Am 18.01.2001 um 14:31:26 schrieb Dave Sill:
Hi Dave,
yes I have and it is *exactly* what I need, but if I did not misread the
docu, isoqlog uses syslog and I really would like to keep this away from
syslog.
Argh. You're right. I assumed it was based on multilog since syslog
sucks so
not much reason to use multilog if you're not going to use its rotation
features, unless you're using other features it possesses, like pattern
matching or something. i can't think of what self-rotation would be wiser
than multilog, however.
anyway, check out:
Am 18.01.2001 um 05:04:35 schrieb tc lewis:
Hi Tc,
not much reason to use multilog if you're not going to use its rotation
features,
I just use it because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ.
unless you're using other features it possesses, like pattern
matching or something. i
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
who rotates the logs when using multilog?
multilog
I did not find a manpage for multilog.
There isn't one. See:
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html
I want to avoid the automatic rotation and rotate the logs my
own.
That's hard to do with
This is a start.
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/06/msg00325.
html
-Original Message-
From: Clemens Hermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:17 AM
To: tc lewis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: who rotates the logs?
Am 18.01.2001
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just use [multilog] because I want to stay as close as possible
with LWQ.
I think it's more important to use a configuration that does what you
want than to use any particular "standard" configuration.
My problem is, that I have to pipe the
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:55:53AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not find a manpage for multilog.
There isn't one. See:
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html
There is one, see:
ftp://ftp.innominate.org/pub/pape/djb/
Gerrit.
--
[EMAIL
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote:
I just use it because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ.
I really hope that I don't have to remind everyone of this, but it looks like I
do.
THE REASON THAT WE USE OPEN SYSTEMS IS BECAUSE IT MEANS WE ARE NOT RESTRICTED
BY SOMEONE ELSE'S
Am 18.01.2001 um 09:02:52 schrieb Dave Sill:
Hi Dave,
I just use [multilog] because I want to stay as close as possible
with LWQ.
I think it's more important to use a configuration that does what you
want than to use any particular "standard" configuration.
so far it did what I wanted
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes I have and it is *exactly* what I need, but if I did not misread the
docu, isoqlog uses syslog and I really would like to keep this away from
syslog.
Argh. You're right. I assumed it was based on multilog since syslog
sucks so bad...
-Dave
Am 18.01.2001 um 11:29:44 schrieb Matthew Patterson:
Hi Matthew,
THE REASON THAT WE USE OPEN SYSTEMS IS BECAUSE IT MEANS WE ARE NOT RESTRICTED
BY SOMEONE ELSE'S DECISIONS.
You are perfectly right. But qmail and its relatives are a rather
complex building if you really try to understand every
11 matches
Mail list logo