On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:17:29AM +0200, Vincent Schonau wrote:
[ minor correction ]
> All installations must work the same way as an installation from source,
> without modifications on a supported platform. So adding an rc script in
> /etc/rc.d is not a problem, but installing a modified qmai
[ Please make your MUA understand Mail-Followup-To ]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:12:14PM +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> You may distribute a precompiled package if
[ ... ]
> installing your package produces exactly the same files, in exactly
> the same locations, that a user would obtain
>
You may distribute a precompiled package if
installing your package produces exactly the same files, in exactly
the same locations, that a user would obtain
by installing one of my packages listed above;
My RPM produces exactly the same file and directory structure with the
exception th
John Newbigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am probably going to start a flame war with this but I have created a
> patch for qmail 1.03 which removes the need for compiled in user and
> group id's.
>
> The patch works by replacing the auto_uida variables with #defines which
> call functions to
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:33:43PM +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> My second question is about the licence for qmail. Despite all my
> looking I can't find it. Can someone point me to the licence or
> summarise what I can do with a binary RPM.
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html>
Vince.
Title: RE: Portable RPM for qmail
1. That HAS been done before, Bruce Guenter has created a similar patch
2. Q-Mail's license does NOT allow distribution of binary packages including Q-Mail.
P.S. Please forgive the signature and HTML that this e-mail has in it, unfortunately due t
