Hello
All,
Apologies in advance
for this question, I have trawled the archives and the various web pages
but no joy.
The problem is my
qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an average of 100 secs for a
connection to be made. I am running qmail on a redhat 7.0
box.
I have e
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:13:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
> average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
> redhat 7.0 box.
Oh no, once more THE qmail-FAQ. If you really traveeled the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Apologies in advance for this question, I have trawled the archives and the
> various web pages but no joy.
> The problem is my qmail box responds v.slowly to smtp request, taking an
> average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
> redh
Apologies Henning,
I am using tcpserver. Qmail is set up according to life with qmail. Its nice
to see civility is not dead thou!
-Original Message-
From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2001 12:52
To:
Subject: Re: Slow smtp response
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12
> average of 100 secs for a connection to be made. I am running qmail on a
> redhat 7.0 box.
> I have eliminated networking issues. Any ideas on how to speed this up?
-Original Message-
From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2001 13:04
To:
Subject: Re:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:03:37AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip Jonathan's confidential message]
> I know exactly what your problem is, but I can't tell you, because I'm
> not sure that you addressed the question to me. Please re-send your
> message without any
Sometimes we are given Orders from On High. This has started me thinking though.
Maybe
there is away to stop the disclaimer being attached under certain conditions. If the
software adding the disclaimer permits the monkey^H^H^H^H^H^H admin to define who the
local users are so that they don't