Re: Quick question

2001-08-13 Thread Lukas Beeler
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:13:38AM +, mike wrote: > but why so many process running as root? Here's my process list. > I understand all of it except the first 5 qmail uses many more processes than sendmail, which is one monolithic programm, running as root. If you look at your "ps aux" a

Quick question

2001-08-13 Thread mike
I'm fairly new to qmail. I was a sendmail fan forever till I got bored and decided to switch to qmail. So far I love it. I started readin the lifewithmail homepage and decided to try it out. I've got everything installed and running but 1 thing puzzles me, I know it's probably a goofy questi

RE: Quick question re maildir

2001-07-05 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Joshua Nichols wrote: >> weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the >> general consensus is that the "maildir" method is the way to >> go. Appreciate comments/advice. > >Absolutely. > >Check the archives, there's alot of info there about th

Re: Quick question re maildir

2001-07-05 Thread Charles Cazabon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maildirs are incredibly easy to manipulate with shell or Perl or > Python, more reliable than mailbox, and can be locked over NFS. Small correction: Maildirs need no locking, even over NFS. Charles -- ---

Re: Quick question re maildir

2001-07-05 Thread dsr
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:30:52PM +1200, Steve Reed wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the great help from this group in the past. I plan > to begin the migration process to qmail in the coming days and > weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the > general consensus is that

RE: Quick question re maildir

2001-07-05 Thread Joshua Nichols
> weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the > general consensus is that the "maildir" method is the way to > go. Appreciate comments/advice. Absolutely. Check the archives, there's alot of info there about the benefits of Maildirs. Recently, someone posted some excellent

Quick question re maildir

2001-07-05 Thread Steve Reed
Hi all, Thanks for the great help from this group in the past. I plan to begin the migration process to qmail in the coming days and weeks, and as part of the planning process am wondering if the general consensus is that the "maildir" method is the way to go. Appreciate comments/advice. C

Re: quick question on queuing mails

2000-10-27 Thread markd
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 02:37:42PM -0700, marlon abao (TS-US) wrote: > guys, > > just a quick question. when qmail recieves mail, does it immediately try to > send it out w/o putting it on the queue? or does it ALWAYS put it in the > queue and have some other process pick it

quick question on queuing mails

2000-10-27 Thread marlon abao (TS-US)
guys, just a quick question. when qmail recieves mail, does it immediately try to send it out w/o putting it on the queue? or does it ALWAYS put it in the queue and have some other process pick it up for delivery? -marlon

Re: quick question (qmail-1.03)

2000-04-09 Thread Keith Warno
Thanks for the responses. - Original Message - From: "Keith Warno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 9:55 PM Subject: quick question (qmail-1.03) Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users: Are th

Re: quick question (qmail-1.03)

2000-04-07 Thread Charles Cazabon
Keith Warno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users: > > Are the numeric uids and gids compiled into the qmail-1.03 programs, or are > the names used? Yes, it's numeric, as the (quicker) reply noted. But you may be interested in Bruce Guenter's qmail RPMs

quick question (qmail-1.03)

2000-04-07 Thread Keith Warno
Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users: Are the numeric uids and gids compiled into the qmail-1.03 programs, or are the names used? I'm assuming (after having some difficulties; read on) the numeric uids/gids are compiled in. Is this a correct assumption? I moved qmail binaries fro

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-11-08 Thread dd
> > | My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr. > > > > In his case, I think he needs to replace: > > > >2>&1 | > > > > with: > > > >|& > > > i had the same question and had this answer: > You can use this notation > > command >& file_name > > but this wi

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-11-07 Thread dd
> |>here's the whole script...short answer is csh: > |> > |>#!/bin/sh > | > | That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell. > | My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr. > > In his case, I think he needs to replace: > >2>&1 | > > with: > >

Re: Quick question

1999-04-28 Thread Dave Sill
"Durham, Kenneth J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was just wondering if qmail will support putting users on 2 diffrent >servers. I would like to split the load between 2 diffrent machines. The >first doing the authentication and storage and the other as a storage. Is >this possible. Thanks I

Re: Quick question

1999-04-28 Thread Adam D. McKenna
http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html --Adam - Original Message - From: Durham, Kenneth J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Dave Sill' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 'Qmail' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Quick questi

RE: Quick question

1999-04-28 Thread Durham, Kenneth J
one other quick question. Were can i find a online documantation that can get me through the setup of qmail from start to finish. Im kinda new so please keep this in mind. I also want to setup pop and smtp thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Quick question

1999-04-28 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 28-Apr-99 Durham, Kenneth J wrote: > one other quick question. Were can i find a online documantation that can > get me through the setup of qmail from start to finish. Im kinda new so > please keep this in mind. I also want to setup pop and smtp thanks for all > your help. Th

Quick question

1999-04-28 Thread Durham, Kenneth J
I was just wondering if qmail will support putting users on 2 diffrent servers. I would like to split the load between 2 diffrent machines. The first doing the authentication and storage and the other as a storage. Is this possible. Thanks

Re:Just a quick question (stupid one at that)

1999-04-27 Thread Ludwig Pummer
At , yessure wrote: >Impossible. > >>Im setting up my mail server but i dont have a valid domain name. will >>qmail work via ip like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? or do >>i have to have a valide domain name to get it to work correctly? Others have already responded that it is

Re:Just a quick question (stupid one at that)

1999-04-27 Thread yessure
Impossible. >Im setting up my mail server but i dont have a valid domain name. will >qmail work via ip like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? or do >i have to have a valide domain name to get it to work correctly? > >

Re: Just a quick question (stupid one at that)

1999-04-26 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ "Durham, Kenneth J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | Im setting up my mail server but i dont have a valid domain name. | will qmail work via ip like [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ? or do i have to have a valide domain | name to get it to work correctly? me@[999.999.999.99] might have a

Re: Just a quick question (stupid one at that)

1999-04-26 Thread Dave Sill
"Durham, Kenneth J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Im setting up my mail server but i dont have a valid domain name. will >qmail work via ip like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? or do >i have to have a valide domain name to get it to work correctly? The system qmail is installed on

Just a quick question (stupid one at that)

1999-04-26 Thread Durham, Kenneth J
Im setting up my mail server but i dont have a valid domain name. will qmail work via ip like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? or do i have to have a valide domain name to get it to work correctly?

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread troy
On 5 Nov, Dave Sill wrote: | Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |>here's the whole script...short answer is csh: |> |>#!/bin/sh | | That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell. | My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr. In his case, I t

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Brandon Dudley
/var/log/qmail/smtpd ot maybe > /var/log/qmail-smtpd? > > -Peter > > > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rbls

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Peter Abplanalp
EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 18:32:12 - > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd > X-PM-Encryptor: QDPGP, 4 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 5 Nov 99, at

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Petr Novotny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5 Nov 99, at 10:26, Peter Abplanalp wrote: > That looks correct as far as the telnet goes. You need to speak SMTP to > it. I don't know why nothing would show up in the logs. What should be in the logs? Unless you start tcpserver with -v optio

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Peter Abplanalp
; run by ezmlm > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd > Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 09:27:41 -0800 > From: Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ok, so I dumped my old rc sc

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Brandon Dudley
ok, so I dumped my old rc script and modified Dave Sill's with the rblsmtpd entry I was using (taken from the qmail archives)smtpd starts and all seems hunk dory, except when I telnet into port 25 I don't receive a greeting from rblsmtpd...is that normal? Here's the mods I made: [brandon@m

RE: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Greg Owen
> Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >here's the whole script...short answer is csh: > > > >#!/bin/sh > > That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell. > My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr. To redirect both stdin and stderr to

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Dave Sill
Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >here's the whole script...short answer is csh: > >#!/bin/sh That's the problem: you're using Bourne shell syntax in the C Shell. My csh skills are rusty; I can't remember how to redirect stderr. -Dave

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Brandon Dudley
here's the whole script...short answer is csh: #!/bin/sh # # qmail /etc/init.d script for qmail (http://www.qmail.org/) # # Version: @(#) /etc/init.d/qmail 1.00 03-Sep-1997 # # Author: Larry Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # derived from skeleton by Miquel van Smoo

Re: quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Dave Sill
Brandon Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was using this command in /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail before, but now it is not >working. > >/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -q -u >16 -g51 -t1 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /usr/local/bin >/rblsmtpd -rrelays.orbs.org /

quick question re: starting with rblsmtpd

1999-01-03 Thread Brandon Dudley
I was using this command in /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail before, but now it is not working. /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -q -u 16 -g51 -t1 0 smtp /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrelays.radparker.com /usr/local/bin /rblsmtpd -rrelays.orbs.org /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -rrbl.maps.vix.com /usr/l