Re: statistics

* Austad, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001013 10:36]: > Does anyone know of any log analyzers for qmail? I need stats on how many > messages are going out, how many of those are bouncing, speed, and whatever > else I can find. qmailanalog and the mrtg packages for qmail. Remember, kids, Security is

RE: statistics

Where are the MRTG pieces for qmail? Also is there any SNMP options for qmail? Thanks Andy -Original Message- From: Robin S. Socha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 9:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: statistics * Austad, Jay <[EM

Re: statistics

also sprach andy: > Where are the MRTG pieces for qmail? What Does The Archive Say(TM)? (See . Search on qmail-mrtg.) (Hint: http://www.prodigysolutions.com/qmail-mrtg.1.0.tar.gz :) /pg -- Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: statistics

just fine too. Jay -Original Message- From: Peter Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 10:15 AM To: Andy Abshagen Cc: Qmail Mailing List Subject: Re: statistics also sprach andy: > Where are the MRTG pieces for qmail? What Does The Archive Say(TM)? (See &l

Re: statistics

also sprach austad: > Hrm, I grabbed qmail analog, I piped one of my logfiles through tai64nfrac > and into zoverall, and I get 0 for completed requests and total delivery > attempts. If I put it through any other program that came with qmail > analog, I get no output. Any idea why this would ha

Re: statistics

* Austad, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001013 11:33]: > Hrm, I grabbed qmail analog, I piped one of my logfiles through tai64nfrac > and into zoverall, and I get 0 for completed requests and total delivery > attempts. If I put it through any other program that came with qmail > analog, I get no outpu

Re: statistics

On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Robin S. Socha wrote: > Because you're stupid? But that's just one reason, Jay, so there's still > hope. Anyway: man I love this list... Scott ps: cc:

Re: statistics inconsistency

On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 07:56:09AM +0100, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote: > Now the strange thing is, all three give back different results (see > below). And now I wonder why. > And it's not that the difference is delivered mail, because I know > that's not the problem. I also know that qmail-qstat

Re: statistics with qmailanalog

* Gesner JEAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [JEAN set up qmailanalog] > 1- make 2- make setup I should have something as follows: > 849347513.939860 running microsecond timestamps - good. > After these two there, I blocked myself, and I visited by evil of > site inorder to find a solution, in vai

Re: statistics with qmailanalog

Hrmm, I am having the same problem I have a bunch of '@#' files... I know the numbers are the microsecounds and thats all fine and dandy but qmail does not seem to be crunching these into a permanet log file.. Hrmmm, am I mising something here? --JT - Original Message - From: "Ges

Re: statistics with qmailanalog

On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:51:35PM -0700, James Stevens wrote: > Hrmm, I am having the same problem I have a bunch of '@#' files... > I know the numbers are the microsecounds and thats all fine and dandy but > qmail does not seem to be crunching these into a permanet log file.. Hrmmm, > am