Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-19 Thread Clemens Hermann
Am 18.01.2001 um 14:31:26 schrieb Dave Sill: Hi Dave, yes I have and it is *exactly* what I need, but if I did not misread the docu, isoqlog uses syslog and I really would like to keep this away from syslog. Argh. You're right. I assumed it was based on multilog since syslog sucks so

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread tc lewis
not much reason to use multilog if you're not going to use its rotation features, unless you're using other features it possesses, like pattern matching or something. i can't think of what self-rotation would be wiser than multilog, however. anyway, check out:

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Clemens Hermann
Am 18.01.2001 um 05:04:35 schrieb tc lewis: Hi Tc, not much reason to use multilog if you're not going to use its rotation features, I just use it because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ. unless you're using other features it possesses, like pattern matching or something. i

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Dave Sill
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: who rotates the logs when using multilog? multilog I did not find a manpage for multilog. There isn't one. See: http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html I want to avoid the automatic rotation and rotate the logs my own. That's hard to do with

RE: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Kevin Bucknum
This is a start. http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/06/msg00325. html -Original Message- From: Clemens Hermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:17 AM To: tc lewis Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: who rotates the logs? Am 18.01.2001

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Dave Sill
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just use [multilog] because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ. I think it's more important to use a configuration that does what you want than to use any particular "standard" configuration. My problem is, that I have to pipe the

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread pape
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:55:53AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote: Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not find a manpage for multilog. There isn't one. See: http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html There is one, see: ftp://ftp.innominate.org/pub/pape/djb/ Gerrit. -- [EMAIL

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Matthew Patterson
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote: I just use it because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ. I really hope that I don't have to remind everyone of this, but it looks like I do. THE REASON THAT WE USE OPEN SYSTEMS IS BECAUSE IT MEANS WE ARE NOT RESTRICTED BY SOMEONE ELSE'S

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Clemens Hermann
Am 18.01.2001 um 09:02:52 schrieb Dave Sill: Hi Dave, I just use [multilog] because I want to stay as close as possible with LWQ. I think it's more important to use a configuration that does what you want than to use any particular "standard" configuration. so far it did what I wanted

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Dave Sill
Clemens Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes I have and it is *exactly* what I need, but if I did not misread the docu, isoqlog uses syslog and I really would like to keep this away from syslog. Argh. You're right. I assumed it was based on multilog since syslog sucks so bad... -Dave

Re: who rotates the logs?

2001-01-18 Thread Clemens Hermann
Am 18.01.2001 um 11:29:44 schrieb Matthew Patterson: Hi Matthew, THE REASON THAT WE USE OPEN SYSTEMS IS BECAUSE IT MEANS WE ARE NOT RESTRICTED BY SOMEONE ELSE'S DECISIONS. You are perfectly right. But qmail and its relatives are a rather complex building if you really try to understand every