Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Sill
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The problem comes from the fact that Linux does not adhere to BSD semantics >regarding the sync() system call. BSD semantics state that if you sync a >file, it's data and it's metadata are synced to disc. > >Linux, on the other hand, syncs only the dat

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-20 Thread Charles Cazabon
Nick (Keith) Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure on the statement that qmail is unreliable under Linux due to > its assumptiopn that "link is a synchronous operation". I've never read > anything about it. Anyone else? The problem comes from the fact that Linux does not adhere to B

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-20 Thread Balazs Nagy
On Wed, Jun 20 2001, Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:15:11PM +, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: > [snip] > > I'm not sure on the statement that qmail is unreliable under Linux due to > > its assumptiopn that "link is a synchronous operation". I've never read >

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-19 Thread Brian Moon
CTED]> Cc: "Qmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:17 PM Subject: Re: ReiserFs and qmail > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: > > > I am not sure about the recommendation to lower the conf-split, since, > > again, I am n

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-19 Thread John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: > I am not sure about the recommendation to lower the conf-split, since, > again, I am not in any way familiar with ReiserFS's operation. Generally > you want a large split since filesystems perform better with many > directories with a couple of fil

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-19 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:15:11PM +, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote: [snip] > I'm not sure on the statement that qmail is unreliable under Linux due to > its assumptiopn that "link is a synchronous operation". I've never read > anything about it. Anyone else? This is true. I'm not sure, however,

Re: ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-19 Thread Nick (Keith) Fish
Paco Gracia wrote: > > I have done some research and I found a "Qmail and ReiserFS integration and > optimization HOWTO" in http://www.jedi.claranet.fr > > How accurate is the information on that web? > > Anything else to take care of? > > Thanks in advance > === > Paco

ReiserFs and qmail

2001-06-19 Thread Paco Gracia
Hello everyone, We're going to install a new production server with the lastest linux kernel (2.4.5) and ReiserFS. Is there any issue regarding qmail? I have done some research and I found a "Qmail and ReiserFS integration and optimization HOWTO" in http://www.jedi.claranet.fr How accurate is