> > I'm running Solaris and am looking at the possibility of having the queue on
> > tmpfs so it's in RAM. Of course, on reboot or crash the directory structure
> > would be gone.. how much of this directory structure does qmail expect to
> > find, and how much of it will it create on the fly
Paul Watkins writes:
> I'm operating a system that doesn't need the reliability that queueing
> affords - speed is all that counts, because after 10 minutes any email that
> hasn't gotten out is out-of-date and worthless - such is the unique nature
> of our system. Since I've got to get out 1
I'm finding that the hard disk is the massive bottleneck in achieving this.
I'm running Solaris and am looking at the possibility of having the queue on
tmpfs so it's in RAM. Of course, on reboot or crash the directory structure
would be gone.. how much of this directory structure doe
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 02:21:12PM -0500, Paul Watkins wrote:
> I'm operating a system that doesn't need the reliability that queueing
> affords - speed is all that counts, because after 10 minutes any email that
> hasn't gotten out is out-of-date and worthless - such is the unique nature
> of our
I'm operating a system that doesn't need the reliability that queueing
affords - speed is all that counts, because after 10 minutes any email that
hasn't gotten out is out-of-date and worthless - such is the unique nature
of our system. Since I've got to get out 10,000 emails in a few minutes,
I'
