On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
[snip]
- suggestion : I really miss this feature from vacation in your autoresponder:
If the string $SUBJECT appears in the .vacation.msg file,
it is replaced with
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 10:42:35AM -0400, Thomas Erskine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Sounds reasonable. I had been thinking of some way of putting the
original subject into the response. The other way I was thinking of
doing it would be a command-line option to add
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Thomas Erskine wrote:
The original sender gets added as a "To:" line, the date is
auto-generated as is the message-id, and the original recipient can be
emulated by putting a "From:" line and "Return-Path:" into the message
file. Why in the world
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 06:28:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I consider it to be an absolute requirement for any autoresponder to not
reply to a message that isn't addressed to the recipient it is acting on
behalf of. Anything else is just begging for the sort of exponential
autoresponder
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 06:28:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I consider it to be an absolute requirement for any autoresponder to
not reply to a message that isn't addressed to the recipient it is
acting on behalf of.
And that's part of why it's
Version 0.90 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
Development versions of qmail-autoresponder are available via anonymous CVS.
Set your CVSROOT to ":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/CVS",
login with an empty password, and check out the
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 06:10:45AM -,
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version 0.90 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
I took a look at it any it seems pretty nice. However around here we
still use reflectors on the main
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 09:08:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I took a look at it any it seems pretty nice. However around here we
still use reflectors on the main mailservers and having a check for
the recipient's address in the recipient headers is needed. I don't
know if enough other
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 06:10:45AM -, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Version 0.90 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
Thanks for this update! :)
one question, and one suggestion :
- is it possible / planned to use this autoresponder with
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 09:07:19AM -0600,
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 09:08:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I took a look at it any it seems pretty nice. However around here we
still use reflectors on the main mailservers and having a check for
the
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 06:10:45AM -, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Version 0.90 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
one question, and one suggestion :
- is it possible /
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 11:00:00AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Reflectors are something sendmail has. You can have system wide aliases
that just deliver the message to more addresses. The alias can actually
point to file. For these kinds of messages, the tests you are using
won't see the
Bruno Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reflectors are something sendmail has. You can have system wide aliases
that just deliver the message to more addresses. The alias can actually
point to file. For these kinds of messages, the tests you are using
won't see the mail as list mail.
If you
13 matches
Mail list logo
