OK, after about 3 hours of mucking about when I should have been
studying, I've come up with a way of keeping your e-mail address to
yourself on usenet, mailing lists, etc. This means that people that
reply to your e-mail will be able to get you, because their MUA will
quote your Message ID
OK, It would appear as if I've just found the first (and lets hope
last) error in my spam elimination technique/code. In
~usenet/.qmail-default, the references regex will only work if the
message ID is on the same line as the References: string. I've
modified the regex (and code) to allow the
OK, It would appear as if I've just found the first (and lets hope
last) error in my spam elimination technique/code. In
~usenet/.qmail-default, the references regex will only work if the
message ID is on the same line as the References: string. I've
modified the regex (and code) to allow
Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Spam traps like this rely on you keeping it to yourself. If enough
people start using this, spammers will adjust like they now post from
domains that exist and put "Re:" in the subject.
This spam trap, unlike most of them, require that spammers
"Russ" == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This spam trap, unlike most of them, require that spammers keep an
additional piece of information around in addition to the e-mail
address, information that they cannot construct mechanically
(provided that you construct the regex carefully
"Brett" == Brett Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snipped
I didn't want to, but I had to... I've updated the spam eliminator
perl code AGAIN to handle crap MUAs that only support In-Reply-To and
don't use the References line. Its up to you whether you use the
In-Reply-To or not. I might dump
