Martin Hasenbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what could be the reason for such an error message???:
[...]
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.618145500 delivery 7: deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
[...]
> I've patched qmail with a few patches, [...]
There's your answer -- your patches are buggy. Remove t
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:59:08PM +0200, Martin Hasenbein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what could be the reason for such an error message???:
>
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.524490500 new msg 365071
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.525218500 info msg 365071: bytes 234 from <> qp 2344 uid 8001
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.612899500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello. I just installed qmail,
How? Source RPM, source tarball, or binary RPM?
>And if I try to execute qmail-remote by hand, I get a seg. fault, no core
>dumped.
That's bad, especially if that binary was built on that system.
qmail-remote is not known to crash.
-D
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:27:32AM -0400, Nat Fellows wrote:
> Hello. I just installed qmail, and I was going through and testing
> deliveries. Local to local works fine, but when I try to send mail out, I
> get this:
>
[snip]
> May 2 10:01:36 oldbd qmail: 957276096.473584 delivery 16: deferral:
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 11:04:53AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> That's bad, especially if that binary was built on that system.
> qmail-remote is not known to crash.
>
Erm... I had a crashing qmail-remote a few weeks ago. But that was due to a hardware
problem :-)
Anyway... the fact is... When
