On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:58:17PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
Hmm, did you install from the ports or did you install from the tarball?
I installed qmail from the ports on an up-to-date 4.2-stable on
Friday, works fine. Didn't patch it, just made some adjustments
to the invocation to use
Hi,
this problem
At 18:07 4.2.2001 -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
Then when i try to connect to port 25, it says UNABLE TO READ
CONTROLS #4.3.0...how do I fix this? Cheers, Bruce
is usually attached to the fact, that qmail was not compiled to the
standard patch, ie. /var/qmail and you
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2? I installed it from the ports and it does
not work. When I try to run it..the qmaill/q/r/p/s users don't even run the process,
but instead some unknown uid running the qmail-send and other
Thanks everyone for helping out...I think it is
going to work now :...
Regards,
Bruce
Now, if I had a $1 every time I have heard that one, then i'd be rich
enough to hire someone to set it up for you.
:)
Regards
Nick
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dang
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: Qmail on FreebSD 4.2-STABLE
Thanks
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
Nothing.
I installed it from the ports and it does not work.
Ask the port's maintainer, or try installing it without the port, from the qmail
tarball, according to the instructions in the
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:12:05PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
Nothing.
I installed it from the ports and it does not work.
Ask the port's maintainer, or try installing it without the
ject: Re: Qmail on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:12:05PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
Nothing.
I installed it from the ports and it does not work.
Ask the port's mai
Slightly offtopic but are people allowed to distribute qmail in this
manner? I thought there was a clause somewhere for most DJB software?
I'm curious for cases like mass rollout, or maybe bundling as part of a
product. For example I prefer /var/dns/cache vs /etc/dnscache. Or qmail
spool
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:55:26AM +0800, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
Slightly offtopic but are people allowed to distribute qmail in this
manner? I thought there was a clause somewhere for most DJB software?
In what manner? Ports downloads the sources on your behalf, applies
patches as the ports
Yup, just went through it again today in fact *grin*
qmail works wonderfully well with 4.2 :)
Laurence
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Boudreaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 8:06 PM
To: Bruce Dang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Qmail on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Am 04.02.2001 um 18:07:15 schrieb Bruce Dang:
Hi Bruce
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
I don't know. I installed it from the ports. Before that I patched it
with the smtp-auth patch. After installation I made some adjustments to
have it run LWQ-like. I did not run into any
12 matches
Mail list logo
