RE: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread Soffen, Matthew
Actually the mail administrator MAY be a non-programmer. (in fact where I work, our postmaster is a tech / system maint person). And I bet that this is more the norm, than an exception. Matt > -Original Message- > From: Mate Wierdl [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 20, 1

Re: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 11:25:57AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: : If you want, I can extract the patches from the src rpm for you. I didn't see an SRPM anywhere...if I had I would have extracted it on my Linux box, but I sure appreciate it :) : What you wrote about patches and nonprogrammers was ex

Re: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread Dave Sill
James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten >a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of >configuration standpoint. 1) Lack of reported vulnerabilities <> more secure. 2) Sendmail's performance

Re: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 August 1999 at 15:51:59 -0400 > James Smallacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten > >a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of > >configuration sta

Re: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:51:59 -0400 (EDT) > > 2) Sendmail's performance still lags far behind current-generation >MTA's. ...and will continue to as long as it runs that stupid rule based system to rewrite addresses that don't need to be rewritten.

Re: pine patches

1999-08-20 Thread Russell Nelson
James Smallacombe writes: > For sure. In the past 3+ years I've been running qmail, Sendmail's gotten > a whole lot better, both from a security standpoint, and an ease of > configuration standpoint. If qmail is going to remain a desirable > alternative, it has to move forward as well. DJB'

Patched source for pine 4.1 w/ Maildir support WAS Re: pine patches

1999-08-21 Thread James Smallacombe
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > What you wrote about patches and nonprogrammers was exactly my point; > for nonprogrammers (and I assume many mail administrators may not be), > it is hard to figure out which patches they need to get for what they > want. www.qmail.org is a great help,