Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-24 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:41:22PM -0600, Mike Hodson wrote: > Hello there. > I have been noticing slightly out of the ordinary things happening in my > qmail-send logs after changing the queue filesystem over to reiserfs. > I am seeing the same inode used for multiple messages. Is this normal? Y

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-23 Thread Adrian Ho
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:30:01PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote: > I'm currently about to go live with new ReiserFS based Qmail servers, and > haven't noticed any problem. If there is, I'd certainly like to know... :-) I'm running qmail on several boxen, all ReiserFS-only. Not a single problem to dat

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-23 Thread Jason Haar
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:45:57AM +0200, Lordy wrote: > Hi Mike, > > this is a known issue with ReiserFS. As you might now, Ext2 and ReiserFS > have many differences and you are just experiencing one of them. The whole > problem is documented unter www.namesys.com (the homepage of ReiserFS) > so

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-23 Thread MarkD
Er whatever other issues may or may not be associated with ReiserFS, re-use of inodes does not present a problem for qmail and is commonly seen on UFS. If you look at the log fragment carefully you'll see that the inode is only reused after the message has been delivered and thus the file deleted

Re: Inode allocation / qmail-queue?

2001-07-23 Thread Lordy
Hi Mike, this is a known issue with ReiserFS. As you might now, Ext2 and ReiserFS have many differences and you are just experiencing one of them. The whole problem is documented unter www.namesys.com (the homepage of ReiserFS) so you will find the information you need there. In general you have