"Ian Layton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for all the comments I received about my previous question.
I am now needing to make a program that will analyses bounced messages from
Qmail and be able to distinguish between hard (permanent bounces) and soft
(temporary) bounces. Is there any
Thank you for all the comments I received about my previous question.
I am now needing to make a program that will analyses bounced messages from
Qmail and be able to distinguish between hard (permanent bounces) and soft
(temporary) bounces. Is there any standard out there on how to recognize
"Marsha Petry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Somebody mentioned a Japanese website that has performance stats
(http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/).
That was me.
That same writer mentioned that
qmail did good on the comparisons, but honestly, I don't know what the
graphs mean just looking at
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Marsha Petry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Somebody mentioned a Japanese website that has performance stats
(http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/).
That was me.
Perhaps I'm a little bit stupid but could you tell me/us how we can get
some more
Martin Lesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Marsha Petry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Somebody mentioned a Japanese website that has performance stats
(http://www.kyoto.wide.ad.jp/mta/eval1/).
That was me.
Perhaps I'm a little bit stupid but could you
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my original message I suggested looking at the graphs. They're
labeled in English, and pretty easy to decipher.
Sorry - you're right. In this moment I wrote a msg to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He/she is responsibel for the mentioned
site. Perhaps I can get a
I'm new to qmail (infact, just evaluating it, not using it yet) and have
some questions.
I was searching the archives for qmail performance issues, and found a
couple things I don't understand:
1. Somebody mentioned a Japanese website that has performance stats
