David Benfell writes:
I keep hearing rumblings about how Dan plays fast and loose with the
RFCs in qmail and his other programs.
Mud-slinging 101: Claim that the program won't work for most people.
Claim that it's a research prototype not meant for serious use. Claim
that nobody uses
David Benfell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, I give up. I'm guessing other MTA's have at least as many real,
documented issues with RFC compliance as qmail. And I only see a couple
things that might be important. Am I wrong? What's the deal?
There are some RFCs that Dan has chosen
Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 15 Apr 2001 19:31:35 -:
See http://cr.yp.to/qmail/warfield.html.
Wow, I've never seen a more clueless sysadmin.[1] It's apparent that he
doesn't understand what the problem was and decided to make qmail the
scapegoat. What's sad is that there are people out
never done that).
There are some interesting notes at
http://vader.kootenay.net/qmail/misc/THOUGHTS.html The stuff that's
clearly identified as having to do with RFCs looks like it's okay.
But I don't know enough about the RFCs to see if anything else there
is related.
That is actually straight from the
Hello all,
Damn. This is going to sound like a troll. And I don't know how to
avoid that short of not asking the question.
I keep hearing rumblings about how Dan plays fast and loose with the
RFCs in qmail and his other programs. All I know is I'm a happy qmail
(and djbdns and publicfile
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:44:10AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
Hello all,
Damn. This is going to sound like a troll. And I don't know how to
avoid that short of not asking the question.
I keep hearing rumblings about how Dan plays fast and loose with the
RFCs in qmail and his other
Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 11:44:10AM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
I keep hearing rumblings about how Dan plays fast and loose with the
RFCs in qmail and his other programs. All I know is I'm a happy qmail
(and djbdns and publicfile and ezmlm+idx) user
I'm having a hard time finding out which RFCs document various protocols.
I was hoping someone could point me where to look to find the applicable
RFCs for:
SMTP, POP3, LDAP, HTML, and MIME.
If anyone could help me out, I'd appreciate it!
+ Stephen Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| I'm having a hard time finding out which RFCs document various protocols.
| I was hoping someone could point me where to look to find the applicable
| RFCs for:
|
| SMTP, POP3, LDAP, HTML, and MIME.
|
| If anyone could help me out, I'd appreciate
