"David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>don't you have to learn all the saxophone-esque emacs keyboard
>things to use it?
It's got menus now so you can avoid 99% of the key bindings.
-Dave
Brett Randall wrote:
> Under X? Try Gnus. It doesn't just work properly in strange
> situations, it works properly in normal situations as well!
don't you have to learn all the saxophone-esque emacs keyboard
things to use it?
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PRO
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> > Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Under X? Try Gnus. It doesn't just work properly in strange
> > >situations, it works properly in normal situations as well! And it is
> > >the MOST real M
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dave Sill wrote:
> Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Under X? Try Gnus. It doesn't just work properly in strange
> >situations, it works properly in normal situations as well! And it is
> >the MOST real MUA you will ever find. It can be pretty...run it under
> >X
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Under X? Try Gnus. It doesn't just work properly in strange
>situations, it works properly in normal situations as well! And it is
>the MOST real MUA you will ever find. It can be pretty...run it under
>XEmacs.
I think we need a Gnus "deprogrammer". Soch
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:04:14 PDT, Mike Glover wrote:
>Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
> Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
> properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
> broken" and "not vaporware", though.
I persona
I can't believe that someone actually said this. You don't want *NIX
then, boot up your Windows box and have at it.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Mike Glover wrote:
>Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:04:14PM -0700, Mike Glover wrote:
>Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
> Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
> properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
> broken" and "not vaporware", though.
ht
* Mike Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001011 01:06]:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > Not using microshaft brokenware. Use a real MUA, for example, Mutt,
> > which you tell what mailing lists you subscribe to, and then use the
> > List-Reply-To (L) when replying. It also generates Ma
Mike Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
> Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
> properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
> broken" and "not vaporware", though.
>
> -mike
>
Under X?
Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
broken" and "not vaporware", though.
-mike
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Not using microshaft
11 matches
Mail list logo