk:
> Wut?
> Greetz, Peter.
>From the dot-qmail man page:
When qmail-local forwards a message as instructed in
.q
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Filip Salomonsson wrote:
[snip]
> Qmail isn't handling virtual domains correctly, as far as I can tell.
Wut?
Greetz, Peter.
* Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 19:43]:
> Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> > just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> >
Thus spake Johan Almqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> bouncing.
And what is your problem with that?
Felix
Johan Almqvist:
> > With a few pointers from Frank Tegtmeyer, I've now made what I wanted
> > myself. Maybe someone else finds this useful...
Peter van Dijk:
> Without testing it, a short glance over the code reveals one quirk and
> one change I'd like:
>
> - You are using a predictable filename
> - It says 'this is the qmail-send program'. It is not. 'qmail-send' is
> not a fixed string in the QSBMF, so why not change it?
True - when I first wrote it I took the text from Qmails bounces.
Feel free to change it :)
Regards, Frank
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:06:40PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 11:21]:
> > I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> > just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actua
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010329 11:21]:
> I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
> just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
> bouncing.
With a few pointers from Frank Tegtmeyer, I've now ma
Hi!
I wonder if anyone has written a real "bouncesaying" (qmails bouncesaying
just exits with an exit code that makes qmail-local do the actual
bouncing.
I want to pipe a message to bouncesaying from mutt, like this:
| boucesaying "No subject specified"
and it should us
15 matches
Mail list logo
