My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
permanently in another office.
When a user in the dialup office sends an email with a large attachment
to a large number of recipients, is it possible to configure the dialup
qmail server to send one copy to the other qmail serv
Chris McCarthy writes:
>
> My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
> permanently in another office.
> When a user in the dialup office sends an email with a large attachment
> to a large number of recipients, is it possible to configure the dialup
> qmail server to s
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 04:26:19PM +, Sam wrote:
> Chris McCarthy writes:
>
> >
> > My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
> > permanently in another office.
> > When a user in the dialup office sends an email with a large attachment
> > to a large number of rec
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 1:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Relaying large attachments
>
>
>
> My company has 2 qmail servers, one is a dialup, the other is online
> permanent
"Adam D . McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>What about using qmtp/qmqp? Wouldn't this accomplish what he needs?
No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
QMTP doesn't add anything there. The "problem" is that qmail doesn't
try to minimize bandwidth by using mult
I have thought of that, the disadvantage is that it takes longer to upload.
Sending to the server on the LAN takes hardly no time, the subsequent
uploading from server to server is of course transparent to the user.
I guess I'll just leave things as they are and suffer an occasional drop in
bandwi
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:43:25 -0400 (EDT), Dave Sill wrote:
>No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
>QMTP doesn't add anything there. The "problem" is that qmail doesn't
>try to minimize bandwidth by using multiple RCPT's [1]. Also, I
>believe he said he's unlikely
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 12:43:25PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> "Adam D . McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >What about using qmtp/qmqp? Wouldn't this accomplish what he needs?
>
> No, SMTP already has a mechanism to handle this (multiple RCPT's), and
> QMTP doesn't add anything there. The
