Greg Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the reliability of qmail and related tools, I've always
>wondered why supervise came about ;>. You can use it or not, as you prefer.
Because "reliability means never having to say you're sorry"
(DJB). The key word there is "never". If you don't
> One other thing now. I want to use multilog to log on
> machines not running supervise, because we just want
> simple set up and I want to be able to parse the log
> files through either qmailanalog or qmail-mrtg (any
> recommendations here?). Is this easy to do?
Sure, just replace 's
-Original Message-
From: Greg Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 11:04 PM
Subject: RE: Diff between Supervise & Tcpserver?
>
>> Hi guys. This is probly a simple question but I can't
>> find an obv
> Hi guys. This is probly a simple question but I can't
> find an obvious answer anywhere.As far as I can tell,
> there are three ways to run Qmail: Inetd (yuck), tcpserver
> (regular), and supervisor (??).
Inetd and tcpserver are programs designed to accept traffic on a
port and start a
